Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Environmental turmoil and firms’ core structure dynamism: the moderating role of strategic alliances

Environmental turmoil and firms’ core structure dynamism: the moderating role of strategic alliances Much of the extant evidence in the marketing literature posits that firms use strategic alliances to share resources, costs and risks as paths to performance improvements. Drawing from the organizational ecology theory, this study aims to propose a different rationale, namely, that strategic alliances protect a firm’s core structure – its stated goals, authority structure, core technologies and marketing strategies – by mitigating the need for hazardous changes in hostile environments.Design/methodology/approachThis study collected quantitative data using market survey and analyzed the data with the regression method.FindingsUsing Chinese firms in three technology industries as the research setting, this research finds a positive and significant relationship between environmental hostility and core structure dynamism. Although strategic alliances themselves have no direct bearing on core structure dynamism, they are found to moderate this relationship negatively, that is, strategic alliances attenuate the relationship between environmental hostility and structural changes.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper argues that strategic alliances have significant moderating effects on firm performance, that is, firms use strategic alliances to outsource competence to partners and, thus, avoid internal turmoil. However, the moderating effect alone cannot explain the complexity of strategic alliances. There could exist other effects that remain unknown. In addition, individual-level factors could have significant impacts on strategic alliance management. Future studies should look into these issues to advance the authors’ knowledge on strategic alliances.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study show that managers should outsource competence to partners when they experience turmoil in markets. Adapting to market turmoil internally could lead to market failure.Originality/valueThis study provides a new rationale for strategic alliances, that is, firms use strategic alliances to reduce market uncertainty. This rationale has not been reported in the existing literature. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing Emerald Publishing

Environmental turmoil and firms’ core structure dynamism: the moderating role of strategic alliances

Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/environmental-turmoil-and-firms-core-structure-dynamism-the-moderating-my1INGA6no
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0885-8624
DOI
10.1108/jbim-11-2018-0330
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Much of the extant evidence in the marketing literature posits that firms use strategic alliances to share resources, costs and risks as paths to performance improvements. Drawing from the organizational ecology theory, this study aims to propose a different rationale, namely, that strategic alliances protect a firm’s core structure – its stated goals, authority structure, core technologies and marketing strategies – by mitigating the need for hazardous changes in hostile environments.Design/methodology/approachThis study collected quantitative data using market survey and analyzed the data with the regression method.FindingsUsing Chinese firms in three technology industries as the research setting, this research finds a positive and significant relationship between environmental hostility and core structure dynamism. Although strategic alliances themselves have no direct bearing on core structure dynamism, they are found to moderate this relationship negatively, that is, strategic alliances attenuate the relationship between environmental hostility and structural changes.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper argues that strategic alliances have significant moderating effects on firm performance, that is, firms use strategic alliances to outsource competence to partners and, thus, avoid internal turmoil. However, the moderating effect alone cannot explain the complexity of strategic alliances. There could exist other effects that remain unknown. In addition, individual-level factors could have significant impacts on strategic alliance management. Future studies should look into these issues to advance the authors’ knowledge on strategic alliances.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study show that managers should outsource competence to partners when they experience turmoil in markets. Adapting to market turmoil internally could lead to market failure.Originality/valueThis study provides a new rationale for strategic alliances, that is, firms use strategic alliances to reduce market uncertainty. This rationale has not been reported in the existing literature.

