Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Gabriel Hawawini, V. Subramanian, Paul Verdin (2004)
The home country in the age of globalization: how much does it matter for firm performance?Journal of World Business, 39
M. Lausten (2002)
CEO turnover, firm performance and corporate governance: empirical evidence on Danish firmsInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 20
M. Hitt, R. Hoskisson, Hicheon Kim (1997)
International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified FirmsAcademy of Management Journal, 40
Boston Consulting Group
The 2008 BCG 100 New Global Challengers: How Top Companies from Rapidly Developing Economies are Changing the World
O. Branzei, A. Nadkarni
The TATA way: evolving and executing sustainable business strategies
Livia Bonazzi, S. Islam (2007)
Agency theory and corporate governance: A study of the effectiveness of board in their monitoring of the CEOJournal of Modelling in Management, 2
Daniel Sullivan (1994)
Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a FirmJournal of International Business Studies, 25
Stephen Tallman, Jiatao Li (1996)
Effects of International Diversity and Product Diversity on the Performance of Multinational FirmsAcademy of Management Journal, 39
M. Nourayi, S. Mintz (2008)
Tenure, firm's performance, and CEO's compensationManagerial Finance, 34
J. Barney, D. Clark (2007)
Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage
B. Elango, S. Sethi (2007)
An exploration of the relationship between country of origin (COE) and the internationalization-performance paradigmManagement International Review, 47
M. Zhong, Hui Yang (2004)
Risk Exposures and International Diversification: Evidence from IsharesMutual Funds
M. Porter (1986)
Competition in Global Industries
B. Chakravarthy (1986)
Measuring strategic performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 7
R. Lancioni (1989)
The Importance of Price in International Business DevelopmentEuropean Journal of Marketing, 23
P. Krugman (1991)
Rethinking International Trade
M. Porter, C. Ketels, Mercedes Delgado (2003)
The Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index
S. Sledge (2006)
Does Globalization Affect Multinational Corporation Performance?Journal of Transnational Management, 11
R. Grant (1987)
Multinationality and Performance among British Manufacturing CompaniesJournal of International Business Studies, 18
J. Tarziján, Francisco Brahm, Luis Daiber (2008)
Entrepreneurial profitability and persistence: Chile versus the U.S.A.Journal of Business Research, 61
B. Kamrad, Akhtar Siddique (2004)
Supply Contracts, Profit Sharing, Switching, and Reaction OptionsManag. Sci., 50
M. Demirbag, K. Glaister, Ekrem Tatoğlu (2007)
Institutional and transaction cost influences on MNEs' ownership strategies of their affiliates: Evidence from an emerging marketJournal of World Business, 42
J. Squalli, Kenneth Wilson, Sarah Hugo (2008)
An analysis of growth competitivenessInternational Review of Applied Economics, 22
F. Warzynski (2003)
Managerial Change, Competition, and Privatization in UkraineJournal of Comparative Economics, 31
L. Gomes, K. Ramaswamy (1999)
An Empirical Examination of the Form of the Relationship Between Multinationality and PerformanceJournal of International Business Studies, 30
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of factors that impact global competitiveness for firms in the Fortune Global 500. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses regression analysis to investigate the relationship between relevant competitiveness factors and firm performance for Fortune Global 500 firms, using the time period 1995‐2009. Findings – The composition of firms on the list has changed over the timeframe. The results indicate that headquarters location and globalization are key indicators of firm performance. Other factors such as chief executive officer tenure have a lesser impact on firm performance. Research limitations/implications – The timeframe of the study may have impacted the findings. The study included only large firms and thus the findings may not hold for smaller or medium‐sized firms. Additional follow‐up studies are planned. Practical implications – Managers can identify factors associated with global competitiveness from the paper and pursue those factors in their business strategies. Originality/value – This study replicates other studies that analyze the relationship between firm situational factors and firm performance. However, this study uses a unique sample, the Fortune Global 500, over a 15‐year period.
Competitiveness Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 4, 2011
Keywords: Competitiveness; Multinational companies; Organizational performance; Fortune 500 companies; Global competitiveness
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.