Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Adams, W. Hill, C. Roberts (1998)
CORPORATE SOCIAL REPORTING PRACTICES IN WESTERN EUROPE: LEGITIMATING CORPORATE BEHAVIOUR?☆☆☆British Accounting Review, 30
D. Hackston, M. Milne (1996)
Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companiesAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9
P. Stanton, J. Stanton (2002)
Corporate annual reports: research perspectives usedAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15
J. Courtis (1995)
Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidenceAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8
M. Milne, R. Adler (1999)
Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysisAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12
P. Linsley, Philip Shrives (2000)
Risk management and reporting risk in the UKJournal of Risk, 3
Thomas Lee (1994)
THE CHANGING FORM OF THE CORPORATE ANNUAL REPORTThe Accounting historians journal, 21
P. Linsley, Philip Shrives (2005)
Transparency and the disclosure of risk information in the banking sectorJournal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 13
Purpose This paper examines risk information disclosed by UK public companies within their annual reports. The types of risk information disclosed are analyzed and the authors examine whether a relationship exists between company size or level of risk and risk disclosure totals.Designmethodologyapproach No prior empirical studies of the risk information content of annual reports have been undertaken. To analyze the risk disclosures, a sentencebased approach was used.Findings Overall the results indicate that the companies sampled are not providing a complete picture of the risks they face. There is minimal disclosure of quantified risk information and a significant proportion of risk disclosures consist of generalized statements of risk policy. More usefully directors are releasing forwardlooking risk information. The principal driver affecting levels of risk disclosure is company size and not company risk level.Research limitationsimplications Further risk disclosure research is possible in many different areas. Crosscountry studies could be undertaken as could risk disclosure studies within specific industry sectors. A limitation of the sentencebased methodology is that it does not measure the quality of the risk disclosures and therefore different methods may be adopted in future studies.Practical implications Professional bodies attempting to improve risk reporting have not convinced directors of the benefits associated with greater voluntary risk disclosure. In the UK this has led to a mandatory requirement to provide better risk information being forced upon companies through legislation enacted by the UK government.Originalityvalue The area this paper researches is of particular importance given recent accounting scandals that have occurred. No previous risk disclosure studies have been published, therefore this exploration is also valuable in linking risk management and transparency.
The Journal of Risk Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.