Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Norum (2003)
Examination of Generational Differences in Household Apparel ExpendituresFamily and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 32
Journal of Home Economics, 61
C. Williams, J. Windebank (2000)
Modes of goods acquisition in deprived neighbourhoodsThe International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 10
C. Hager, W. Bryant (1977)
Clothing Expenditures of Low Income Rural FamiliesJournal of Consumer Affairs, 11
P. Norum (1989)
Economic Analysis of Quarterly Household Expenditures on ApparelFamily and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 17
The Marketing Management Journal, 20
Y. Steinbring, M. Rucker (2003)
Utilization of Post-Consumer Textiles and ClothingJournal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 95
Gretchen Herrmann (1996)
WOMEN'S EXCHANGE IN THE U.S. GARAGE SALEGender & Society, 10
Hazel Clark (2008)
SLOW + FASHION—an Oxymoron—or a Promise for the Future …?Fashion Theory, 12
N. Gregson, Vikki Beale (2004)
Wardrobe matter: the sorting, displacement and circulation of women's clothingGeoforum, 35
J. Tinson, P. Nuttall (2007)
Insider Trading? Exploring Familial Intra-generational Borrowing and SharingThe Marketing Review, 7
Lynn O’Reilly, M. Rucker, R. Hughes, Marge Gorang, Susan Hand (1984)
The relationship of psychological and situational variables to usage of a second-order marketing systemJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 12
Zhimin Zhang, Marjorie Norton (1995)
Family Members' Expenditures for Clothing CategoriesFamily and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23
Janet Wagner, Sherman Hanna (1983)
The Effectiveness of Family Life Cycle Variables in Consumer Expenditure ResearchJournal of Consumer Research, 10
R. Dardis, F. Derrick, Alane Lehfeld (1981)
Clothing Demand in the United States: A Cross-Sectional AnalysisFamily and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 10
Kathryn Koch, Tanya Domina (1999)
Consumer Textile Recycling as a Means of Solid Waste ReductionFamily and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 28
Julie Nelson (1989)
Individual Consumption within the Household: A Study of Expenditures on ClothingJournal of Consumer Affairs, 23
K. Charles, Erik Hurst, N. Roussanov (2007)
Conspicuous Consumption and RaceKauffman: Entrepreneurship Scholars Initiatives (Topic)
Hyun-Mee Joung, H. Park-Poaps (2013)
Factors motivating and influencing clothing disposal behavioursInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 37
Journal of Home Economics, 63
C. Williams (2002)
Why Do People Use Alternative Retail Channels? Some Case-study Evidence from Two English CitiesUrban Studies, 39
C. Williams, Christopher Paddock (2003)
The meanings of informal and second-hand retail channels: some evidence from LeicesterThe International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 13
A. Deaton, J. Muellbauer (1980)
Economics and consumer behavior
Pia Albinsson, B. Perera (2009)
From Trash To Treasure And Beyond: The Meaning Of Voluntary DispositionJournal of Consumer Behaviour, 8
Jessie Fan, JoAnn Lewis (1999)
Budget Allocation Patterns of African AmericansJournal of Consumer Affairs, 33
T. Fisher, T. Cooper, S. Woodward, A. Hiller, H. Goworek (2008)
Public Understanding of Sustainable Clothing: A report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Colin Williams (2003)
Explaining Informal and Second-Hand Goods Acquisition
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore factors affecting secondhand clothing acquisition among a sample of US female consumers based on an economic perspective.Design/methodology/approachThis research is descriptive in nature, utilizing a survey of 500 US female consumers to explore relationships between five modes of secondhand clothing acquisition and selected consumer characteristics. Logistic regression was used to analyze the data.FindingsThe significant variables were income, age, number of toddlers and children ages 6-17 present in households, and sewing and repair skills. Income was found to be negatively related to purchasing secondhand clothing, suggesting that consumers view used clothing as an inferior good. Consumers in Gen Y were more likely to be involved in various means of secondhand clothing acquisition, holding income constant, than Baby Boomers.Practical implicationsOvercoming the stigma of inferiority associated with secondhand clothing, encouraging repair skills, and the repair of clothing, reaching out to consumers to build on their interest in DIY projects, and utilizing new technology (e.g. apps for sharing clothes) are practical implications.Originality/valueThe paper examined multiple modes of clothing acquisition rather than a single mode, and contributes insight regarding the economic concept of secondhand clothing as an inferior good.
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 8, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.