Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Externalizing Europe: the global effects of European data protection

Externalizing Europe: the global effects of European data protection This paper aims to explain how the EU projects its own data protection regime to third states and the US in particular. Digital services have become a central element in the transatlantic economy. A substantial part of that trade is associated with the transfer of data, most of it personal, requiring many of the new products and services emerging to adhere to data protection standards. Yet different conceptions of data protection exist across the Atlantic, with the EU putting a particular focus on protecting the fundamental right to privacy.Design/methodology/approachUsing the distinction between positive and negative forms of market integration as a starting point (Scharpf, 1997), this paper examines the question of how the EU is projecting its own data protection regime to third states. The so-called California effect (Vogel, 1997) and the utilization of trade agreements in the EU’s foreign policy and external relations are well researched. With decreasing effectiveness and limited territorial reach of its enlargement policy, the EU found trade agreements to be particularly effective to set standards on a global level (Lavenex and Schimmelfennig, 2009). The existence of the single market makes the Union not only an important locus of regulation but also a strong economic actor with the global ambition of digital assertiveness. In the past, establishing standards for the EU’s vast consumer market has proven effective in compelling non-European market participants to join.FindingsAs the globe’s largest consumer market, Europe aims to project its own data protection laws through the market place principle (lex loci solutionis), requiring any data processor to follow its laws whenever European customers’ data are processed. This paper argues that European data protection law creates a “California Effect”, whereby the EU exerts pressure on extra-territorial markets by unilateral standard setting.Originality/valueWith its GDPR, the EU may have defused the problem of European citizens’ data being stored and evaluated according to the US law. However, it has also set a precedent of extra-territorial applicability of its legislation – despite having previously criticized the USA for such practices. By now, international companies increasingly store data of European customers in Europe to prevent conflicts with EU law. With this decision, the EU will apply its own law on others’ sovereign territory. Conflicts created through the extra-territorial effects of national law may contradict the principle of due diligence obligations but are nevertheless not illegitimate. They may, however, have further unintended effects: Other major economies are likely to be less reluctant in the future about passing legal provisions with extra-territorial effect. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance Emerald Publishing

Externalizing Europe: the global effects of European data protection

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/externalizing-europe-the-global-effects-of-european-data-protection-G96CcteKLf
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2398-5038
DOI
10.1108/dprg-07-2018-0038
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper aims to explain how the EU projects its own data protection regime to third states and the US in particular. Digital services have become a central element in the transatlantic economy. A substantial part of that trade is associated with the transfer of data, most of it personal, requiring many of the new products and services emerging to adhere to data protection standards. Yet different conceptions of data protection exist across the Atlantic, with the EU putting a particular focus on protecting the fundamental right to privacy.Design/methodology/approachUsing the distinction between positive and negative forms of market integration as a starting point (Scharpf, 1997), this paper examines the question of how the EU is projecting its own data protection regime to third states. The so-called California effect (Vogel, 1997) and the utilization of trade agreements in the EU’s foreign policy and external relations are well researched. With decreasing effectiveness and limited territorial reach of its enlargement policy, the EU found trade agreements to be particularly effective to set standards on a global level (Lavenex and Schimmelfennig, 2009). The existence of the single market makes the Union not only an important locus of regulation but also a strong economic actor with the global ambition of digital assertiveness. In the past, establishing standards for the EU’s vast consumer market has proven effective in compelling non-European market participants to join.FindingsAs the globe’s largest consumer market, Europe aims to project its own data protection laws through the market place principle (lex loci solutionis), requiring any data processor to follow its laws whenever European customers’ data are processed. This paper argues that European data protection law creates a “California Effect”, whereby the EU exerts pressure on extra-territorial markets by unilateral standard setting.Originality/valueWith its GDPR, the EU may have defused the problem of European citizens’ data being stored and evaluated according to the US law. However, it has also set a precedent of extra-territorial applicability of its legislation – despite having previously criticized the USA for such practices. By now, international companies increasingly store data of European customers in Europe to prevent conflicts with EU law. With this decision, the EU will apply its own law on others’ sovereign territory. Conflicts created through the extra-territorial effects of national law may contradict the principle of due diligence obligations but are nevertheless not illegitimate. They may, however, have further unintended effects: Other major economies are likely to be less reluctant in the future about passing legal provisions with extra-territorial effect.

Journal

Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 23, 2019

Keywords: Privacy; Data protection; Digital trade; Fundamental rights; California effect

References

  • Tests of partnership: transatlantic cooperation in cyber security, internet governance, and data protection
    Bendiek, A.
  • The Geo-Politics of personal data
    Bennett, C.J.
  • Einhaltung von recht jenseits des nationalstaats. Zur implementationslogik marktkorrigierender regelungen in der EU
    Börzel, T.; Hofmann, T.; Sprungk, C.
  • The end of safe harbor: what future for EU-US data transfers?
    Carrera, S.; Guild, E.
  • Communication from the European commission to the European parliament and the council. Exchanging and protecting personal data in a globalised world
  • EU provisions on cross-border data flows and protection of personal data and privacy in the digital trade title of EU trade agreements
  • Adequacy decisions
  • Die informierte einwilligung: ein datenschutzphantom
    Hofmann, J.; Bergemann, B.
  • Extraterritoriality and regulation of international data transfers in EU data protection law
    Kuner, C.
  • EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics
    Lavenex, S.; Schimmelfennig, F.
  • The importance of the internet and transatlantic data flows for US And EU trade and investment
    Meltzer, J.P.
  • From safe harbour to privacy shield: advances and shortcomings of the new EU-US data transfer rules
    Monteleone, S.; Puccio, L.
  • Industrial data space: digital sovereignity over data
    Otto, B.; Auer, S.; Cirullies, J.; Jürjens, J.; Menz, N.
  • A data localization free-for-All?
    Reinsch, W.A.
  • New laws make Europe a regulator of U.S. privacy
    Romm, T.; Timberg, C.; Birnbaum, M.
  • International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order
    Ruggie, J.G.
  • Balancing positive and negative integration: the regulatory options for Europe
    Scharpf, F.W.
  • The two Western cultures of privacy: dignity versus liberty
    Whitman, J.Q.