Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Tan, M. Xie, E. Chia (1998)
Quality function deployment and its use in designing information technology systemsInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15
C. Tan (2003)
Customer‐focused build‐in reliability: a case studyInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20
Ling Wang, Yi-Kai Juan, Jie Wang, Kai-Meng Li, Colin Ong (2012)
Fuzzy-QFD approach based decision support model for licensor selectionExpert Syst. Appl., 39
F. Felice, A. Petrillo (2011)
A MULTIPLE CHOICE DECISION ANALYSIS: AN INTEGRATED QFD-AHP MODEL FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF CUSTOMER NEEDSInternational journal of engineering science and technology, 2
L. Stehn, Max Bergström (2002)
Integrated design and production of multi-storey timber frame houses – production effects caused by customer-oriented designInternational Journal of Production Economics, 77
Harold Schaal, William Slabey (1990)
Implementing QFD at the Ford Motor Company
Yanlai Li, Jiafu Tang, K. Chin, Yi Han, Xinggang Luo (2012)
A rough set approach for estimating correlation measures in quality function deploymentInf. Sci., 189
Cpm Govers (1996)
What and how about quality function deployment (QFD)International Journal of Production Economics
T. Crowe, Chao-chun Cheng (1996)
Using quality function deployment in manufacturing strategic planningInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16
Kwang-Jae Kim, Deok‐Hwan Kim, Dae-Kee Min (2007)
Robust QFD: framework and a case studyQuality and Reliability Engineering International, 23
F. Leone, L. Nelson, R. Nottingham (1961)
The Folded Normal DistributionTechnometrics, 3
Michael Garver (2012)
Improving the house of quality with maximum difference scalingInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29
Xiaoxiang Shen, K. Tan, M. Xie (2000)
An integrated approach to innovative product development using Kano’s model and QFDEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 3
Y. Zhang (1999)
Green QFD-II: A life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matricesInternational Journal of Production Research, 37
C. Temponi, J. Yen, W. Tiao (1999)
House of quality: A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysisEur. J. Oper. Res., 117
D. Verma, J. Knezevic (1996)
A fuzzy weighted wedge mechanism for feasibility assessment of system reliability during conceptual designFuzzy Sets Syst., 83
G. Wasserman (1993)
ON HOW TO PRIORITIZE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DURING THE QFD PLANNING PROCESSIie Transactions, 25
F. Pakdil, F. Isin, H. Genc (2012)
A quality function deployment application using qualitative and quantitative analysis in after sales servicesTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23
N. Gunasekaran, S. Rathesh, S. Arunachalam, S. Koh (2006)
Optimizing supply chain management using fuzzy approachJournal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17
J. Hauser, D. Clausing, D. Garvin (1988)
The House of QualityHarvard Business Review
Yuanhsu Lin, Hui-Ping Cheng, M. Tseng, Jim Tsai (2010)
Using QFD and ANP to analyze the environmental production requirements in linguistic preferencesExpert Syst. Appl., 37
S. Sahney, D. Banwet, S. Karunes (2004)
A SERVQUAL and QFD approach to total quality educationInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53
Zafar Iqbal, N. Grigg, K. Govinderaju, N. Campbell-Allen (2014)
Statistical comparison of final weight scores in quality function deployment (QFD) studiesInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31
Chun-Lang Chang (2006)
Application of quality function deployment launches to enhancing nursing home service qualityTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17
S. Han, Shaw Chen, M. Ebrahimpour, M. Sodhi (2001)
A conceptual QFD planning modelInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18
Ming Zhou (1998)
Fuzzy logic and optimization models for implementing QFD, 35
Miyoung Jeong, Haemoon Oh (1998)
Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industryInternational Journal of Hospitality Management, 17
V. Bouchereau, Hefin Rowlands (2000)
Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment (QFD)Benchmarking: An International Journal, 7
L. Khoo, N. Ho (1996)
Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment systemInternational Journal of Production Research, 34
I. Dikmen, M. Birgonul, Semiha Kiziltas (2005)
Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industryBuilding and Environment, 40
F. Franceschini, S. Rossetto (2002)
QFD: an interactive algorithm for the prioritization of product’s technical design characteristicsIntegrated Manufacturing Systems, 13
Kurt Matzler, H. Hinterhuber (1998)
How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deploymentTechnovation, 18
Y. An, Sungjoon Lee, Yongtae Park (2008)
Development of an integrated product‐service roadmap with QFDInternational Journal of Service Industry Management, 19
A. Griffin, J. Hauser (1993)
The Voice of the CustomerMarketing Science, 12
Purpose – Quality function deployment (QFD) is a planning methodology to improve products, services and their associated processes by ensuring that the voice of the customer has been effectively deployed through specified and prioritised technical attributes (TAs). The purpose of this paper is two ways: to enhance the prioritisation of TAs: computer simulation significance test; and computer simulation confidence interval. Both are based on permutation sampling, bootstrap sampling and parametric bootstrap sampling of given empirical data. Design/methodology/approach – The authors present a theoretical case for the use permutation sampling, bootstrap sampling and parametric bootstrap sampling. Using a published case study the authors demonstrate how these can be applied on given empirical data to generate a theoretical population. From this the authors describe a procedure to decide upon which TAs have significantly different priority, and also estimate confidence intervals from the theoretical simulated populations. Findings – First, the authors demonstrate not only parametric bootstrap is useful to simulate theoretical populations. The authors can also employ permutation sampling and bootstrap sampling to generate theoretical populations. Then the authors obtain the results from these three approaches. qThe authors describe why there is a difference in results of permutation sampling, bootstrap and parametric bootstrap sampling. Practitioners can employ any approach, it depends how much variation in FWs is required by quality assurance division. Originality/value – Using these methods provides QFD practitioners with a robust and reliable method for determining which TAs should be selected for attention in product and service design. The explicit selection of TAs will help to achieve maximum customer satisfaction, and save time and money, which are the ultimate objectives of QFD.
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.