Journal

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 7, 2019

Keywords: Strategic alliances; Core structure dynamism; Environmental turmoil

References

  • The roles of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: an experimental investigation
    Agarwal, R.; Croson, R.; Mahoney, J.
  • The complexity of context: a service ecosystems approach for international marketing
    Akaka, M.; Vargo, S.; Lusch, R.
  • Resetting the clock: the dynamics of organizational change and failure
    Amburgey, T.L.; Kelly, D.; Barnett, W.
  • Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach
    Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W.
  • Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: a large-scale networked experiment
    Aral, S.; Walker, D.
  • Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization
    Argyres, N.
  • Decision making under uncertainty when preference information is incomplete
    Armbruster, B.; Delage, E.
  • B2B technology adoption in customer driven supply chains
    Asare, A.K.; Brashear-Alejandro, T.G.; Kang, J.
  • Modeling internal organizational change
    Barnett, P.; Carroll, G.
  • Alliance market orientation, new product development, and resource advantage theory
    Bicen, P.; Hunt, S.
  • Changing routines: a process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D
    Bresman, H.
  • Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: a resource-based view
    Capron, L.; Hulland, J.
  • Mobilising resources to bridge technological discontinuities
    Chou, H.H.
  • Strategic change and termination of interfirm partnerships
    Cui, A.; Calantone, R.; Griffith, D.
  • Information sharing in supply chains: an empirical and theoretical valuation
    Cui, R.; Allon, G.; Bassamboo, A.; Van Mieghem, J.A.
  • Optimal structure, market dynamism and the strategy of simple rules
    Davis, J.; Eisenhardt, K.; Bingham, C.
  • Boards, CEOs and surviving a financial crisis: evidence from the internet shakeout
    Dowell, G.; Shackell, M.B.
  • Accelerating adaptive processes, product innovation and global computer industry
    Eisenhardt, K.M.; Tabrizi, B.N.
  • Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
    Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F.
  • Unbundling the structure of inertia: resources versus routine rigidity
    Gilbert, C.
  • Alliance networks and firm performance: the impact of repeated partnerships
    Goerzen, A.
  • Living in a global world: influence of consumer global orientation on attitudes toward global brands from developed versus emerging countries
    Guo, X.
  • Structural inertia and organizational change
    Hannan, M.T.; Freeman, J.
  • Cascading organizational change
    Hannan, M.T.; Polos, L.; Carroll, G.
  • International diversification: effects of innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms
    Hitt, M.A.; Hoskisson, R.E.; Kim, H.
  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives
    Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M.
  • Managing strategic supplier relationships: antecedents and outcomes
    Jack, E.P.; Powers, T.L.
  • Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations
    Jay, J.
  • A Meta-analytic review of influence strategies in marketing channel relationship
    Johnston, W.J.; Le, A.; Cheng, J.
  • Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental changes, and strategy on firm performance
    Koka, B.; Prescott, J.
  • Structural marketing: using organizational structure to achieve marketing objectives
    Lee, J.-Y.; Kozlenkova, I.; Palmatier, R.
  • Do partners in international strategic alliances share resources, costs, and risks
    Li, L.; Qian, G.; Qian, Z.
  • Inconsistencies in international product strategies and firm performance
    Li, L.; Qian, G.; Qian, Z.
  • Should small, young technology-based firms internalize transactions in their internationalization?
    Li, L.; Qian, G.; Qian, Z.
  • General alliance experience, uncertainty, and marketing alliance governance mode choice
    Li, N.; Boulding, W.; Staelin, R.
  • Inertia, uncertainty, and exploratory partner selection
    Liang, J.; Mei, N.
  • Alliance partners and firm performance: resource complementarity and status association
    Lin, Z.; Yang, H.; Arya, B.
  • Are joint venture partnerships more opportunistic in a more volatile environment?
    Luo, Y.
  • Age-related structural inertia: a distance-based approach
    Mens, L.; Hannan, M.; Polos, L.
  • Business, industrial marketing and uncertainty
    Merigó, J.M.; Gil-Lafuente, A.M.; Gil-Lafuente, J.
  • Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness
    Meyer, K.E.; Mudambi, R.; Narula, R.
  • Strategic interaction in alliance
    Panico, C.
  • A logical approach to formalizing organizational ecology
    Peli, G.; Bruggeman, J.; Masuch, M.; Nuallain, B.
  • Behavioral strategy
    Powell, T.; Lovallo, D.; Fox, C.
  • Profitability of small- and medium-sized enterprises in high-tech industries: the case of the biotechnology industry
    Qian, G.; Li, L.
  • Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance
    Qian, G.; Li, L.; Rugman, A.
  • The performance implications of intra- and inter-regional geographic diversification
    Qian, G.; Khoury, T.A.; Peng, M.W.; Qian, Z.
  • Goal configuration in a global industry context
    Roth, K.; Ricks, D.A.
  • Re-conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal’s classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise
    Rugman, A.; Verbeke, A.; Yuan, W.
  • Exploration of capability and role development in an emerging technology network
    Salehi, F.; Zolkiewski, J.; Perks, H.; Bahreini, M.
  • On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: the nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism
    Schilke, O.
  • Information sharing in a supply chain with a common retailer
    Shang, W.; Ha, A.Y.; Tong, S.
  • Speed and search: designing organizations for turbulence and complexity
    Siggelkow, N.; Rivkin, J.W.
  • Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box
    Sirmon, D.; Hitt, M.A.; Ireland, R.D.
  • New product performance and the benefit of periodically changing the relative influence balance between marketing and R&D
    Situmeang, F.; Leenders, M.; Wijinberg, N.
  • Marketing’s contribution to the implementation of business strategy: an empirical analysis
    Slater, S.; Olson, E.M.
  • Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments
    Stieglitz, N.; Knudsen, T.; Becker, M.
  • What executives notice: accurate perceptions in top management team?
    Sutcliffe, K.M.
  • Dynamics capabilities and strategic management
    Teece, D.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A.
  • Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises
    Varadarajan, R.
  • The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between network structures and the innovative performance of a new venture
    Wang, M.-C.; Fang, S.-C.
  • Trust, Guanxi, and cooperation: a study on partner opportunism in Chinese joint venture manufacturing
    Xue, J.; Lu, S.; Shi, B.; Zheng, H.
  • How do an alliance firm’s strategic orientations drive its knowledge acquisition? Evidence from Sino-foreign alliance partnership
    Yang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.
  • The influence of suppliers on buyer market competitiveness: an opportunism perspective
    Yen, Y.-X.; Hung, S.-W.
  • Inertia in routines: a hidden source of organizational variation
    Yi, S.; Knudsen, T.; Becker, M.
  • Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship - performance relationships: a longitudinal analysis
    Zahra, S.A.; Covin, J.G.
  • International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: the moderating effect of international environmental hostility
    Zahra, S.A.; Garvis, D.M.
  • Strategic motives for international alliance formation
    Glaister, K.; Buckley, P.
  • Alliances and networks
    Gulati, R.
  • Strategic alliances as a pathway to competitive success
    Ireland, R.D.; Hitt, M.A.; Vaidyanath, D.
  • Balancing exploration and exploration in alliance formation
    Lavie, D.; Rosenkopf, L.