Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Cater, R. Justis (2010)
The development and implementation of shared leadership in multi‐generational family firmsManagement Research Review, 33
L. Steier (2001)
Next-Generation Entrepreneurs and Succession: An Exploratory Study of Modes and Means of Managing Social CapitalFamily Business Review, 14
P. Westhead, Deniz Ucbasaran, M. Wright (2005)
Decisions, Actions, and Performance: Do Novice, Serial, and Portfolio Entrepreneurs Differ?*Journal of Small Business Management, 43
S. Winter, R. Nelson (1983)
An evolutionary theory of economic change
F. Kellermanns, K. Eddleston (2004)
Feuding Families: When Conflict Does a Family Firm GoodEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28
R. Nelson (2005)
Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic ChangeTechnology, Institutions, and Economic Growth
B. Murray (2003)
The Succession Transition Process: A Longitudinal PerspectiveFamily Business Review, 16
T. Zellweger, Philipp Sieger (2012)
Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived family firmsSmall Business Economics, 38
A. Ibrahim, Khaled Soufani, J. Lam (2001)
A Study of Succession in a Family FirmFamily Business Review, 14
Vassilios Pyromalis, G. Vozikis, Theodoros Kalkanteras, George Sigalas (2006)
An Integrated Framework for Testing the Success of the Family Business Succession Process According to Gender Specificity
L. Gómez‐Mejía, Marianna Makri, Martín Kintana (2010)
Diversification Decisions in Family-Controlled FirmsERN: Governance & Ownership (Topic)
James Chrisman, J. Chua, Pramodita Sharma (2005)
Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family FirmEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29
D. Jaffe, Sam Lane (2004)
Sustaining a Family Dynasty: Key Issues Facing Complex Multigenerational Business- and Investment-Owning FamiliesFamily Business Review, 17
Ercilia García-Álvarez, J. López-Sintas (2001)
A Taxonomy of Founders Based on Values: The Root of Family Business HeterogeneityFamily Business Review, 14
Jill Thomas (2002)
Freeing the Shackles of Family Business OwnershipFamily Business Review, 15
S. Bae, D. Orlinsky (2004)
The experience of professional autonomy among psychotherapists in Korea and the United StatesInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28
G. Hodgson (2002)
Darwinism in economics: from analogy to ontologyJournal of Evolutionary Economics, 12
Pietro Mazzola, Gaia Marchisio, J. Astrachan (2006)
Using the Strategic Planning Process as a Next-Generation Training Tool in Family Business
N. Nicholson (2008)
Evolutionary Psychology, Organizational Culture, and the Family FirmAcademy of Management Perspectives, 22
F. Kellermanns (2005)
Family Firm Resource Management: Commentary and ExtensionsEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29
Josiane Fahed-Sreih (2008)
An exploratory study on a new corporate governance mechanismManagement Research News, 32
Matthew Sonfield, R. Lussier (2004)
First-, Second-, and Third-Generation Family Firms: A ComparisonFamily Business Review, 17
Gavin Wright (1982)
An evolutionary theory of economic changeTechnology in Society, 4
Pramodita Sharma, Pramodita Sharma, P. Irving (2005)
Four Bases of Family Business Successor Commitment: Antecedents and ConsequencesEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29
Isabelle Breton-Miller, Danny Miller, L. Steier (2004)
Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB SuccessionEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28
M. López-Navarro, César Camisón-Zornoza (2003)
The effect of group composition and autonomy on the performance of joint ventures (JVs): an analysis based on Spanish export JVsInternational Business Review, 12
N. Nicholson (2008)
Evolutionary Psychology and Family Business: A New Synthesis for Theory, Research, and PracticeFamily Business Review, 21
Daniel Mcconaughy, G. Phillips (1999)
Founders versus Descendants: The Profitability, Efficiency, Growth Characteristics and Financing in Large, Public, Founding-Family-Controlled FirmsFamily Business Review, 12
W. Handler (1992)
The Succession Experience of the Next GenerationFamily Business Review, 5
A. Hall, L. Melin, M. Nordqvist (2001)
Entrepreneurship as Radical Change in the Family Business: Exploring the Role of Cultural PatternsFamily Business Review, 14
R. Brockhaus (2004)
Family Business Succession: Suggestions for Future ResearchFamily Business Review, 17
G. Dosi, R. Nelson (1994)
An introduction to evolutionary theories in economicsJournal of Evolutionary Economics, 4
P.J. Perricone, J.R. Earle, I.M. Taplin
Continuity in family‐owned businesses: study of an ethnic community
