Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

EFFECTS OF WORK EXPERIENCE AND OPPONENT'S POWER ON CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES

EFFECTS OF WORK EXPERIENCE AND OPPONENT'S POWER ON CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES The study examined the effects of two context variables, such as work experience and opponent's power on the styles of handling interpersonal conflict. 480 subjects were asked to consider a short critical incident describing an interpersonal conflict in an organization and to indicate their response to the situation in terms of the five conflict management styles integrating, obliging, avoiding, dominating, and compromising. The results suggest that under the lowpower opponent condition there was a higher preference for dominating and a lower preference for avoiding, obliging, and integrating. Inexperienced subjects did not change their choice of using the different conflict management styles in view of their opponent's power. The results also showed significant interaction effects of the two independent variables. The implications for the study are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Conflict Management Emerald Publishing

EFFECTS OF WORK EXPERIENCE AND OPPONENT'S POWER ON CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/effects-of-work-experience-and-opponent-s-power-on-conflict-management-bIsBEl0oG0

References (18)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1044-4068
DOI
10.1108/eb022794
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The study examined the effects of two context variables, such as work experience and opponent's power on the styles of handling interpersonal conflict. 480 subjects were asked to consider a short critical incident describing an interpersonal conflict in an organization and to indicate their response to the situation in terms of the five conflict management styles integrating, obliging, avoiding, dominating, and compromising. The results suggest that under the lowpower opponent condition there was a higher preference for dominating and a lower preference for avoiding, obliging, and integrating. Inexperienced subjects did not change their choice of using the different conflict management styles in view of their opponent's power. The results also showed significant interaction effects of the two independent variables. The implications for the study are discussed.

Journal

International Journal of Conflict ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Feb 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.