Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Schutz, F. Pilgrim (1958)
A Field Study of Food MonotonyPsychological Reports, 4
A. Stunkard, S. Messick (1985)
The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.Journal of psychosomatic research, 29 1
E. Rolls, J. Rolls (1997)
Olfactory Sensory-Specific Satiety in HumansPhysiology & Behavior, 61
B. Rolls, M. Hetherington, V. Burley (1988)
The specificity of satiety: The influence of foods of different macronutrient content on the development of satietyPhysiology & Behavior, 43
B. Rolls, P. Duijvenvoorde, E. Rolls (1984)
Pleasantness changes and food intake in a varied four-course mealAppetite, 5
M. Glanzer (1953)
Stimulus satiation: an explanation of spontaneous alternation and related phenomena.Psychological review, 60 4
T. Strien, J. Frijters, G. Bergers, P. Defares (1986)
The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behaviorInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science
David Garner, P. Garfinkel (1979)
The Eating Attitudes Test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosaPsychological Medicine, 9
P. Siegel, F. Pilgrim (1958)
The effect of monotony on the acceptance of food.The American journal of psychology, 71 4
E.T. Rolls, W.L de Waal
Long term sensory‐specific satiety: evidence from an Ethiopiean refugee camp
B. Rolls, M. Hetherington, V. Burley (1988)
Sensory stimulation and energy density in the development of satietyPhysiology & Behavior, 44
H. Moskowitz (1980)
PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF FOOD PREFERENCESFoodservice Research International, 1
M. Hetherington, J. Macdiarmid (1995)
Pleasure and excess: Liking for and overconsumption of chocolatePhysiology & Behavior, 57
B.J Rolls, P.M van Duijvenvoorde, E.T Rolls
Pleasantness changes and food intake across a varied four course meal
M. Hetherington, B. Rolls (1996)
Sensory-specific satiety: Theoretical frameworks and central characteristics.
M. Hetherington, B. Rolls, V. Burley (1989)
The time course of sensory-specific satietyAppetite, 12
L. Birch, D. Marlin (1982)
I don't like it; I never tried it: Effects of exposure on two-year-old children's food preferencesAppetite, 3
H.G Schutz, F.J Pilgrim
A field study of monotony
K. Stubenitsky, J. Aaron, S. Catt, D. Mela (1999)
Effect of information and extended use on the acceptance of reduced-fat productsFood Quality and Preference, 10
J. Le Magnen
Advances in studies in the physiological control and regulation of food intake
A. Beck, C. Ward, M. Mendelson, J. Mock, J. Erbaugh (1961)
An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of general psychiatry, 4
M.M Hetherington, B.J. Rolls
Sensory‐specific satiety: theoretical frameworks and principle characteristics
P. Pliner (1982)
The Effects of Mere Exposure on Liking for Edible SubstancesAppetite, 3
B. Rolls, E. Rolls, E. Rowe, K. Sweeney (1981)
Sensory specific satiety in manPhysiology & Behavior, 27
The pleasantness of a food declines with consumption and this phenomenon has been demonstrated reliably in the short-term. To investigate long-term effects of repeat consumption on pleasantness, preference and intake, 21 volunteers consumed either a salty snack (french fries) or sweet snack (chocolate) every day for 15 days. Four dependent variables were measured: pleasantness ratings, ranked preference, frequency of consumption and ad libitum intake. Daily pleasantness of taste ratings decreased across the exposure period only for chocolate. Ranked preference for chocolate declined during the sweet snack condition and increased during the salty snack condition. Preference for french fries remained the same during the salty snack condition and increased during the sweet snack condition. Frequency of consuming chocolate outside the laboratory decreased during the sweet snack exposure. No such pattern was found for french fries in either condition. Ad libitum intake in the laboratory remained the same over time for both foods. Short-term sensory-specific satiety within the eating episode was consistent over time. Therefore, long-term monotony effects were found only for pleasantness, preference and frequency of eating chocolate following repeated exposure, but these changes had no impact on ad libitum intake. Systematic, repeat exposure to a single food provides a useful paradigm for investigating the development of monotony.
British Food Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 1, 2000
Keywords: Taste; Food
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.