Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evaluation of the university library service quality: analysis through focus group interviews

Evaluation of the university library service quality: analysis through focus group interviews Purpose – The purpose of this study is to clarify the indicators and measures that correspond to the dimensions of users' evaluation of university library service. Design/methodology/approach – In a previous study, the authors had clarified the four dimensions that construct the evaluation of service quality through factor analyses of the survey data. In this study, nine focus group interviews were undertaken, at the libraries of four universities in Japan, England and Finland. With the aim to recapture the four dimensions in the concrete contexts of library use, the transcripts were analyzed and mapped according to the dimensions: “Effect of Service – Personal,” “Library as ‘Ba’,” “Collection and Access” and “Effect of Service – Organizational.” Another goal of the FGIs was to find out what measures should be added to the questionnaire, if any. Findings – Usage scenarios were clarified for each user group – undergraduates, graduate students and faculty members, and the contents of interview statements were mapped to the tree based on the dimensions. As a result, the features and the background of four dimensions were revealed, and some clues for changes in the service quality assessment instrument were extracted. Research limitations/implications – Though the interviews were conducted in international/diverse contexts, it is necessary to be discreet about generalization and further examinations are required. Originality/value – This article addresses considerations important to the service quality assessment in university libraries. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Performance Measurement and Metrics Emerald Publishing

Evaluation of the university library service quality: analysis through focus group interviews

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/evaluation-of-the-university-library-service-quality-analysis-through-mJKbQhfqMF
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1467-8047
DOI
10.1108/14678040510636748
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to clarify the indicators and measures that correspond to the dimensions of users' evaluation of university library service. Design/methodology/approach – In a previous study, the authors had clarified the four dimensions that construct the evaluation of service quality through factor analyses of the survey data. In this study, nine focus group interviews were undertaken, at the libraries of four universities in Japan, England and Finland. With the aim to recapture the four dimensions in the concrete contexts of library use, the transcripts were analyzed and mapped according to the dimensions: “Effect of Service – Personal,” “Library as ‘Ba’,” “Collection and Access” and “Effect of Service – Organizational.” Another goal of the FGIs was to find out what measures should be added to the questionnaire, if any. Findings – Usage scenarios were clarified for each user group – undergraduates, graduate students and faculty members, and the contents of interview statements were mapped to the tree based on the dimensions. As a result, the features and the background of four dimensions were revealed, and some clues for changes in the service quality assessment instrument were extracted. Research limitations/implications – Though the interviews were conducted in international/diverse contexts, it is necessary to be discreet about generalization and further examinations are required. Originality/value – This article addresses considerations important to the service quality assessment in university libraries.

Journal

Performance Measurement and MetricsEmerald Publishing

Published: Dec 1, 2005

Keywords: Customer services quality; Focus groups; University libraries; Japan; United Kingdom; Finland

References