Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Friedman (1995)
On Promoting a Sustainable Future Through Consumer ActivismJournal of Social Issues, 51
J.N. Sneddon, J.A. Lee, G.N. Soutar
Ethical issues that impact on wool apparel purchases
G. Hustvedt, H. Peterson, Yun‐Ju Chen (2008)
Labelling wool products for animal welfare and environmental impactInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 32
T. Newholm
Understanding the ethical consumer: employing a frame of bounded rationality
Cotton Incorporated
Global consumer apparel shopping trends
G. Hustvedt, John Bernard (2008)
Consumer willingness to pay for sustainable apparel: the influence of labelling for fibre origin and production methodsInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 32
R. Caruana (2007)
A sociological perspective of consumption moralityJournal of Consumer Behaviour, 6
Australian Wool Innovation
Strategic Plan 2010 to 2013
P. Green, V. Srinivasan (1978)
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and OutlookJournal of Consumer Research, 5
Fredrica Rudell (2006)
Shopping With a Social Conscience: Consumer Attitudes Toward Sweatshop LaborClothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24
J. Rolfe (1999)
Ethical Rules and the Demand for Free Range EggsEconomic Analysis and Policy, 29
G. Harper, Aikaterini Makatouni (2002)
Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfareBritish Food Journal, 104
J. Sneddon, B. Rollin (2010)
Mulesing and Animal EthicsJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23
Bretton‐Clark
Conjoint Analyzer (Version 3)
Steve Hoeffler, Kevin Keller (2002)
Building Brand Equity through Corporate Societal MarketingJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
The animals: death ‘Down Under’
M. Dickson (1999)
US consumers' knowledge of and concern with apparel sweatshopsJournal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 3
C. Hovland, I. Janis, H. Kelley (1953)
Communication And Persuasion
The Woolmark Company
Potential Customer Requirements and Demand for ‘Ethical‐Wool’
A. Chapagain, A. Hoekstra, H. Savenije, R. Gautam (2006)
The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countriesEcological Economics, 60
D. Shaw, E. Shiu, Louise Hassan, C. Bekin, G. Hogg (2007)
Intending to be ethical: An examination of consumer choice in sweatshop avoidanceACR North American Advances, 34
D.S. Shaw, E. Shui, G. Hogg, E. Wilson, L. Hassan
Fashion victim: the impact of sweatshop concerns on clothing choice
K. Fletcher (2008)
Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys
A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann, F. Huber (2000)
Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications
R.A. Smith
In fashion: forget fleece? Wool makes a comeback: this time around, wool makes lighter, softer fabric for outdoor apparel
O. Freestone, P. McGoldrick (2008)
Motivations of the Ethical ConsumerJournal of Business Ethics, 79
V. Matthews
Give farmers a coffee break
Michael Chiam, G. Soutar, Alvin Yeo (2009)
Online and Off-line Travel Packages Preferences: A Conjoint AnalysisInternational Journal of Tourism Research, 11
R.H. Karpatkin
More than money: memo to members
D. Shaw, I. Clarke (1999)
Belief formation in ethical consumer groups: an exploratory studyMarketing Intelligence & Planning, 17
B. Ortega
Organic cotton may feel soft to touch, but its hard to sell
M. Qaim, A. Janvry (2005)
Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effectsEnvironment and Development Economics, 10
M.C. Appleby
Chickens layer housing
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo
Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic, Contemporary Approaches
M. Dickson (2001)
Utility of No Sweat Labels for Apparel Consumers: Profiling Label Users and Predicting Their PurchasesJournal of Consumer Affairs, 35
J. Sneddon, J. Lee, G. Soutar (2012)
Exploring consumer beliefs about wool apparel in the USA and AustraliaThe Journal of The Textile Institute, 103
M. Dickson (2000)
Personal Values, Beliefs, Knowledge, and Attitudes Relating to Intentions to Purchase Apparel from Socially Responsible BusinessesClothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18
Australian Wool Innovation
AWI Strategic Plan: 2008/09‐2010/11
M. Lempriere
Test Marketing Project USA 2006
David Stewart, Prem Shamdasani (1991)
Focus Groups: Theory and Practice
J. Abend
The green wave swells
J. Sneddon, J. Lee, G. Soutar (2012)
Making sense of consumers’ wool apparel preferencesThe Journal of The Textile Institute, 103
