Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Examining the functions of prison critical incidents: a preliminary qualitative analysis of public reporting

Examining the functions of prison critical incidents: a preliminary qualitative analysis of... The purpose of this paper is to explore the function of crisis incidents in prisons within the UK and USA. The incidents reviewed included riots and hostage incidents, focusing only on information that was available publically. It did not intend to capture official reports not in the public domain.Design/methodology/approachPublically available information on incidents were systematically reviewed. Functional assessment and grounded theory were employed to examine background factors, triggers and maintaining factors. In total, 25 crisis incidents were analysed (UK =10 and USA =15) from the past 30 years. It was predicted that crisis incidents would be motivated by negative and positive reinforcement, with negative more evidenced than positive. Precipitating factors (i.e. triggers) were predicted to include negative emotions, such as frustration and anger.FindingsSimilarities in triggers and background factors were noted between hostage taking and riot incidents. Positive reinforcement was primarily indicated. Riots appeared driven by a need to communicate, to secure power, rights, control and/or freedom, whereas for hostage taking these functions extended to capture the removal of negative emotions, to inflict pain, to punish/gain revenge, to effect a release, to manage boredom and to promote positive emotions.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is preliminary and focused on the reporting of incidents in publically available sources; consequently, the data are secondary in nature and further limited by sample size. Nevertheless, it highlights evidence for similarities between types of crisis incidents but also some important potential differences. The need to understand the protective factors preventing incidents and minimising harm during incidents is recommended.Practical implicationsIt highlights evidence for similarities between types of critical incidents but also some important potential differences. Understanding differences between incidents is important in the tailoring of specific policies to address these areas. Understanding motivation and reinforcement is valuable in working towards the prevention of critical incidents. Understanding the protective factors preventing incidents and minimising harm during incidents is recommended.Originality/valueThis is an under-researched area. The study contributes to the field not only by focusing on providing a detailed analysis of an under-used source (public reporting) but by also identifying where gaps in research remain. The results demonstrate the value in understanding incidents through their motivation, particularly in distinguishing between negative and positive reinforcement. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice Emerald Publishing

Examining the functions of prison critical incidents: a preliminary qualitative analysis of public reporting

Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/examining-the-functions-of-prison-critical-incidents-a-preliminary-y7DmYa2ql4
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2056-3841
DOI
10.1108/jcrpp-12-2017-0040
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the function of crisis incidents in prisons within the UK and USA. The incidents reviewed included riots and hostage incidents, focusing only on information that was available publically. It did not intend to capture official reports not in the public domain.Design/methodology/approachPublically available information on incidents were systematically reviewed. Functional assessment and grounded theory were employed to examine background factors, triggers and maintaining factors. In total, 25 crisis incidents were analysed (UK =10 and USA =15) from the past 30 years. It was predicted that crisis incidents would be motivated by negative and positive reinforcement, with negative more evidenced than positive. Precipitating factors (i.e. triggers) were predicted to include negative emotions, such as frustration and anger.FindingsSimilarities in triggers and background factors were noted between hostage taking and riot incidents. Positive reinforcement was primarily indicated. Riots appeared driven by a need to communicate, to secure power, rights, control and/or freedom, whereas for hostage taking these functions extended to capture the removal of negative emotions, to inflict pain, to punish/gain revenge, to effect a release, to manage boredom and to promote positive emotions.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is preliminary and focused on the reporting of incidents in publically available sources; consequently, the data are secondary in nature and further limited by sample size. Nevertheless, it highlights evidence for similarities between types of crisis incidents but also some important potential differences. The need to understand the protective factors preventing incidents and minimising harm during incidents is recommended.Practical implicationsIt highlights evidence for similarities between types of critical incidents but also some important potential differences. Understanding differences between incidents is important in the tailoring of specific policies to address these areas. Understanding motivation and reinforcement is valuable in working towards the prevention of critical incidents. Understanding the protective factors preventing incidents and minimising harm during incidents is recommended.Originality/valueThis is an under-researched area. The study contributes to the field not only by focusing on providing a detailed analysis of an under-used source (public reporting) but by also identifying where gaps in research remain. The results demonstrate the value in understanding incidents through their motivation, particularly in distinguishing between negative and positive reinforcement.

Journal

Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 4, 2018

Keywords: Critical incidents; Riots; Hostage taking; Prison aggression; Public reporting; SORC

References

  • Examining the portrayal of homophobic and non-homophobic aggression in print media through an integrated grounded behavioural linguistic inquiry (IGBLI) approach
    Birch, P.; Ozanne, R.; Ireland, J.L.
  • Understanding prison riots: towards a threshold theory
    Boin, A.; Rattray, W.A.
  • A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior
    Burgess, R.L.; Akers, R.L.
  • Characteristics of hostage and barricade incidents: implications for negotiation strategies and training
    Feldman, T.
  • The role of the psychologist in crisis/hostage negotiations
    Hatcher, C.; Mohandie, K.; Turner, J.; Gelles, M.G.
  • Exploring individual factors associated with critical incidents in a secure psychiatric setting: a preliminary study
    Ireland, C.A.; Halpin, L.; Ireland, J.L.
  • Missed opportunities: newspaper reports of domestic violence
    Lindsay-Brisbin, J.; DePrince, A.P.; Welton-Mitchell, C.
  • Sexual assaults during hostage takings and forcible confinements: implications for practice
    Mailloux, D.L.; Serin, R.C.
  • Violence research pain, suffering and humiliation: the systemization of violence in kidnapping for ransom
    Phillips, E.M.
  • Crisis (hostage) negotiation: current strategies and issues in high-risk conflict resolution
    Vecchi, G.M.; Van Hasselt, V.B.; Romano, S.J.
  • Anatomy of riots: a situational crime prevention approach
    Verma, A.
  • Incidents of hostage taking in an English high-secure hospital
    Völlm, B.A.; Bickle, A.; Gibbon, S.
  • High risk factors of hostage barricade incidents in a Japanese sample
    Yokota, K.; Iwami, H.; Watanabe, K.; Fujita, G.; Watanabe, S.
  • Terrorist hostage taking and kidnapping: using script theory to predict the fate of a hostage
    Yun, M.; Roth, M.
  • Dispute resolution in a worker cooperative: Formal procedures and procedural justice
    Hoffman, E.A.