Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Jokinen (2005)
Global leadership competencies: a review and discussionJournal of European Industrial Training, 29
A. Padilla, R. Hogan, R. Kaiser (2007)
The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments.Leadership Quarterly, 18
Abagail McWilliams, D. Siegel (2001)
Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 26
Jennifer Sparr, S. Sonnentag (2008)
Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at workEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17
F. Hesselbein
Emerging leaders
Geoffrey Abbott, B. Stening, Paul Atkins, A. Grant (2006)
Coaching expatriate managers for success: Adding value beyond training and mentoring:Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44
James Anderson, D. Gerbing (1988)
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACHPsychological Bulletin, 103
W. Everton, Jeffrey Jolton, Paul Mastrangelo (2007)
Be nice and fair or else: understanding reasons for employees' deviant behaviorsJournal of Management Development, 26
G. Hamel, C. Prahalad (1985)
Do you really have a global strategyThe International Executive, 27
C. Hui, K. Law, N. Chen, D. Tjosvold (2008)
The role of co‐operation and competition on leader‐member exchange and extra‐role performance in ChinaAsia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Abubakr Suliman (2007)
Links between justice, satisfaction and performance in the workplace: A survey in the UAE and Arabic context.Journal of Management Development, 26
J. Cohen
Statistical Power for the Behavioral Sciences
Randal Ford (2006)
Why we fail: How hubris, hamartia, and anagnosis shape organizational behaviorHuman Resource Development Quarterly, 17
T. Golden, J. Veiga (2008)
The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workersLeadership Quarterly, 19
Cam Caldwell, L. Hayes (2007)
Leadership, trustworthiness, and the mediating lensJournal of Management Development, 26
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
Charlotte Gerstner, D. Day (1997)
Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct IssuesJournal of Applied Psychology, 82
K. Boal, Patrick Schultz (2007)
Storytelling, time, and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems ☆Leadership Quarterly, 18
G. Graen, Mary Uhl‐Bien (1995)
Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspectiveLeadership Quarterly, 6
David Mayer, Mary Bardes, Ronald Piccolo (2008)
Do servant-leaders help satisfy follower needs? An organizational justice perspectiveEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17
R. Dunford, I. Palmer, Jodie Benveniste, J. Crawford (2007)
Coexistence of 'old' and 'new' organizational practices : transitory phenomenon or enduring feature?Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45
D. Jamali, Y. Sidani, D. Zaki (2008)
Emotional intelligence and management development implications: insights from the Lebanese contextScopus
Marilyn Byrd (2007)
Educating and Developing Leaders of Racially Diverse Organizations.Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18
Charmine Härtel, H. Gough, G. Hartel (2008)
Work‐group emotional climate, emotion management skills, and service attitudes and performanceAsia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
J. Blake (2006)
From protection to innovation: BT's journey in corporate social responsibilityGlobal Business and Organizational Excellence, 26
V. Vial (2007)
Corporate social responsibility: A third way? An interview with Sir Geoffrey OwenGlobal Business and Organizational Excellence, 26
R. Ilies, J. Nahrgang, F. Morgeson (2007)
Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 1
Michael Nelson (2008)
Odysseus and Aeneas: A classical perspective on leadershipLeadership Quarterly, 19
M. Crossan, Dusya Vera, Len Nanjad (2008)
Transcendent leadership: Strategic leadership in dynamic environmentsLeadership Quarterly, 19
D. Plowman, Stephanie Solansky, Tammy Beck, LaKami Baker, Mukta Kulkarni, Deandra Travis (2007)
The role of leadership in emergent, self-organizationLeadership Quarterly, 18
Bill Zimmermann, J. Chanaron, L. Klieb (2007)
A benchmark for managerial effectivenessInternational Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 7
S. Campbell, Andrew Ward, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, Bradley Agle (2008)
Relational Ties That Bind: Leader–Follower Relationship Dimensions and Charismatic AttributionLeadership Quarterly, 19
Elizabeth Edersheim, C. Wynett (2008)
The next management revolution: Investing in social assetsLeader To Leader, 2008
D. Knippenberg, David Cremer (2008)
Leadership and fairness: Taking stock and looking aheadEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17
Bob Buford (2007)
Finishing well: How pathfinders transform success to significanceLeader To Leader, 2007
S. Forsyth, A. Polzer-Debruyne (2007)
The organisational pay-offs for perceived work–life balance support:Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45
Katherine Handin, Janet Steinwedel (2006)
Developing global leaders: Executive coaching targets cross‐cultural competenciesGlobal Business and Organizational Excellence, 26
C. Horn (2006)
Mega-trends in the American workforceHuman Resource Development Quarterly, 17
D. Knippenberg, D. Cremer, Barbara Knippenberg (2006)
Leadership and fairness: The state of the artEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16
Frances Hesselbein (2008)
Collaborations make a powerful differenceLeader To Leader, 2008
John Wood, Tricia Vilkinas (2007)
Characteristics associated with CEO success: perceptions of CEOs and their staffJournal of Management Development, 26
Ronald Piccolo, Mary Bardes, David Mayer, T. Judge (2008)
Does high quality leader–member exchange accentuate the effects of organizational justice?European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17
W.J. Everton, J.A. Jolton, P. Mastrangelo
Be nice or else: understanding reasons for employees' deviant behavior
S. Wasti, H. Tan, H. Brower, Ç. Önder (2007)
Cross-Cultural Measurement of Supervisor Trustworthiness: An Assessment of Measurement Invariance across Three CulturesLeadership Quarterly, 18
Gwendolyn Combs, F. Luthans (2007)
Diversity Training: Analysis of the Impact of Self-EfficacyHuman Resource Development Quarterly, 18
C. Brotheridge, Stephen Long (2007)
The “real‐world” challenges of managers: implications for management educationJournal of Management Development, 26
D. Simonton (1984)
Genius, creativity, and leadership
Annick Janson, L. Levy, S. Sitkin, Allan Lind (2008)
Fairness and other leadership heuristics: A four-nation studyEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine whether the nature of leadership in the early years of the twenty‐first century as conceptualized in the research literature is valid among real organizational leaders across four global regions. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review of recent scholarly articles suggested that today's leadership best practices can be sorted into six categories, or zones: Reflection, Society, Diversity, Ingenuity, People, and Business. These six zones became topics for focus groups of organizational leaders that tentatively supported the six‐zone structure and provided qualitative data used to create a 42‐item measure, the AchieveGlobal Leadership Scale (AGLS). The AGLS was then employed to examine the degree to which 899 leaders in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and the USA felt that each zone was important in meeting their organizational challenges. Findings – The data from the 42 items were analyzed using a confirmatory factor analysis, which suggested that the six zones all triangulated on and comprised the larger construct, Leadership in the twenty‐first century. Regional differences emerged in the importance that leaders attributed to the zones, in the degree to which leaders effectively demonstrated the zones, and in the order in which leaders ranked their organizations' top business challenges. Originality/value – The six‐zone model of leadership and its differences by geographic region hold potential to help leaders examine and improve their own leadership abilities.
Leadership & Organization Development Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 2, 2012
Keywords: Global leadership; Organizational challenges; Zones of leadership; Leadership; Corporate strategy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.