Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Steinmetz, M. Helias, G. Wimmer, L. Fichte, M. Clemens (2006)
Electro-quasistatic field simulations based on a discrete electromagnetism formulationIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 42
H. Dirks (1996)
Quasi-stationary fields for microelectronic applicationsElectrical Engineering, 79
A. Buffa, H. Ammari, J. Nédélec (2000)
A Justification of Eddy Currents Model for the Maxwell EquationsSIAM J. Appl. Math., 60
H. Haus, J. Melcher (1989)
Electromagnetic Fields And Energy
R. Hiptmair, F. Krämer, J. Ostrowski (2008)
A Robust Maxwell Formulation for All FrequenciesIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 44
M. Montigny, G. Rousseaux (2005)
On the electrodynamics of moving bodies at low velocitiesEuropean Journal of Physics, 27
Kersten Schmidt, Oliver Sterz, Ralf Hiptmair (2008)
Estimating the Eddy-Current Modeling ErrorIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 44
Purpose – The paper aims at proposing a uniform and demonstrative description of two well‐known and widely used approximations of slowly time‐varying electromagnetic fields, i.e. the electro‐quasistatic and the magneto‐quasistationary approximation to Maxwell's equations. Design/methodology/approach – Under both approximations, the orders of magnitude of the relative errors of the dominant fields are analyzed by using three characteristic time constants. These time constants are determined by considering the material properties, the characteristic length scale and the characteristic time scale. Findings – Limiting curves which show the domains of applicability of the two approximations are retrieved from the estimation of their relative errors. The relation between the domains of validity of the electro‐quasistatic and magneto‐quasistationary approximations was found and depicted in a combined diagram. Research limitations/implications – The study is restricted to slowly time‐varying electromagnetic fields. Heuristic and local estimates based on local material properties were used for the analysis. Rigorous estimations of the errors (e.g. also considering the field problem's topology) of the magneto‐quasistationary approximation are already known in the literature. A rigorous estimation of the error of the electro‐quasistatic approximation is, therefore, suggested for future research. Originality/value – The combined diagram showing the domains of validity of both approximations considered here in a uniform way is novel. It gives rise to an intuitive and easily accessible understanding of their applicability.
COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 12, 2011
Keywords: Electromagnetic fields; High voltage; Electronic engineering
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.