Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Foley (2005)
The Real Benefits, Beneficiaries and Value of E-GovernmentPublic Money & Management, 25
A. Brannen
E‐government in california: providing services to citizens through the internet
S. Vogt
Government: online but not in line
OECD
The case for e‐government: excerpts from the OECD report – the e‐government initiative
E. Deakins, Stuart Dillon (2002)
E‐government in New Zealand: the local authority perspectiveInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 15
Unpan (2002)
Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective
B. Gunter (2006)
Advances in e-democracy: overviewAslib Proc., 58
D.J. Jorgensen, S. Cable
Facing the challenges of e‐government: a case study of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas
Michael Deis, J. Scott (2002)
An Evaluation of Retraining Programs for Dislocated Workers in the Airline IndustrySAM Advanced Management Journal, 67
Local Government Association
egov@local: towards a national strategy for local e‐government
D. West (2004)
E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen AttitudesPublic Administration Review, 64
S. Bretschneider (2003)
Information Technology, E-Government, and Institutional ChangePublic Administration Review, 63
M. Moon (2002)
The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?Public Administration Review, 62
B. Gunter
Advances in e‐democracy
Zakareya Ebrahim, Z. Irani (2005)
E-government adoption: architecture and barriersBus. Process. Manag. J., 11
Purpose – The aim of this investigation is to examine the level of adoption of e‐government at the regional level in Europe in terms of eight different categories addressing both services provided, internal capacity in terms of training and policies, and perceived barriers to e‐government. Design/methodology/approach – A survey approach was employed to achieve the overall aim of the study, based on existing survey instruments and informed by the requirements of policy makers. A survey of 1,021 municipalities across seven European regions was conducted in order to ascertain the development of e‐government. Findings – The findings suggest that despite e‐government being heavily promoted throughout the Europe, there is relatively little commonality across regions evident to date. The study identifies a number of areas for improvement within the eight categories investigated. Research limitations/implications – The desired minimum confidence level and confidence interval was not realised across all regions. It would be appropriate to conduct further investigations which include larger (non‐UK) administrative bodies in order that progress made by comparable organizations may be evaluated. Although the study includes results from municipalities in seven regions, it would be desirable to expand the scope of the investigation. Originality/value – The primary value of this paper lies in the size of the sample derived at regional rather than national level, the resulting data extending our understanding of the adoption of information and communication technologies within municipalities at regional level in Europe.
Transforming Government People Process and Policy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 21, 2008
Keywords: Communication technologies; Government; Europe
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.