Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Ethnographic reflections on access to care services

Ethnographic reflections on access to care services The purpose of this paper is twofold: to explore how gatekeepers’ ways of regulating the researchers’ access to knowledge in/about care services reflect the systemic and interpersonal values that inform Danish welfare systems’ daily workings at the street level; and also explore how the authors’ methodological experiences mirror the value-informed regulatory strategies that professionals and users themselves experience in their daily encounters in the same local practices that the authors have studied.Design/methodology/approachThe paper takes its empirical point of departure in a multisited ethnographic field study of the management of citizens with complex problems in Danish welfare systems.FindingsBy means of Michael Lipsky’s outline of access regulation, the authors will analyze the following regulatory strategies that are identified during the fieldwork: “Gatekeepers’ sympathy and creaming,” “Queuing and delay,” and ‘Withdrawal of consent and “no resources.” The paper suggests that trust, shared goals and sympathy seem to be key to the process of getting access.Originality/valueDespite principles of neutrality, equal rights and access to services in welfare systems, the authors’ experiences thus tend to support other research within bureaucratic and care organizations, which has found that interpersonal relations, sympathy, dislikes, norms and values, etc., can heavily influence timely access to services, tailored information and support. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Organizational Ethnography Emerald Publishing

Ethnographic reflections on access to care services

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/ethnographic-reflections-on-access-to-care-services-K0oXnH1k81
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2046-6749
DOI
10.1108/joe-12-2017-0064
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold: to explore how gatekeepers’ ways of regulating the researchers’ access to knowledge in/about care services reflect the systemic and interpersonal values that inform Danish welfare systems’ daily workings at the street level; and also explore how the authors’ methodological experiences mirror the value-informed regulatory strategies that professionals and users themselves experience in their daily encounters in the same local practices that the authors have studied.Design/methodology/approachThe paper takes its empirical point of departure in a multisited ethnographic field study of the management of citizens with complex problems in Danish welfare systems.FindingsBy means of Michael Lipsky’s outline of access regulation, the authors will analyze the following regulatory strategies that are identified during the fieldwork: “Gatekeepers’ sympathy and creaming,” “Queuing and delay,” and ‘Withdrawal of consent and “no resources.” The paper suggests that trust, shared goals and sympathy seem to be key to the process of getting access.Originality/valueDespite principles of neutrality, equal rights and access to services in welfare systems, the authors’ experiences thus tend to support other research within bureaucratic and care organizations, which has found that interpersonal relations, sympathy, dislikes, norms and values, etc., can heavily influence timely access to services, tailored information and support.

Journal

Journal of Organizational Ethnography – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 2, 2019

Keywords: Policy; Accessibility; Bureaucracy; Thresholds; Care values; Multisited ethnography

References

  • The twilight zone: paradoxes of practicing reform
    Bjerge, B.; Bjerregaard, T.
  • Empowered and self-managing users in methadone treatment?
    Bjerge, B.; Nielsen, B.
  • Complex cases – complex policies
    Bjerge, B.; Christensen, L.; Oute, J.
  • How did I get here? The social process of accessing field sites
    Bondy, C.
  • Paradoksal psykiatri: etnografiske analyser af samspillet mellem plejepersonale og patienter i dansk retspsykiatri: Ph.d.-afhandling
    Bredahl Jacobsen, C.
  • Inside the welfare contract: discretion and accountability in state welfare administration
    Brodkin, E.Z.
  • Metaphors of change: descriptions of changes within the practice of social work for socially marginalized people
    Christensen, L.
  • The concept of recovery as an organizing principle for integrating mental health and addiction services
    Davidson, L.; White, W.L.
  • Empowerment in drug treatment: dilemmas in implementing policy in welfare institutions
    Frank, V.A.; Bjerge, B.
  • Professionals’ involvement of relatives – only good intentions?
    Glasdam, S.; Oute, J.
  • What role does employment play in dual recovery? A qualitative meta-synthesis of cross-cutting studies treating substance use treatment, psychiatry and unemployment services
    Hansen, J.O.; Bjerge, B.
  • Ethics as a form of regulation: a historical sketch
    Hoeyer, K.
  • Conflicting notions of research ethics. The mutually challenging traditions of social scientists and medical researchers
    Hoeyer, K.; Dahlager, L.; Lynoe, N.
  • Control and welfare in Danish drug policy
    Houborg, E.
  • Does core task matter for decision-making? A comparative case study on whether differences in job characteristics affect discretionary street-level decision-making
    Jensen, D.C.
  • Protecting vulnerable research participants: a Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees
    Juritzen, T.I.; Grimen, H.; Heggen, K.
  • Sociality in Methadone treatment: understanding methadone treatment and service delivery as a social process
    Lilly, R.; Quirk, A.; Rhodes, T.; Stimson, G.V.
  • Constructing at-risk target groups
    Møller, M.Ø.; Harrits, G.S.
  • Facilitators and barriers in dual recovery: a literature review of first-person perspectives
    Ness, O.; Borg, M.; Davidson, L.
  • A case study of casework tinkering: qualitative studies
    Nygaard-Christensen, M.; Bjerge, B.; Oute, J.
  • ‘It is a bit like being a parent’: a discourse analysis of how nursing identity can contextualize patient involvement in Danish psychiatry
    Oute, J.
  • How is the management of citizens with complex problems portrayed in psychiatric, drug treatment and employment records? Scientific publication
    Oute, J.; Davidson, L.; Bjerge, B.
  • ‘Men just drink more than women. Women have friends to talk to’ – gendered understandings of depression among healthcare professionals and their implications
    Oute, J.; Tondora, J.; Glasdam, S.
  • The politics of mental illness and involvement: a discourse analysis of Danish anti-stigma and social inclusion campaigns
    Oute, J.; Huniche, L.; Nielsen, C.T.; Petersen, A.
  • Experiences of adults providing care to a partner or relative with depression: a meta-ethnographic synthesis
    Priestley, J.; Mcpherson, S.
  • A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers
    Reeves, C.L.
  • Vejledning om den sociale indsats for de mest udsatte voksne: sindslidende, stof- og alkoholmisbrugere
  • Socialpolitisk redegørelse
  • Sundhedsloven (Danish Health Law) (1188)
  • Referenceprogram for unipolar depression hos voksne
  • People processing: strategies of organizational socialization
    Van Maanen, J.