Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
ISA 540
Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates and Related Disclosures
AICPA
Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards No. 1‐111
T. Hall, Bethane Pierce, K. Price, Christopher Skousen (2010)
Haphazard Selection: Is it Time to Change Audit Standards?
U. Menzefricke, Wally Smieliauskas (1984)
A Simulation Study Of The Performance Of Parametric Dollar Unit Sampling Statistical ProceduresJournal of Accounting Research, 22
ISA 200
Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with International Standards of Auditing
Wally Smieliauskas (1985)
Sensitivity Analysis of the Realized Risks of Auditing with Uncertainty Concerning Internal Control EvaluationsJournal of Accounting Research, 23
ISA 330
The Auditor's Responses to Assessed Risks
J. Collins, N. Mann, R. Schafer, N. Singpurwalla (1975)
Methods for Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70
ISA 530
Audit Sampling
U. Menzefricke, Wally Smieliauskas (1987)
A comparison of the stratified difference estimator with some monetary‐unit sampling estimators*Contemporary Accounting Research, 4
W.L. Jr Felix, W.R. Jr Kinney
Research on the auditor's opinion formulation process: state‐of‐the‐art
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to summarize a simulation study that analyzed the performance of Bayesian audit strategies in a novel fashion – dynamically and with varying sample sizes depending on the extent of an auditor's prior information. Design/methodology/approach – The prior information for the Bayesian strategies arises from a set of control tests that are evaluated making use of reliability theory. The entire audit strategy is simulated under systematically different control reliabilities and related amounts of total misstatements in an accounting population. Findings – The major finding is that robust Bayesian audit strategies that have recently been developed in auditing research are more sensitive to non‐sampling errors than existing strategies of audit practice. Practical implications – The authors find that there are differential effects of sampling error vs non‐sampling error on the Bayesian strategies and that controls testing does not need to be extensive to get full internal control reliance. Originality/value – The paper adds to existing research by examining the performance of various Bayesian audit strategies under more realistic audit conditions of sampling and non‐sampling uncertainty.
Grey Systems Theory and Application – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 20, 2011
Keywords: Internal control; Reliability; Modelling; Auditing; Audit strategy; Robust Bayesian
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.