Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Guba, Y. Lincoln (2005)
Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.
G. Rhodes, G. Shiel (2007)
Meeting the needs of the workplace and the learner through work‐based learningJournal of Workplace Learning, 19
Bente Elkjaer (2004)
Organizational LearningManagement Learning, 35
D. Coghlan, T. Brannick
Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization
R. Revans (1998)
ABC of Action Learning
S. Gherardi (2001)
From Organizational Learning to Practice-Based KnowingHuman Relations, 54
E. Gummesson
Forskare och Konsult – om Aktionsforskning och Fallstudier i Företagsekonomi
W. Whyte (1991)
Social Theory for Action: How Individuals and Organizations Learn to Change
A. Olsson (2006)
The Change from Feature Focus to Customer Focus in Packaging Development
M. Lloyd, S. Maguire (2002)
The possibility horizonJournal of Change Management, 3
J. Spender (1996)
Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theoryJournal of Organizational Change Management, 9
A. Cunliffe (2004)
On Becoming a Critically Reflexive PractitionerJournal of Management Education, 28
M. Döös
Organizational learning. Competence‐bearing relations and breakdowns of workplace relatonics
Michael Lissack (1999)
Complexity: the Science, its Vocabulary, and its Relation to OrganizationsEmergence, 1
M.R. Lissack
Knowledge is not infrastructure: applying metaphorical lessons from complexity science
Edward Toomer, K. Bowen (1989)
Qualitative Methods in Management ResearchJournal of the Operational Research Society, 44
Dag Näslund (2002)
Logistics needs qualitative research – especially action researchInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32
C. Argyris (2003)
A Life Full of LearningOrganization Studies, 24
W. Whyte, D. Greenwood, P. Lazes (1989)
Participatory Action ResearchAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 32
K. Illeris (2007)
What Do We Actually Mean by Experiential Learning?Human Resource Development Review, 6
D. Greenwood, M. Levin (2007)
Introduction: Action Research, Diversity, and Democracy
B. Elkjaer
Organizational learning – the ‘third way’
C. Argyris (1995)
Action science and organizational learningJournal of Managerial Psychology, 10
Dag Näslund, A. Olsson, Sture Karlsson (2006)
Operationalizing the concept of value – an action research‐based modelThe Learning Organization, 13
P. Checkland (1981)
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
B. Workman (2007)
Casing the jointJournal of Workplace Learning, 19
D.A. Kolb
David A. Kolb on experiential learning
A. Cunliffe (2002)
Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management LearningManagement Learning, 33
D. Pauleen, B. Corbitt, P. Yoong (2007)
Discovering and Articulating What Is Not yet Known: Using Action Learning and Grounded Theory as a Knowledge Management StrategyThe Learning Organization, 14
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a retrospective reflection over unconscious, emergent learning among employees of an organization and to suggest how to capture these moments of experiential learning for future organizational learning. Design/methodology/approach – Action research in organizations is undertaken in interaction with the employees of the organization studied. The outcome is characterized by a deep understanding of the individuals as well as of the course of events in the system. The paper therefore applies action research, focusing on the experiential learning from daily actions in the case organization at Volvo Cars’ production plant in Sweden. Findings – The conclusion is that an evolution toward a learning organization, as exemplified by the case studied, is not identified until after it actually happens, i.e. in retrospect. It is suggested that the competence build‐up recognized in retrospect should become an integral part of future educational programs. The multidisciplinary competence established should also be considered when teams are set up for new projects. Practical implications – Future strategies for capturing learning are provided and summarized, to structure the capturing of learning as it takes place in the daily operation, to identify the individuals who initiate changes and let them act as learning ambassadors, to integrate multidisciplinary competencies in the early stages of projects, and to facilitate multidisciplinary cooperation along organizational processes, within and between firms. Originality/value – The paper's contribution is the identification of and reflection about emergent learning that takes place in daily work tasks. It also provides suggestions for future strategies of capturing these experiential learning occasions.
Journal of Workplace Learning – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 8, 2008
Keywords: Learning organizations; Experiential learning; Action research; Case studies; Packaging
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.