Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Effects of unbalanced incentive measures on buyer performance – an empirical study in Taiwan

Effects of unbalanced incentive measures on buyer performance – an empirical study in Taiwan Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the performance effects of an incentive plan that links buyers' compensation to financial measures, namely sales and gross margin, in the retail industry. It seeks to examine the issue using field data obtained from the 3C (computers, communications, and consumer electronics) company, the largest electronics chain store business in Taiwan. Design/methodology/approach – In addition to t ‐tests, the authors use a multiple regression model to examine the impact of the buyer incentive plan on purchasing performance. Findings – It was found that the gross margin return on inventory investment (GMROI), the most critical purchasing performance measure in retailing, deteriorated after implementing the incentive plan. Further analysis showed that although sales and gross margins increased as a result of the plan, the benefits were completely offset by a significant decrease in inventory turnover. Research limitations/implications – This study has two limitations. First, the case study involved a specific retail chain. Thus, the extent that the results can be generalized to other organizations or other industries has yet to be explored. Second, to obtain a more comprehensive dataset and more observations, procurement team data was used instead of individual buyer data to measure the purchasing performance. Practical implications – Managers should be aware of possible negative impacts when they design incentive plans, e.g. dysfunctional behavior among employees. Originality/value – An incentive plan should incorporate all critical components related to buyer performance if there is to be improvement in terms of the key performance measures. The paper contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence about the appropriateness of the performance measures used in buyer incentive plans designed for the retail industry. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management Emerald Publishing

Effects of unbalanced incentive measures on buyer performance – an empirical study in Taiwan

Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/effects-of-unbalanced-incentive-measures-on-buyer-performance-an-HHQ0pDwQ0k
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1741-0401
DOI
10.1108/17410401111182224
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the performance effects of an incentive plan that links buyers' compensation to financial measures, namely sales and gross margin, in the retail industry. It seeks to examine the issue using field data obtained from the 3C (computers, communications, and consumer electronics) company, the largest electronics chain store business in Taiwan. Design/methodology/approach – In addition to t ‐tests, the authors use a multiple regression model to examine the impact of the buyer incentive plan on purchasing performance. Findings – It was found that the gross margin return on inventory investment (GMROI), the most critical purchasing performance measure in retailing, deteriorated after implementing the incentive plan. Further analysis showed that although sales and gross margins increased as a result of the plan, the benefits were completely offset by a significant decrease in inventory turnover. Research limitations/implications – This study has two limitations. First, the case study involved a specific retail chain. Thus, the extent that the results can be generalized to other organizations or other industries has yet to be explored. Second, to obtain a more comprehensive dataset and more observations, procurement team data was used instead of individual buyer data to measure the purchasing performance. Practical implications – Managers should be aware of possible negative impacts when they design incentive plans, e.g. dysfunctional behavior among employees. Originality/value – An incentive plan should incorporate all critical components related to buyer performance if there is to be improvement in terms of the key performance measures. The paper contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence about the appropriateness of the performance measures used in buyer incentive plans designed for the retail industry.

Journal

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 1, 2011

Keywords: Performance; Performance measures; Profit; Taiwan; Electronics industry; Organizational buying behaviour

References

  • Managing without Supervising
    Abernathy, W.B.
  • A behavior‐based employee performance system
    Abernathy, W.B.
  • Managing inventories and profits through GMROI
    Ahern, J.T.; Romano, J.R.; Patricl, L.
  • Compensation and incentives: practice versus theory
    Baker, G.P.; Jensen, M.C.; Murphy, K.J.
  • A field study of the impact of a performance‐based incentive plan
    Banker, R.D.; Lee, S.Y.; Potter, G.
  • An empirical analysis of continuing improvements following the implementation of a performance based compensation plan
    Banker, R.D.; Lee, S.Y.; Potter, G.; Srinivasan, D.
  • The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research
    Bonner, S.; Sprinkle, G.
  • Performance measure properties and the effect of incentive contracts
    Bouwens, J.; Van Lent, L.
  • Perspectives on profit
    Broeren, M.A.
  • The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: push, pull, and advance‐purchase discount contracts
    Cachon, G.P.
  • Purchasing performance evaluation: an investigation of different perspectives
    Chao, C.N.; Scheuing, E.E.; Ruch, W.A.
  • Purchasing performance evaluation: with data envelopment analysis
    Easton, L.; Murphy, D.J.; Pearson, J.N.
  • Effects of choice of pay plans on satisfaction, goal setting, and performance
    Farh, J.L.; Griffeth, R.W.; Balkin, D.B.
  • Productivity measurement by objectives
    Felix, G.H.; Riggs, J.L.
  • Testing a portion of Sheth's theory of merchandise buying behaviour with small apparel firms
    Fiorito, S.S.
  • Work productivity as a function of the percentage of monetary incentives to base pay
    Frischa, C.J.; Dickinson, A.M.
  • Engineering compensation systems: effects of commissioned versus wage payment engineering compensation systems: effects of commissioned versus wage payment
    Gaetani, J.J.; Hoxeng, D.D.; Austin, J.T.
  • Determinants and effects of subjectivity in incentives
    Gibbs, M.; Merchant, K.A.; Van der Stede, W.A.; Vargus, M.E.
  • Econometric Analysis
    Greene, W.H.
  • Undergraduate Econometrics
    Hill, R.C.; Griffiths, W.E.; Judge, G.G.
  • Multitask principal‐agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design
    Holmstrom, B.; Milgrom, P.
  • Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction
    Ittner, C.D.; Larcker, D.F.
  • Performance pay and top‐management incentives
    Jensen, M.C.; Murphy, K.J.