Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ali Shiri, Keri Molberg (2005)
Interfaces to knowledge organization systems in Canadian digital library collectionsOnline Inf. Rev., 29
N. Belkin, P. Marchetti, Colleen Cool (1993)
Braque: Design of an Interface to Support User Interaction in Information RetrievalInf. Process. Manag., 29
R. Rao, Jan Pedersen, Marti Hearst, J. Mackinlay, S. Card, L. Masinter, Per-Kristian Halvorsen, G. Robertson (1995)
Rich interaction in the digital libraryCommun. ACM, 38
Marti Hearst, Ame Elliott, Jennifer English, R. Sinha, Kirsten Swearingen, K. Yee (2002)
Finding the flow in web site searchCommun. ACM, 45
Sherry Chen, G. Magoulas, D. Dimakopoulos (2005)
A flexible interface design for Web directories to accommodate different cognitive stylesJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 56
L. Hill, Larry Carver, M. Larsgaard, R. Dolin, Terence Smith, J. Frew, Mary-Anna Rae (2000)
Alexandria digital library: user evaluation studies and system designJ. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 51
H. Hartson, P. Shivakumar, Manuel Pérez-Quiñones (2004)
Usability inspection of digital libraries: a case studyInternational Journal on Digital Libraries, 4
Rekha Kengeri, Cheryl Seals, Hope Harley, Himabindu Reddy, E. Fox (1999)
Usability study of digital libraries: ACM, IEEE-CS, NCSTRL, NDLTDInternational Journal on Digital Libraries, 2
(1999)
Modern Information Retrieval
Richard Chimera, B. Shneiderman (1994)
An exploratory evaluation of three interfaces for browsing large hierarchical tables of contentsACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 12
M. Hertzum, E. Frøkjær (1996)
Browsing and querying in online documentation: a study of user interfaces and the interaction processACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact., 3
D. Egan, J. Remde, T. Landauer, C. Lochbaum, L. Gomez (1989)
Behavioral evaluation and analysis of a hypertext browser
Shan-Ju Chang, R. Rice (1993)
Browsing: a multidimensional framework, 28
G. Marchionini, G. Crane (1994)
Evaluating hypermedia and learning: methods and results from the Perseus ProjectACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 12
Wisam Dakka, Panagiotis Ipeirotis, Kenneth Wood (2005)
Automatic construction of multifaceted browsing interfaces
G. Paynter, I. Witten, S. Cunningham, G. Buchanan (2000)
Scalable browsing for large collections: a case study
R. Bodner, M. Chignell, Nipon Charoenkitkarn, G. Golovchinsky, R. Kopak (2001)
The impact of text browsing on text retrieval performanceInf. Process. Manag., 37
M. Bates (2002)
The cascade of interactions in the digital library interfaceInf. Process. Manag., 38
G. Marchionini (1995)
Information Seeking in Electronic Environments
B. Shneiderman, Donald Byrd, W. Croft (1997)
Clarifying Search: A User-Interface Framework for Text SearchesD Lib Mag., 3
(2004)
User interfaces and visualization
M. Lesk (2004)
Understanding Digital Libraries
J. Thong, Weiyin Hong, K. Tam (2002)
Understanding User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: What are the Roles of Interface Characteristics, Organizational Context, and Individual Differences?ERN: Behavioral Economics (Topic)
Dana Mckay, Preeti Shukla, R. Hunt, S. Cunningham (2004)
Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: three new approaches to browsing in GreenstoneInternational Journal on Digital Libraries, 4
M. Resnick, Misha Vaughan (2006)
Best practices and future visions for search user interfacesJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 57
N. Belkin, Colleen Cool, J. Jeng, Amymarie Keller, D. Kelly, Ja-Young Kim, Hyuk-Jin Lee, Muh-Chyun Tang, Xiaojun Yuan (2001)
Rutgers' TREC 2001 Interactive Track Experience
Weiyin Hong, J. Thong, Wai-Man Wong, K. Tam (2002)
Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System CharacteristicsJournal of Management Information Systems, 18
Purpose – This study aims to investigate the effects of different search and browse features in digital libraries (DLs) on task interactions, and what features would lead to poor user experience. Design/methodology/approach – Three operational DLs: ACM, IEEE CS, and IEEE Xplore are used in this study. These three DLs present different features in their search and browsing designs. Two information‐seeking tasks are constructed: one search task and one browsing task. An experiment was conducted in a usability laboratory. Data from 35 participants are collected on a set of measures for user interactions. Findings – The results demonstrate significant differences in many aspects of the user interactions between the three DLs. For both search and browse designs, the features that lead to poor user interactions are identified. Research limitations/implications – User interactions are affected by specific design features in DLs. Some of the design features may lead to poor user performance and should be improved. The study was limited mainly in the variety and the number of tasks used. Originality/value – The study provided empirical evidence to the effects of interaction design features in DLs on user interactions and performance. The results contribute to our knowledge about DL designs in general and about the three operational DLs in particular.
Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 25, 2008
Keywords: Information retrieval; Digital libraries; Design; User studies
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.