Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2020a)
Best companies to work for
J. Joecks, Kerstin Pull, Karin Vetter (2013)
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”Journal of Business Ethics, 118
L. Martins (2005)
A Model of the Effects of Reputational Rankings on Organizational ChangeOrgan. Sci., 16
Erynne Landry, Richard Bernardi, Susan Bosco (2016)
Recognition for Sustained Corporate Social Responsibility: Female Directors Make a DifferenceCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23
Francisco Bravo, María Alcaide-Ruiz (2019)
The disclosure of financial forward-looking informationGender in Management: An International Journal
Kris Byron, Corinne Post (2016)
Women on Boards of Directors and Corporate Social Performance: A Meta‐AnalysisCGN: Equity & Diversity (Topic)
Richard Bernardi, Susan Bosco, Katie Vassill (2006)
Does Female Representation on Boards of Directors Associate With Fortune's “100 Best Companies to Work For” List?Business & Society, 45
Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 6
Miriam Schwartz-Ziv (2015)
Gender and Board Activeness: The Role of a Critical MassJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52
S. Thiruvadi, H. Huang (2011)
Audit committee gender differences and earnings managementGender in Management: An International Journal, 26
Nuria Reguera‐Alvarado, Francisco Bravo-Urquiza (2020)
The impact of board diversity and voluntary risk disclosure on financial outcomes. A case for the manufacturing industryGender in Management: An International Journal, 35
R.Murray Lindsay (1995)
Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy☆Accounting Organizations and Society, 20
Richard Bernardi, Susan Bosco, Veronica Columb (2009)
Does Female Representation on Boards of Directors Associate with the ‘Most Ethical Companies’ List?Corporate Reputation Review, 12
(2020)
World’s most ethical companies
(2009)
Proxy disclosure enhancements
M. Pucheta‐Martínez, Inmaculada Bel‐Oms, Gustau Olcina‐Sempere (2018)
Commitment of Independent and Institutional Women Directors to Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Finance: Governance
Amanda Packel (2016)
Book Review: Government Intervention into Board Composition: Gender Quotas in Norway and Diversity Disclosures in the United States, 21
Boris Groysberg, Deborah Bell (2013)
Dysfunction in the Boardroom - Understanding the persistent gender gap at the highest levels
Leonard Burman, W. Reed, J. Alm (2010)
A Call for Replication StudiesPublic Finance Review, 38
Cynthia Clark, Punit Arora, Patricia Gabaldón (2021)
Female Representation on Corporate Boards in Europe: The Interplay of Organizational Social Consciousness and InstitutionsJournal of Business Ethics, 180
M. Tayar (2017)
Ranking LGBT inclusion: Diversity ranking systems as institutional archetypesCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration, 34
(1992)
Reply to comments on: a model of auditors’ ethical decision process
M. Uribe-Bohorquez, Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero, Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez (2018)
Women on boards and efficiency in a business-orientated environmentCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Harvard Management Update
M. Torchia, A. Calabrò, M. Huse, M. Brogi (2010)
Critical Mass Theory and Women Directors' Contribution to Board Strategic TasksIO: Firm Structure
B. Charumathi, Habeebu Rahman (2019)
Do Women on Boards Influence Climate Change Disclosures to CDP? – Evidence from Large Indian CompaniesAustralasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal
P. Wicker, Svenja Feiler, C. Breuer (2020)
Board gender diversity, critical masses, and organizational problems of non-profit sport clubsEuropean Sport Management Quarterly, 22
(2019)
Best corporate citizens
R. Paton, L. Dempster (2002)
Managing Change from a Gender PerspectiveEuropean Management Journal, 20
J. Bartlett, J. Pallas, Magnus Frostenson (2013)
Reputation and legitimacy: accreditation and rankings to assess organizations
Michael Shaub (1994)
An analysis of the association of traditional demographic variables with the moral reasoning of auditing students and auditorsJournal of Accounting Education, 12
Gianluca Ginesti, Carlo Drago, Riccardo Macchioni, Giuseppe Sannino (2018)
Female board participation and annual report readability in firms with boardroom connectionsGender in Management: An International Journal, 33
Richard Bernardi, David Bean, Kristen Weippert (2005)
Minority Membership on Boards of Directors: A Case for Requiring Pictures of Boards in Annual ReportsCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 16
A. Issa, Hong-xing Fang (2019)
The impact of board gender diversity on corporate social responsibility in the Arab Gulf statesGender in Management: An International Journal
L. Cabeza‐García, Roberto Fernández‐Gago, Mariano Nieto (2018)
Do Board Gender Diversity and Director Typology Impact CSR Reporting?WGSRN: Gender Difference in Corporate Governance & Finance (Topic)
Isabel Corti, Nuria Babío, Laura Candamio (2017)
Is my professional future biased for gender perceptions? A study for the Spanish case with public policy proposals on education
Richard Bernardi, Veronica Threadgill (2010)
Women Directors and Corporate Social Responsibility
Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35
Richard Bernardi, Donald Arnold (2004)
Testing the 'Inverted-U' Phenomenon in Moral Development on Recently Promoted Senior Managers and PartnersContemporary Accounting Research, 21
M. Bannò, Viola Nicolardi (2020)
Women's participation on boards of directors: the effects on business growth and profitabilitySinergie Italian Journal of Management, 38
S. Terjesen, R. Sealy, Val Singh (2009)
Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research AgendaCorporate Governance: An International Review, 17
Meredith Larkin, Richard Bernardi, Susan Bosco (2013)
Does Female Representation on Boards of Directors Associate with Increased Transparency and Ethical BehaviorAccounting and The Public Interest, 13
(2020b)
World’s most admired companies
(2020)
Gender representation on corporate boards of directors
M. Torchia, A. Calabrò, M. Huse (2011)
Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical MassJournal of Business Ethics, 102
Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, Lázaro Rodríguez‐Ariza, María-del-Carmen Granada-Abarzuza (2021)
The Influence of Female Directors and Institutional Pressures on Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms in Latin AmericaJournal of Risk and Financial Management
Ammad Ahmed, R. Monem, D. Delaney, Chew Ng (2017)
Gender diversity in corporate boards and continuous disclosure: Evidence from Australia ☆Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13
Richard Bernardi, Donald Arnold (1997)
An Examination of Moral Development within Public Accounting by Gender, Staff Level, and Firm*Contemporary Accounting Research, 14
The purpose of this study is to extend Landry et al.’s (2016) work and examines the possible association between corporations having three or more female directors and these companies being features on corporate recognition lists.Design/methodology/approachThis study examines a sample of 335 corporations ranked as Fortune 500 corporations in the period 2013–2019. The authors test for the association between the percent of corporations that had three or more female directors and the percent of these corporations on external recognition lists.FindingsThe data indicate that the percent of corporations with three or more female directors more than doubled between 2013 and 2019; this change was accompanied by an increase in the percent of presence of these companies in corporate recognition lists. The percent of corporations that had three or more female directors was significantly associated with the percent of these corporations on external recognition lists.Research limitations/implicationsThe first is the sample selection process; this study used only publicly traded corporations that were included in the Fortune 500 between 2013 through 2019. The second limitation is that this study did not include data on board members considered minorities.Practical implicationsThe findings imply that there is a strong link between gender diversity on boards and being featured on corporate recognition lists, which means that firms who care about corporate social responsibility-related works, and more instrumentally, care about being on such lists should reconsider the gender balance on their boards.Originality/valueThis study extends this work for a time period in which the number of corporations with three or more female directors has significantly increased.
Gender in Management An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 3, 2023
Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; Women directors; Board composition
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.