Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Perreault, R. Miles (1978)
Influence strategy mixes in complex organizationsSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 23
R. Lewicki, Stephen Weiss, D. Lewin (1992)
Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13
D. Tjosvold, M. Okun (1979)
Effects of Unequal Power on Cooperation in ConflictPsychological Reports, 44
Linda Putnam (1988)
Communication and Interpersonal Conflict in OrganizationsManagement Communication Quarterly, 1
K. Thomas (1992)
Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and updateJournal of Organizational Behavior, 13
S. Musser (1982)
A model for predicting the choice of conflict management strategies by subordinates in high-stakes conflictsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29
Vernon Miller, Fredric Jablin (1991)
INFORMATION SEEKING DURING ORGANIZATIONAL ENTRY: INFLUENCES, TACTICS, AND A MODEL OF THE PROCESSAcademy of Management Review, 16
A. Zanzi, M. Arthur, B. Shamir (1991)
The relationships between career concerns and political tactics in organizationsJournal of Organizational Behavior, 12
K. Thomas (1988)
The Conflict-Handling ModesManagement Communication Quarterly, 1
D. Kipnis, S. Schmidt, I. Wilkinson (1980)
Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's WayJournal of Applied Psychology, 65
M. Knapp, Linda Putnam, Lillian Davis (1988)
Measuring Interpersonal Conflict in Organizations:Management Communication Quarterly, 1
M. Rahim, N. Magner (1995)
Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: first-order factor model and its invariance across groups.The Journal of applied psychology, 80 1
G. Yukl, Cecilia Falbe (1990)
Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
The study examined the effects of two context variables, such as work experience and opponent's power on the styles of handling interpersonal conflict. 480 subjects were asked to consider a short critical incident describing an interpersonal conflict in an organization and to indicate their response to the situation in terms of the five conflict management styles integrating, obliging, avoiding, dominating, and compromising. The results suggest that under the lowpower opponent condition there was a higher preference for dominating and a lower preference for avoiding, obliging, and integrating. Inexperienced subjects did not change their choice of using the different conflict management styles in view of their opponent's power. The results also showed significant interaction effects of the two independent variables. The implications for the study are discussed.
International Journal of Conflict Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.