Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Dorfman, W. Stephan, J. Loveland (1986)
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEHAVIORS: SUPERVISOR PERCEPTIONS AND SUBORDINATE REACTIONSPersonnel Psychology, 39
K. Wexley, R. Klimosky
Performance appraisal: an update
Wayne Nemeroff, K. Wexley (1979)
An exploration of the relationships between performance feedback interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by managers and subordinatesJournal of occupational psychology, 52
Douglas Cederblom (1982)
The Performance Appraisal Interview: A Review, Implications, and SuggestionsJournal of Library Administration, 4
F. Dansereau, G. Graen, William Haga (1975)
A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making processOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13
J.R. Hackman, G. Oldham
Development of the Job Description Index
H. Klein, S. Snell, K. Wexley (1987)
Systems Model of the Performance Appraisal Interview ProcessIndustrial Relations, 26
F.G. Dansereau, G. Graen, W. Hage
A dyad linkage approach to leadership within organizations
J. Ivancevich (1982)
Subordinates' reactions to performance appraisal interviews: A test of feedback and goal-setting techniques.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67
T. Stone, L. Cummings, D. Schwab (1973)
Performance in Organizations: Determinants and Appraisal.Administrative Science Quarterly, 18
J. Goodson, G. McGee (1991)
Enhancing individual perceptions of objectivity in performance appraisalJournal of Business Research, 22
J. Cohen, P. Cohen
Multiple Regression for the Behavioral Sciences
M. Beer (1981)
Performance appraisal: dilemmas and possibilities.Organizational dynamics, 9 3
J. Hackman, G. Oldham (1975)
Development of the Job Diagnostic SurveyJournal of Applied Psychology, 60
M. Greller (1975)
Subordinate participation and reactions to the appraisal interview.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60
W. Nemiroff, K. Wexley
The relationship between performance interview feedback characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by managers and subordinates
J.M. Ivancevich
Subordinate reactions to performance appraisal interviews
Using a contingency model of the effectiveness of performance appraisal interviews as a framework, examines the extent to which employee job performance and employee relations with their superior moderate the impact of goal setting in the interviews on the important outcomes: employees′ reactions to the interview and their degree of work motivation among 135 non‐managerial employees in a medium‐sized manufacturing company. Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that the impact of goal setting was stronger among poor performers than among good performers, and among employees who had good relations with their superiors than among those whose relations were relatively poor. Advances reasons for these and suggests implications for improving appraisals.
International Journal of Career Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 1995
Keywords: Employee relations; Goals; Line management; Management attitudes; Motivation; Performance appraisal
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.