Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Analyses the role of accounting data in collective bargaining in not‐for‐profit organizations in four Canadian cases. Develops a model upon the constructs of “employer equivocality” and “union heterogeneity” to provide useful insights. Where employer equivocality is low and union heterogeneity is high, the analysis reveals that accounting data are not sought for their intrinsic information value, but rather for their facilitative role in providing a conduit, or an excuse, for continuing dialogue between the bargaining parties. Analysis of other intersecting levels of employer equivocality and union heterogeneity in bargaining settings characterized by collective bargainers′ shared values are instructive regarding the role of, and the extent of recourse to, accounting data.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 1992
Keywords: Accounting; Canada; Collective bargaining; Employees; Models; Trade unions
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.