Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Eduardo Ferraz, Lucio Andrade, Aline Santos, V. Torregrossa, Maria Freire, V. Sarmento (2011)
Effect of different surface processing protocols in three-dimensional images for rapid prototypingAdv. Eng. Softw., 42
J. Meakin, D. Shepherd, D. Hukins (2004)
Fused deposition models from CT scansBritish Journal of Radiology, 77
Junghee Choi, Jung-Ah Choi, N. Kim, Young-Youn Kim, Jong-Ki Lee, Myonghwhan Kim, Joon-Kyu Lee, Myonghwhan Kim (2002)
Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models.International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 31 1
T. Barker, W. Earwaker, D. Lisle (1994)
Accuracy of stereolithographic models of human anatomy.Australasian radiology, 38 2
D. Sarment, P. Sukovic, Neal Clinthorne (2003)
Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 18 4
A. Garwin
Measuring Adult Human Remains
Stratasys
Insight, V3.1
W. Lill, P. Solar, C. Ulm, G. Watzek, R. Blahout, M. Matejka (1992)
Reproducibility of three-dimensional CT-assisted model production in the maxillofacial area.The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 30 4
J. Bouyssié, S. Bouyssié, P. Sharrock, D. Duran (1997)
Stereolithographic models derived from X-ray computed tomography - Reproduction accuracySurgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 19
J. Kragskov, S. Sindet‐Pedersen, C. Gyldensted, K. Jensen (1996)
A comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography scans and stereolithographic models for evaluation of craniofacial anomalies.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 54 4
Materialise
Magics v9.9
A. Nizam, L. Naing (2006)
Dimensional Accuracy of the Skull Models Produced by Rapid Prototyping Technology Using Stereolithography Apparatus
C. Arrieta, S. Uribe, J. Ramos-Grez, A. Vargas, P. Irarrazaval, Vicente Parot, C. Tejos (2012)
Quantitative assessments of geometric errors for rapid prototyping in medical applicationsRapid Prototyping Journal, 18
InVesalius
InVesalius Software
D.D.S. Santler, D.D.S. Kärcher, D.D.S. Gaggl, R. Kern (1998)
Stereolithography versus milled three-dimensional models: comparison of production method, indication, and accuracy.Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery, 3 5
Purpose – Recent advancement in fused deposition modelling (FDM) rapid prototyping technology has made it a viable technology for application in reconstructive surgery. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the errors generated during the fabrication stage of complex anatomical replicas derived from computed tomography coupled with the technique of FDM. Design/methodology/approach – An evaluation on the errors generated during the fabrication process of two anatomical parts (skull or mandible) for different human sizes (infant, female or male) is carried out. A comparison between the linear measurements of 11 landmarks on the virtual model of a skull and nine for the mandible of patient specific and its replica is conducted. Furthermore, eight landmarks are chosen to evaluate the bone thickness variation over the fabricated replicas. Findings – Although the FDM technology proved the ability to manufacture and to fit prosthesis to a patient's unique proportions quickly and with relatively low cost, the model accuracy is a key factor to the applicability of such technology. The results show undersized replicas with an overall absolute average deviation of 0.24 per cent with an average standard deviation of 0.16 per cent of the skull models and 0.22 per cent with a 0.11 per cent standard deviation of the mandibles. Furthermore, a high level of accuracy is reflected in the representation of the measured bone thickness with deviations in the order of 100th of a millimetre being reported. Originality/value – The paper demonstrates an outstanding accuracy using FDM process for the fabrication of anatomical replicas using models of different human sizes and gender in comparison to other established rapid prototyping techniques.
Rapid Prototyping Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 19, 2010
Keywords: Rapid prototypes; Modelling; Human anatomy; Computer aided design; Error analysis
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.