R. Bennett (1997)
Farm animal welfare and food policyFood Policy, 22
Soyeon Shim (1995)
Environmentalism and Consumers' Clothing Disposal Patterns: An Exploratory StudyClothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13
H.H. Peterson, G. Hustvedt, Y. Chen
US consumer's willingness to pay for wool product attributes
D. Shaw, G. Hogg, E. Wilson, E. Shiu, Louise Hassan (2006)
Fashion victim: the impact of fair trade concerns on clothing choiceJournal of Strategic Marketing, 14
Australian Wool Innovation
Strategic Plan for Australian Wool Innovation 2007‐2012
H. Cherrier (2007)
Ethical consumption practices: co‐production of self‐expression and social recognitionJournal of Consumer Behaviour, 6
E. North, Retha Vos, Theuns Kotzé (2010)
The importance of apparel product attributes for female buyersTydskrif vir Gesinsekologie en Verbruikerswetenskappe, 31
M. Korthals (2001)
Taking Consumers Seriously: Two Concepts of Consumer SovereigntyJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14
M. Dickson, S. Loker, M. Eckman (2009)
Social Responsibility in the Global Apparel Industry
P. Auger, T. Devinney, J. Louviere, Paul Burke (2008)
Do Social Product Features Have Value to ConsumersInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 25
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo, D. Schumann (1983)
Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of InvolvementJournal of Consumer Research, 10
P. Auger, Paul Burke, T. Devinney, J. Louviere (2003)
What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features?Journal of Business Ethics, 42
I. Ajzen, M. Fishbein
Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior
P. Pelsmacker, L. Driesen, G. Rayp (2005)
Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair‐Trade CoffeeJournal of Consumer Affairs, 39
S. Zadek (2004)
The path to corporate responsibility.Harvard business review, 82 12
D. Shaw, R. Duff
Ethics and social responsibility in fashion and clothing choice
P. Auger, T. Devinney, J. Louviere (2007)
Using Best–Worst Scaling Methodology to Investigate Consumer Ethical Beliefs Across CountriesJournal of Business Ethics, 70
Hsiou-Lien Chen, L. Burns (2006)
Environmental Analysis of Textile ProductsClothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the potentially conflicting positive and negative ethical aspects of wool apparel and the relative importance of these ethical attributes when consumers in the USA make wool apparel purchase decisions. Design/methodology/approach – A two‐stage mixed‐method approach was used to explore the positive and negative ethical aspects of wool apparel and the relative importance of these ethical attributes in wool apparel purchase decisions. First, focus groups were used to identify ethical attributes that were important to wool apparel consumers in the USA. In the second stage, a conjoint survey was used to estimate the relative importance of the ethical and product attributes that were identified in the focus groups and the trade‐offs made within this attribute set. Findings – Seven themes of ethical issues related to wool apparel consumption emerged during the focus groups: animal welfare, workers’ rights, environmental impact, extrinsic attributes, natural wool, country of origin (COO) and fair trade. In the conjoint analysis respondents identified COO as having the highest relative importance, followed by price, brand, ethical attributes and style. A cluster analysis of survey responses suggested there were two clusters that differed in the importance they attached to ethical labelling issues in wool apparel. The first cluster, did not place a great deal of importance on the ethical labelling issues included in the study, however, the second smaller cluster, ethical issues, specifically the humane treatment of sheep, were considered most important. Originality/value – The study identified wool apparel attributes that were valued by American consumers. That product attributes were more important than ethical attributes suggests a focus on ethical credentials alone may not be effective in wool marketing. Wool apparel was more likely to be purchased by American consumers if they were made in the USA, reasonably priced, made by an independent brand, from humanely produced wool and in a comfortable style.
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 6, 2014
Keywords: Consumer attitudes; Consumer research; Consumer decision process
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.