Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Davis (2016)
A method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder groupsInternational Journal of Project Management, 34
K. Davis (2018)
Reconciling views of project success : a multiple stakeholder modelProject Management Journal, 49
Jui-Sheng Chou, Gabriele Leatemia (2016)
Critical Process and Factors for Ex-Post Evaluation of Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects in IndonesiaJournal of Management in Engineering, 32
A. Doty (2008)
An examination of the value of the Victorian Government's investment logic map as a tool for front-end evaluation of investment proposalsEvaluation Journal of Australasia, 8
Kam Jugdev, R. Müller (2005)
A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project SuccessProject Management Journal, 36
D. Heald (2003)
Value for money tests and accounting treatment in PFI schemesAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16
A. Wit (1988)
Measurement of project successInternational Journal of Project Management, 6
A. Shenhar, D. Dvir, Ofer Levy, A. Maltz (2001)
Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic ConceptLong Range Planning, 34
G. Debela (2019)
Critical success factors (CSFs) of public–private partnership (PPP) road projects in EthiopiaInternational Journal of Construction Management, 22
J. Koppenjan, E. Klijn, S. Verweij, M. Duijn, I. Meerkerk, Samantha Metselaar, R. Warsen (2022)
The Performance of Public–Private Partnerships: An Evaluation of 15 Years DBFM in Dutch Infrastructure GovernancePublic Performance & Management Review, 45
M. Rohman, H. Doloi, C. Heywood (2017)
Success criteria of toll road projects from a community societal perspective, 7
P. Burger, Ian Hawkesworth (2011)
How To Attain Value for Money: Comparing PPP and Traditional Infrastructure Public ProcurementOecd Journal on Budgeting, 11
Fumihiko Hashimoto (1995)
Can Machine Think, 37
H. Doloi (2012)
Assessing stakeholders' influence on social performance of infrastructure projectsFacilities, 30
Jose Oliveros-Romero, A. Aibinu (2019)
Ex post impact evaluation of PPP projects: an exploratory researchBuilt Environment Project and Asset Management
L. McLeod, B. Doolin, Stephen MacDonell (2012)
A Perspective-Based Understanding of Project SuccessProject Management Journal, 43
A. Hevner, S. March, Jinsoo Park, S. Ram (2004)
Design Science in Information Systems ResearchMIS Q., 28
Raghu Tirumala, Neeraj Dangol, P. Tiwari, P. Vaz-Serra (2021)
Comparative analysis of outcomes under PPP and traditional modes of delivery: a study of schools in MelbourneConstruction Management and Economics, 39
Junxiao Liu, P. Love, Jim Smith, M. Regan, E. Palaneeswaran (2015)
Review of performance measurement: Implications for public–private partnerships, 5
P. Raisbeck, C. Duffield, Ming Xu (2007)
Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement in AustraliaConstruction Management and Economics, 28
Lavagnon Ika, J. Pinto (2022)
The “re-meaning” of project success: Updating and recalibrating for a modern project managementInternational Journal of Project Management
(2014)
Public private partnerships - reference guide 2.0
J. Copestake (2014)
Credible impact evaluation in complex contexts: Confirmatory and exploratory approachesEvaluation, 20
R. Turner, R. Zolin (2012)
Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time FramesProject Management Journal, 43
This study aims to develop an ex-post impact evaluation method for public-private partnership projects (PPP) that addresses one of its main difficulties: the multiplicity of perspectives and stakeholders that exist in these projects.Design/methodology/approachThis study first developed a conceptual evaluation framework called ‘Project Success Evaluation Pyramid Model’ (PSEPM) that was designed using a Design Science approach. Second, an impact evaluation method was designed based on the PSEPM. This evaluation method was tested and refined using three PPP projects. This article presents the refined conceptual model PSEPM, the evaluation method and one of the three tests: the PPP toll road.FindingsThe impact evaluation method describes how to evaluate the impact of an existing mega project from the perspective of multiple stakeholders and isolate the impact of the procurement method. Its application in practice is demonstrated with a PPP toll road project in Chile, in which 11 stakeholders were identified. Issues such as city segregation, deficient business model, the relevance of infrastructure availability, and deficient service-fee strategy were identified in the project. The evaluation method provides a judgement about the use of the PPP procurement method and about the overall impact of the project, reconciling the stakeholder perspectives.Originality/valueThe use of this approach could give greater clarity and legitimacy to the discussion over the use of PPPs by evaluating existing projects beyond the use of traditional time and cost measurements. Its originality is the systematic recognition and identification of stakeholder motives, purposes, and judgements over a project.
Built Environment Project and Asset Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 21, 2023
Keywords: Impact evaluation; Project management; Project success; Public-private partnerships; Stakeholders
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.