Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Environmental liabilities and diversity in practice under international financial reporting standards

Environmental liabilities and diversity in practice under international financial reporting... PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to encourage accounting regulators to address diversity in practice in the reporting of environmental liabilities. When Canada changed to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in 2011, Canadian regulators asked the IFRS Interpretations Committee to interpret whether the discount rate to value environmental liabilities should be a risk-free discount rate. Old Canadian GAAP, and current US GAAP, allow for a higher discount rate, resulting in commensurately lower liabilities. International regulators refused to address this issue expecting no diversity in practice in Canada.Design/methodology/approachThe focus is on a sample of Canadian oil and gas and mining firms. These domestic industries play a major role internationally and have significant environmental liabilities. The method is empirical archival, tracking firm characteristics and discount rate choice on transition to IFRS.FindingsThere is significant diversity in practice. About one-third of the sample firms choose a higher discount rate, avoiding a major increase in environmental liabilities on transition to IFRS. The evidence suggests that these firms have relatively larger environmental liabilities and that the discount rate decision is a strategic choice.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample is based on one country and may only be reflecting local anomalies that have no broader implications.Practical implicationsDiversity in practice in accounting for environmental liabilities is not acceptable. Accounting regulators should act to create consistent and comparable reporting practice.Social implicationsFirms and managers facing larger environmental liabilities can choose to minimize environmental liabilities under IFRS, while it is the general public and society at large that bear the ultimate risk.Originality/valueThe paper pushes forward the debate on whether recognized environmental liabilities should reflect the interests of equity investors, or if other investors and stakeholders should be taken into account. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal Emerald Publishing

Environmental liabilities and diversity in practice under international financial reporting standards

Download PDF
26 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/environmental-liabilities-and-diversity-in-practice-under-8pI023ib4z

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0951-3574
DOI
10.1108/AAAJ-01-2014-1585
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to encourage accounting regulators to address diversity in practice in the reporting of environmental liabilities. When Canada changed to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in 2011, Canadian regulators asked the IFRS Interpretations Committee to interpret whether the discount rate to value environmental liabilities should be a risk-free discount rate. Old Canadian GAAP, and current US GAAP, allow for a higher discount rate, resulting in commensurately lower liabilities. International regulators refused to address this issue expecting no diversity in practice in Canada.Design/methodology/approachThe focus is on a sample of Canadian oil and gas and mining firms. These domestic industries play a major role internationally and have significant environmental liabilities. The method is empirical archival, tracking firm characteristics and discount rate choice on transition to IFRS.FindingsThere is significant diversity in practice. About one-third of the sample firms choose a higher discount rate, avoiding a major increase in environmental liabilities on transition to IFRS. The evidence suggests that these firms have relatively larger environmental liabilities and that the discount rate decision is a strategic choice.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample is based on one country and may only be reflecting local anomalies that have no broader implications.Practical implicationsDiversity in practice in accounting for environmental liabilities is not acceptable. Accounting regulators should act to create consistent and comparable reporting practice.Social implicationsFirms and managers facing larger environmental liabilities can choose to minimize environmental liabilities under IFRS, while it is the general public and society at large that bear the ultimate risk.Originality/valueThe paper pushes forward the debate on whether recognized environmental liabilities should reflect the interests of equity investors, or if other investors and stakeholders should be taken into account.

Journal

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 20, 2017

References

  • Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality? Preliminary evidence
  • Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy
  • Quantitative techniques for the assessment of credit risk
  • International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors
  • Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research
  • Estimation and market valuation of environmental liabilities relating to superfund sites
  • Relevance of differences between net income based on IFRS and domestic standards for European firms
  • Accounting discretion in fair value estimates: an examination of SFAS 142 goodwill impairments
  • The impact of financial reporting regulation on the market valuation of reported environmental liabilities: preliminary evidence from US and Canadian public companies
  • The importance of reporting incentives: earnings management in European private and public firms
  • Re: proposed agenda item for IFRS Interpretation Committee IAS 37: inclusion of credit risk in measurement of provisions
    Canadian Accounting Standards Board