Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Bassuoni, M. Nehdi (2009)
Durability of self-consolidating concrete to different exposure regimes of sodium sulfate attackMaterials and Structures, 42
M. Sümer (2012)
Compressive strength and sulfate resistance properties of concretes containing Class F and Class C fly ashesConstruction and Building Materials, 34
H. Dehwah (2007)
Effect of sulfate concentration and associated cation type on concrete deterioration and morphological changes in cement hydratesConstruction and Building Materials, 21
P. Chindaprasirt, C. Jaturapitakkul, Theerawat Sinsiri (2005)
Effect of fly ash fineness on compressive strength and pore size of blended cement pasteCement & Concrete Composites, 27
Z. Yao, X. Ji, P. Sarker, J. Tang, L. Ge, M. Xia, Y. Xi (2015)
A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ashEarth-Science Reviews, 141
N. Ghafoori, M. Najimi, H. Diawara, M. Islam (2015)
Effects of class F fly ash on sulfate resistance of Type V Portland cement concretes under continuous and interrupted sulfate exposuresConstruction and Building Materials, 78
Nuntachai Chusilp, C. Jaturapitakkul, K. Kiattikomol (2009)
Effects of LOI of ground bagasse ash on the compressive strength and sulfate resistance of mortarsConstruction and Building Materials, 23
E. Rozière, A. Loukili, R. Hachem, F. Grondin (2009)
Durability of concrete exposed to leaching and external sulphate attacksCement and Concrete Research, 39
S. Al-Dulaijan (2007)
Sulfate resistance of plain and blended cements exposed to magnesium sulfate solutionsConstruction and Building Materials, 21
M. Kayhanian, A. Vichare, P. Green, J. Harvey (2009)
Leachability of dissolved chromium in asphalt and concrete surfacing materials.Journal of environmental management, 90 11
W. Chalee, C. Jaturapitakkul, P. Chindaprasirt (2009)
Predicting the chloride penetration of fly ash concrete in seawaterMarine Structures, 22
K. Yıldırım, M. Sümer (2013)
Effects of sodium chloride and magnesium sulfate concentration on the durability of cement mortar with and without fly ashComposites Part B-engineering, 52
C. Ferraris, P. Stutzman, K. Snyder (2006)
Sulfate Resistance of Concrete: A New Approach
M. Şahmaran, T. Erdem, I. Yaman (2007)
Sulfate resistance of plain and blended cements exposed to wetting–drying and heating–cooling environmentsConstruction and Building Materials, 21
Nuntachai Chusilp, Napongsatorn Likhitsripaiboon, C. Jaturapitakkul (2009)
Development of bagasse ash as a pozzolanic material in concrete
H. Siad, M. Lachemi, S. Bernard, M. Şahmaran, A. Hossain (2015)
Assessment of the long-term performance of SCC incorporating different mineral admixtures in a magnesium sulphate environmentConstruction and Building Materials, 80
Purpose– The cementitious/chemical properties of the untreated CFA are dependent on the coal composition and previous burning conditions. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether untreated CFA can efficiently reduce cement replacement and does not require further combustion treatment to be a viable cement replacement. Design/methodology/approach– Two types of mixes: Type I concrete and PCFA (Type I and 30 per cent untreated CFA) concrete were batched and subjected to compressive strength tests and cyclic exposures of 5 per cent sodium sulphate (Na2SO4) and 5 per cent magnesium sulphate (MgSO4), respectively. Findings– PCFA mix was 41.1 and 35.21 per cent lower in strength compared to Type I at 28 and 56 days correspondingly. Continuous-sulphate-exposure resulted in slow but continued strength development for both mixes. However, the strengths of PCFA cubes exposed to cyclic sulphate and sulphate/magnesium salts continued to increase at a lower rate from their corresponding 28-day strength (rate of 18.7 per cent and strength 27.30 MPa in Na2SO4 and rate of 10.0 per cent and strength 25.30 MPa in MgSO4) while Type I specimens subjected to the same exposure conditions experienced drastic reductions in strength (rate of −15.0 per cent and strength 33.21 MPa in Na2SO4 and rate of −23.4 per cent and strength 29.94 MPa in MgSO4). Research limitations/implications– Results justify the need for additional tests essentially: at different percentage replacement of untreated CFA, fineness of materials, chloride environment and longer exposures, to address the cementitious properties of untreated CFA as cement replacement. Originality/value– Treatment methods for fly ashes require undoubtedly additional resources, energy input and cost. This paper paves the way to define whether untreated CFA can be used as cement replacement in concrete.
Structural Survey – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 9, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.