Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/evaluation-of-participants-contributions-in-knowledge-creation-based-AaXReUFL1U
References (25)
-
A. Collins, E. Loftus (1975)
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processingPsychological Review, 82
-
K. Hasida (2003)
Semantic Authoring and Semantic Computing -
N. Matsumura, Y. Ohsawa, M. Ishizuka (2003)
Profiling participants in online-community based on influence diffusion modelTransactions of The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 18
-
N. Igata, H. Tsuda, I. Watanabe, K. Matsui
Semantic Groupware: an approach to KNOW‐WHO using RDF -
Tsujii, S. Ananiadou (1997)
Information retrieval and natural language processing -
This Is a Publication of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence -
J. Novak, D. Gowin, J. Kahle (1984)
Learning How to Learn -
R. Lorch (1982)
Priming and search processes in semantic memory: a test of three models of spreading activationJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21
-
C. Chesñevar, Ana Maguitman, R. Loui (2000)
Logical models of argumentACM Comput. Surv., 32
-
D. Balota, R. Lorch (1986)
Depth of Automatic Spreading Activation: Mediated Priming Effects in Pronunciation but Not in Lexical DecisionJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12
-
J. Reich, Peter Brockhausen, T. Lau, U. Reimer (2002)
Ontology-Based Skills Management: Goals, Opportunities and ChallengesJ. Univers. Comput. Sci., 8
-
Tetsuro Kotani, K. Seki, T. Matsui, Toshio Okamoto (2004)
Development of Discussion Supporting System Based on theTransactions of The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
-
John Anderson (1983)
A spreading activation theory of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22
-
I. Debourges, S. Guilloré‐Billot, C. Vrain
Learning verbal relations in text maps -
K. Fukuzawa
Lesson of Discussion -
C. Marshall, F. Halasz, R. Rogers, William Janssen (1991)
Aquanet: a hypertext tool to hold your knowledge in place -
H.T. Davenport, L. Prusak
Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know -
S. Toulmin (1960)
The uses of argument -
Y. Matsuo, H. Tomobe, K. Hasida, H. Nakashima, M. Ishizuka (2005)
Social Network Extraction from the Web informationTransactions of The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 20
-
T. Kotani, K. Seki, T. Matsui, T. Okamoto
Development of discussion supporting system based on the ‘value of favorable words’ influence -
A. Wensley (1998)
Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6Knowledge and Process Management, 5
-
H. Kautz, B. Selman, M. Shah
The hidden web -
S. Brin, Lawrence Page (1998)
The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search EngineComput. Networks, 30
-
J. Conklin, M. Begeman (1988)
gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion -
T. Winograd, F. Flores (1986)
Understanding computers and cognition
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2007 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 0969-6474
- DOI
- 10.1108/09696470710739426
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate participants' contributions to the development of discussion and knowledge creation as organizational knowledge management, and thereby help them better develop the discussion. Design/methodology/approach – To evaluate participants' contributions more accurately, a method which analyzes discussion structures by Discourse Semantic Authoring was employed, which represents discussion structures explicitly in terms of discourse and dialogue relations. Findings – The method successfully evaluates participants based on the content of their comments rather than their number. More fine‐grain semantic structure should be considered in order to improve the accuracy of this evaluation. Originality/value – This paper presents a first attempt to analyze discussion structures to evaluate participants' contributions.
Journal
The Learning Organization – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 24, 2007
Keywords: Knowledge creation; Project evaluation; Semantics; Authoring languages; Employee participation; Content management