Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Over the last five to ten years an increasing number of publicagencies have commenced strategic planning. However, results have oftenfallen short of what strategic planning is supposed to achieve. Drawingon experience of strategic planning systems in public bodies in a numberof countries, offers the view that it is the motivation of thepowerholders in the system which determines the approach taken tostrategic planning and, consequently, the type of outcomes whicheventuate. The three most common approaches to strategic planning are toengage in it as an annual ritual, to see it as a technical goalsettingand decisionmaking process, or to approach it in a consensusseekingmanner. Each of these approaches has potential negative outcomes.Identifies a fourth and much less common approach, namely, regardingstrategic planning as an organizational learning process. Explores thebenefits and impediments to this approach and offers some generalguidelines for effective strategic planning.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.