Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Five Freedoms
Animal welfare council
(1992)
Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health
J. Hailman, A. Leopold (1969)
A Sand Country Almanac, 40
J. Lovelock
Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth
P. Singer
Animal Liberation
Yves Laberge (2007)
The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human UnderstandingComplicity: An International Journal of Complexity in Education, 4
H. Jonas (1985)
The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age
(1995)
Animal Liberation, Pimlico, London
L. Zsolnai (1996)
Environmental Ethics for BusinessManagement Research News, 19
(1990)
Towards a Transpersonal Ecology
Antonio Tencati, L. Zsolnai (2012)
Collaborative Enterprise and Sustainability: The Case of Slow FoodJournal of Business Ethics, 110
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to derive operational principles from environmental ethics for business organizations to achieve sustainability. Design/methodology/approach – The paper analyses different levels on which business affects the natural environment. Individual biological creatures are affected by business via hunting, fishing, agriculture, animal testing, etc. Natural ecosystems are affected by business via mining, regulating rivers, building, polluting the air, water and land, etc. The Earth as a whole is affected by business via exterminating species, contributing to climate change, etc. Findings – Business has a natural, non‐reciprocal responsibility toward natural beings affected by its functioning. At the level of individual biological creatures, awareness‐based ethics is adequate for business. At the level of natural ecosystems, ecosystem ethics is relevant for business. At the level of the Earth as a whole, Gaian ethics applies to business. Practical implications – A business activity system can be considered acceptable if: its aggregate impact on animal welfare is non‐negative;, its aggregate impact on ecosystem health is non‐negative; and its aggregate impact on the living planet is non‐negative. By satisfying the above criteria, business can performs its duty: not to harm nature or allow others to come to harm. Originality/value – The paper uses principles of environmental ethics to redefine business sustainability in an ethically meaningful way.
International Journal of Social Economics – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 27, 2011
Keywords: Business ethics; Corporate social responsibility; Ecology; Ecosystems; Environmental responsibility; Animal welfare; Ecosystem health; Living planet; Aggregate impact of business on nature
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.