Michael Ensley, Allison Pearson (2005)
An Exploratory Comparison of the Behavioral Dynamics of Top Management Teams in Family and Nonfamily New Ventures: Cohesion, Conflict, Potency, and ConsensusEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29
W. Handler (1994)
Succession in Family Business: A Review of the ResearchFamily Business Review, 7
Rebecca Reuber (2003)
Support for Rapid‐Growth Firms: A Comparison of the Views of Founders, Government Policymakers, and Private Sector Resource ProvidersJournal of Small Business Management, 41
J. Nadler, Nicole Cundiff, M. Lowery, S. Jackson (2010)
Perceptions of organizational attractiveness: The differential relationships of various work schedule flexibility programsManagement Research Review, 33
Richard Lester, Albert Cannella (2006)
Interorganizational Familiness: How Family Firms Use Interlocking Directorates to Build Community–Level Social Capital 1Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30
Peter Davis, P. Harveston (1999)
In the Founder's Shadow: Conflict in the Family FirmFamily Business Review, 12
J. Fahed‐Sreih
An exploratory study on a new corporate governance mechanism: evidence from small family firms
M. Koiranen (2002)
Over 100 Years of Age But Still Entrepreneurially Active in Business: Exploring the Values and Family Characteristics of Old Finnish Family FirmsFamily Business Review, 15
E. Venter, Christo Boshoff, Gideon Maas (2005)
The Influence of Successor-Related Factors on the Succession Process in Small and Medium-Sized Family BusinessesFamily Business Review, 18
P. Sharma, P.G. Irving
Four bases of family successor commitment: antecedents and consequences
C. Bamford, G. Bruton, Yvonne Hinson (2006)
Founder/Chief Executive Officer Exit: A Social Capital Perspective of New VenturesJournal of Small Business Management, 44
Pramodita Sharma, James Chrisman, J. Chua (2003)
Succession Planning as Planned Behavior: Some Empirical ResultsFamily Business Review, 16
P. Perricone, J. Earle, I. Taplin (2001)
Patterns of Succession and Continuity in Family-Owned Businesses: Study of an Ethnic CommunityFamily Business Review, 14
Ercilia García-Álvarez, J. López-Sintas, Pilar Gonzalvo (2002)
Socialization Patterns of Successors in First- to Second-Generation Family BusinessesFamily Business Review, 15
M.C.V. Martos, J. Kansikas
Epilogue: family business values as reflections of responsible ownership – a neoinstitutional perspective
Katiuska Cabrera-Suárez, Petra Saá-Pérez, Desiderio García-Almeida (2001)
The Succession Process from a Resource- and Knowledge-Based View of the Family FirmFamily Business Review, 14
Purpose – This qualitative study attempts to understand what kinds of evolutionary selection and variation occur in family businesses during the preparation of a managerial and ownership succession. Design/methodology/approach – The study was conducted by interviewing members of one family business in Louisiana, USA and one in Finland in order to contribute to the understanding of succession preparation in small family businesses with two generations. Evolutionary economics was adapted for this interdisciplinary study to explain evolutionary changes in a family business succession. Findings – The findings indicate that both selection and variation can take place through different routes during the preparatory phase of a family business succession. Selection is influenced both by the founder and next generations. However, it does not occur in company A due to the reluctance of the younger generation. In company B selection is processed through joint thinking and visioning. This will lead to variation which is shaped by both generations. Research limitations/implications – This study is based on qualitative interpretation. Limitations of the study are the small number of informants and the lack of generalization of the results. Practical implications – This study shows that selection and variation are intertwined. If selection does not occur in a family business, it leads to no variation between the generations. However, exits are possible; death and birth of companies are part of the life cycle of family businesses. Originality/value – Evolutionary thinking has not been studied recently among family firms except in the field of evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary thinking offers a variety of topics to study in the future.
Management Research Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 9, 2011
Keywords: Family business; Evolutionary economics; Succession; Interpretation; Next generation; Finland; United States of America
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.