Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Verdouw, A. Beulens, D. Bouwmeester, J. Trienekens (2006)
Modelling Demand-driven Chain Networks using Multiple CODPs
M. Christopher (2011)
Logistics and supply chain management
J. Wikner, Martin Rudberg (2005)
Integrating production and engineering perspectives on the customer order decoupling pointInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25
W. Hopp, M. Spearman
Factory Physics
M. Hallgren, J. Olhager (2006)
Differentiating manufacturing focusInternational Journal of Production Research, 44
J.W. Forrester
Industrial Dynamics
A. Harrison (2002)
Logistics Management and Strategy
Taho Yang, Yuan-Feng Wen, F. Wang (2011)
Evaluation of robustness of supply chain information-sharing strategies using a hybrid Taguchi and multiple criteria decision-making methodInternational Journal of Production Economics, 134
Xinyu Sun, P. Ji, Linyan Sun, Y. Wang (2008)
Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply networkInternational Journal of Production Economics, 113
S. Disney, D. Towill (2003)
On the bullwhip and inventory variance produced by an ordering policyManagement Science
(2004)
Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management
Rachel Mason-Jones, D. Towill (1999)
Using the Information Decoupling Point to Improve Supply Chain PerformanceThe International Journal of Logistics Management, 10
D. Maister (1976)
Centralisation of Inventories and the “Square Root Law”, 6
J. Wikner, Martin Rudberg (2005)
Introducing a customer order decoupling zone in logistics decision-makingInternational Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 8
V. Donk (2001)
Make to stock or make to order: the decoupling point in the food processing industriesInternational Journal of Production Economics, 69
J. Olhager (2010)
The role of the customer order decoupling point in production and supply chain managementComput. Ind., 61
Paul Giesberts, LAURENS Tang (1992)
Dynamics of the customer order decoupling point: impact on information systems for production controlProduction Planning & Control, 3
Rachel Mason-Jones, B. Naylor, D. Towill (2000)
Engineering the leagile supply chainInternational Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2
G. Sharman
The rediscovery of logistics
A. D'Alessandro, A. Baveja (2000)
Divide and Conquer: Rohm and Haas' Response to a Changing Specialty Chemicals MarketInterfaces, 30
J. Wikner, D. Towill, M. Naim (1991)
Smoothing Supply Chain DynamicsInternational Journal of Production Economics, 22
Li Zhou, S. Disney, D. Towill (2010)
A pragmatic approach to the design of bullwhip controllersInternational Journal of Production Economics, 128
Werner Jammernegg, G. Reiner (2007)
Performance improvement of supply chain processes by coordinated inventory and capacity managementInternational Journal of Production Economics, 108
J. Wikner, M. Naim, Martin Rudberg (2007)
Exploiting the Order Book for Mass Customized Manufacturing Control Systems With Capacity LimitationsIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54
J. Olhager (2003)
Strategic positioning of the order penetration pointInternational Journal of Production Economics, 85
Purpose – The positioning of the customer order decoupling point (CODP) is an important strategic consideration for supply chains. Recently, research has focused only on the static effects of CODP positioning. The purpose of this paper is to expand the body of knowledge by describing the dynamic consequences that arise from shifting the CODP upstream or downstream. Design/methodology/approach – A generic assembly‐to‐order system dynamics simulation model is developed and used to evaluate the dynamic consequences of shifting the CODP. Findings – Placing the CODP downstream allows for short‐term fluctuations in demand to be absorbed by the order book, leading to a stable production rate and inventory response. This benefit must, however, be weighed against any additional safety stock a CODP placed far downstream may require. Research limitations/implications – The paper demonstrates the importance of considering the dynamic aspects of CODP positioning. Further research should investigate the phenomenon for different demand scenarios and supply chain configurations. Practical implications – Downstream shifting of the CODP has been identified as a powerful way to reduce variability in assembly‐to‐order systems. Originality/value – This paper introduces the dynamic consequences of CODP location, providing a new perspective that should be considered when positioning the CODP.
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 25, 2011
Keywords: Supply chain management; Assembly; Order systems; System dynamics; Customer order decoupling point; Assembly to order
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.