Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Basseville (1988)
Detecting changes in signals and systems - A surveyAutom., 24
S. Hu, G. Sun
Techniques of Process Monitoring and their Applications
F. Hampel, E. Ronchetti, P. Rousseeuw, W. Stahel (1986)
Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions
Z. Deng, Y. Liu
New algorithms of steady‐state Kalman filter for stochastic control systems
N.G. Leveson
A New Approach to System Safety Engineering
Zhang Yong (2007)
Multidimensional time series analysis based on support vector regression and controlled autoregressive and its application in ecologyActa Ecologica Sinica
F.R. Hampel, E.M. Ronchetti, P.J. Rousseeuw
Robust Statistics – The Approach Based on Influence
Z. Deng
Optimal Filtering Theory and Its Application‐modern Time Series Analysis Method
N. Hilgert, J. Vila (1999)
D-Step Ahead Kalman Predictor for Controlled Autoregressive Processes With Random CoefficientsInternational Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 9
S. Hu, M. Karl
Fault‐tolerant fitting and online diagnosis of faults in SISO process
R. Patton, P.M. Frank, R.N. Clark
Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems‐Theory and Applications
M.G. Perhinschi, M.R. Napolitano, B. Stolarik
Design of safety monitor schemes for a fault tolerant flight control system
G.E.P. Box, G.M. Jenkins
Time Series Analysis‐Forecasting and Control
Han Park, M. Zak (2003)
Gray-Box Approach for Fault Detection of Dynamical SystemsJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-transactions of The Asme, 125
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present research in detecting and identifying abrupt faults in controlled auto‐regressive (CAR) processes. Design/methodology/approach – Model‐based approach is adopted in this paper. Two series of fault‐tolerant iterative estimators are set up to estimate online the coefficients in a CAR process. Based on these fault‐tolerant estimators, the detailed detecting and identifying algorithms are obtained for not only the pulse‐type faults but also the step‐type faults in CAR process. Findings – This paper illustrates the useful information that can be obtained from residuals and that can be used to detect pulse‐type faults as well as step‐type faults. A fault‐tolerant recursive estimator for the coefficients of the CAR process is put forward. Using a simple transformation from step‐ to pulse‐type faults, all kinds of diagnosis methods to detect and identify step‐type faults can be used. Research limitations/implications – Fault‐tolerant estimators and fault detection and identification algorithms are aimed at abrupt faults in CAR processes. Practical implications – Most of the algorithms given in this paper can be used in many different fields, such as process monitoring, safety control and change detection, etc. Originality/value – This paper contributes to research of abrupt faults and abrupt changes in a CAR process and emphasizes identification of magnitudes of abrupt faults. The fault‐tolerant estimators are effective not only to detect faults but also to identify safely the coefficients CAR model.
International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 6, 2008
Keywords: Programming and algorithm theory; Autoregressive processes; Fault tolerance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.