Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Environmentalists NGOs and the construction of the culprit: semiotic analysis

Environmentalists NGOs and the construction of the culprit: semiotic analysis Purpose – This article aims to analyse how environmentalist NGOs build the figures of guilty and evil businesses in texts published on the web sites of two ironic prizes. These texts are good examples of criticism based on reversing and analysing semiotic productions of organisations, like advertising and environmental reports, as a part of on‐line environmentalist campaigns. Design/methodology/approach – The article is based on textual semiotics and a semiotic‐based approach to rhetoric; the methodology is qualitative and exploratory. A part of the text published on the web sites of the two ironic prizes (Pinocchio and Angry Mermaid) are analysed in order to identify different models and strategies of criticism. Findings – The article identifies a series of critical strategies: semantic/paradigmatic, syntagmatic/meta‐textual, referential, narrative and inter‐textual criticisms. It underlines the fact that on‐line criticism is an anti‐ideological semiotic action, which can be compared to some forms of ecological thought. Nonetheless, it is based on some forms of rhetoric and ideology, which can be analysed with semiotic tools. Research limitations/implications – This paper presents a qualitative, exploratory analysis of two cases: results cannot be directly generalized, but methodology and findings can be transferred to other cases (epistemological principle of transferability). Practical implications – Methods and results of this paper can help in enriching research on the rhetoric of environmental communication, and can integrate more quantitative approaches. Results can suggest new approaches to business communicators, in order to avoid environmental criticism and “boomerang effects”. Originality/value – The attempt to apply semiotics to the analysis of communication campaigns is rare and perhaps quite innovative. The approach can enrich the fields of PR and business communication studies, of rhetoric analysis and of environmental communication analysis. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Communication Management Emerald Publishing

Environmentalists NGOs and the construction of the culprit: semiotic analysis

Andrea Catellani
Journal of Communication Management , Volume 15 (4): 18 – Nov 15, 2011
Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/environmentalists-ngos-and-the-construction-of-the-culprit-semiotic-Gbv24zYxsB
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1363-254X
DOI
10.1108/13632541111183343
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This article aims to analyse how environmentalist NGOs build the figures of guilty and evil businesses in texts published on the web sites of two ironic prizes. These texts are good examples of criticism based on reversing and analysing semiotic productions of organisations, like advertising and environmental reports, as a part of on‐line environmentalist campaigns. Design/methodology/approach – The article is based on textual semiotics and a semiotic‐based approach to rhetoric; the methodology is qualitative and exploratory. A part of the text published on the web sites of the two ironic prizes (Pinocchio and Angry Mermaid) are analysed in order to identify different models and strategies of criticism. Findings – The article identifies a series of critical strategies: semantic/paradigmatic, syntagmatic/meta‐textual, referential, narrative and inter‐textual criticisms. It underlines the fact that on‐line criticism is an anti‐ideological semiotic action, which can be compared to some forms of ecological thought. Nonetheless, it is based on some forms of rhetoric and ideology, which can be analysed with semiotic tools. Research limitations/implications – This paper presents a qualitative, exploratory analysis of two cases: results cannot be directly generalized, but methodology and findings can be transferred to other cases (epistemological principle of transferability). Practical implications – Methods and results of this paper can help in enriching research on the rhetoric of environmental communication, and can integrate more quantitative approaches. Results can suggest new approaches to business communicators, in order to avoid environmental criticism and “boomerang effects”. Originality/value – The attempt to apply semiotics to the analysis of communication campaigns is rare and perhaps quite innovative. The approach can enrich the fields of PR and business communication studies, of rhetoric analysis and of environmental communication analysis.

Journal

Journal of Communication Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 15, 2011

Keywords: Corporate communication; Environment management; Ethics; Sustainable development; Semiotics; Rhetoric

References

  • Questions of Literature and Aesthetics
    Bakhtin, M.
  • Précis de sémiotique littéraire
    Bertrand, D.
  • Les relations publiques. Refonder la confiance entre les entreprises, les marques et leurs publics
    Billiet, S.
  • Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research
    Boje, D.M.
  • Lists and stories as organizational communication
    Browning, L.D.
  • Responsabilité sociale: vers une nouvelle communication des entreprises?
    De la Broise, P.; Lamarche, T.
  • La dialectique entre listes et récits au sein des organisations
    Boudès, P.T.
  • Storytelling in Organizations: Why Storytelling Is Transforming 21st Century Organizations and Management
    Brown, J.S.; Denning, S.; Groh, K.; Prusak, L.
  • Envols d'amour
    Careri, G.
  • Interpenetrazioni visive: dal Traité du signe visuel del Gruppo di Liegi alla semiotica tensiva
    Catellani, A.
  • La justification et la présentation des démarches de responsabilité sociétale dans la communication corporate: notes d'analyse textuelle d'une nouvelle rhétorique épidictique
    Catellani, A.
  • Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere
    Cox, R.
  • The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility
    Crane, A.; McWilliams, A.; Matten, D.
  • Narratives in Social Science Research
    Czarniawska, B.
  • La société du jugement
    D'Almeida, N.
  • A Theory of Semiotics
    Eco, U.
  • The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts
    Eco, U.
  • Semiotics, Marketing and Communication: Beneath the Signs, the Strategies
    Floch, J.‐M.
  • Sémiotique du discours et tensions rhétoriques
    Fontanille, J.; Bordron, J.‐F. (Eds)
  • La communication des nouvelles éthiques de l'entreprise: responsabilité sociale, développement durable, mode et design éthiques
    Gardere, E.; Gramaccia, G.
  • Basic Concepts for Qualitative Research
    Holloway, I.
  • L'optique du sustainable: territoires médiatisés et savoirs visibles
    Jeanneret, Y.
  • La formule ‘développement durable’: un opérateur de neutralisation de la conflictualité
    Krieg‐Planque, A.
  • Social accountability and corporate greenwashing
    Laufer, W.
  • Corporate responsibility and public relations ethics
    L'Etang, J.
  • Communication et environnement, le pacte impossible
    Libaert, T.
  • No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behaviour
    Meyrowitz, J.
  • C'est quoi l'idée? Création, publicité et société de consommation
    Michel, P.
  • Communication des associations
    Pierlot, J.‐M.; Libaert, T.
  • Storytelling
    Salmon, C.
  • Utilisation de l'argument citoyen dans les campagnes de communication des enterprises: analyse des risques dans la perspective d'une crise
    Swaen, V.; Vanhamme, J.
  • Community and society: corporate social responsibility (CSR)
    Tench, R.
  • Éléments de grammaire tensive
    Zilberberg, C.