Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Lipset, E. Ladd (1971)
The Divided ProfessoriateChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 3
P. Blau (2021)
The Organization of Academic Work
D. Katz, R. Kahn (1966)
The Social Psychology of Organizations
K. Weick (2017)
Contradictions in a Community of Scholars: The Cohesion-Accuracy TradeoffThe Review of Higher Education, 6
M. Keeton (1970)
The Disenfranchised on Campus.The Journal of Higher Education, 41
H. Maccoby, H. Orlans (1964)
The effects of Federal programs on higher education : a study of 36 universities and collegesAmerican Sociological Review, 29
Marshall Meyer, J. Pfeffer (1982)
Power in Organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 28
R. Rosenzweig (1970)
Who Wants to Govern the University
S. Ikenberry (1970)
Restructuring the Governance of Higher Education.AAUP Bulletin, 56
Atwood Erwin, K. Starck (1970)
Faculty Attitudes Toward University Role and Governance: A Factor Analytic Approach.Journal of Experimental Education, 39
O. Pardee, Harriet Stull, W. Woolf (1969)
Report of the Survey Subcommittee of Committee TAAUP Bulletin, 55
J. Corson (1973)
College and University Government: A Handbook of Principle and PracticeThe Journal of Higher Education, 44
J. Baldridge, David Curtis, G. Ecker, Gary Riley (1977)
Diversity in Higher Education Professional AutonomyThe Journal of Higher Education, 48
W. Hohenstein, B. Williams (1974)
The Forgotten Man--The Non-Faculty Non-Classified University Employee.The Journal of the College and University Personnel Association
H. Simon (1973)
Applying Information Technology to Organization DesignPublic Administration Review, 33
Paul Montagna (1968)
Professionalization and Bureaucratization in Large Professional OrganizationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 74
A. Pfnister (1970)
The Role of Faculty in University Governance.The Journal of Higher Education, 41
Faculty expectations for nonacademic staff participation insystems of shared authority governance define the parameters oflegitimate interests. Delineates and analyses role sender facultyviews of nonacademic staff participation in organizational governance.Studies four issue areas academic affairs, financial and personnelaffairs, institutional affairs, and student affairs. There wasconsiderable support for nonacademic staff participation in governance.Results suggest limited roles in governance for nonacademic employeesin complex organizations where faculty are primary role senders, and nosupport for the significant redistribution of legitimate faculty rightsand authorities.
Journal of Educational Administration – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.