Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Anne Koenig, A. Eagly, A. Mitchell, Tiina Ristikari (2011)
Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms.Psychological bulletin, 137 4
T. Scandura, G. Graen, M. Novak (1986)
When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader–member exchange and decision influence.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71
J. Halbesleben, Anthony Wheeler (2008)
The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leaveWork & Stress, 22
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, J. Paine, Daniel Bachrach (2000)
Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future ResearchJournal of Management, 26
Jason Grissom, Jill Nicholson‐Crotty, Lael Keiser (2012)
Does My Boss's Gender Matter? Explaining Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover in the Public SectorJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22
James Dulebohn, W. Bommer, R. Liden, Robyn Brouer, G. Ferris (2012)
A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member ExchangeJournal of Management, 38
L. Tourigny, Jian Han, V. Baba (2017)
Does gender matter?: A study of trust and its outcomes in the manufacturing sector in mainland ChinaGender in Management: An International Journal, 32
Leah Sheppard, Karl Aquino (2013)
Much Ado About Nothing? Observers' Problematization of Women's Same-Sex Conflict at WorkAcademy of Management Perspectives, 27
(2015)
Gender Indicators
C. Crossley, R. Bennett, S. Jex, J. Burnfield (2007)
Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 4
S. Hobfoll (1989)
Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.The American psychologist, 44 3
B. Collins, Carla Burrus, Rustin Meyer (2014)
Gender Differences in the Impact of Leadership Styles on Subordinate Embeddedness and Job SatisfactionLeadership Quarterly, 25
R. Ilies, J. Nahrgang, F. Morgeson (2007)
Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 1
B. Collins, K. Mossholder, Shannon Taylor (2012)
Does process fairness affect job performance? It only matters if they plan to stayJournal of Organizational Behavior, 33
Academy of Management Journal, 44
Rachel Fyall, B. Gazley (2015)
Applying Social Role Theory to Gender and Volunteering in Professional AssociationsVOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26
Jeremye Cohen (2006)
The aging nursing workforce: How to retain experienced nurses.Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives, 51 4
Dae-seok Kang, J. Stewart, Hayeon Kim (2011)
The effects of perceived external prestige, ethical organizational climate, and leader‐member exchange (LMX) quality on employees' commitments and their subsequent attitudesPersonnel Review, 40
S. Thompson, Eric Lougheed (2012)
Frazzled by Facebook? An Exploratory Study of Gender Differences in Social Network Communication among Undergraduate Men and WomenCollege student journal, 46
R. Farr‐wharton, Y. Brunetto, K. Shacklock (2011)
Professionals' supervisor–subordinate relationships, autonomy and commitment in Australia: a leader–member exchange theory perspectiveThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22
R. Liden, J. Maslyn (1998)
Multidimensionafity of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale DevelopmentJournal of Management, 24
Scott Schieman, Taralyn Mcmullen (2008)
Relational Demography in the Workplace and Health: An Analysis of Gender and the Subordinate–Superordinate Role-Set∗Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49
R. Snipes, S. Oswald, A. Armenakis, Michael Latour (2005)
The effects of specific job satisfaction facets on customer perceptions of service quality: An employee-level analysisQuality Engineering, 51
V. Callan (1993)
Subordinate Manager Communication in Different Sex Dyads - Consequences for Job-SatisfactionJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66
A. Eagly, Blair Johnson (1990)
Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-AnalysisPsychological Bulletin, 108
A. Eagly, Mary Johannesen-Schmidt, M. Engen (2003)
Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men.Psychological bulletin, 129 4
J. Spence, Camille Buckner (2000)
Instrumental and Expressive Traits, Trait Stereotypes, and Sexist Attitudes: What Do They Signify?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24
Kenneth Harris, Anthony Wheeler, K. Kacmar (2011)
The mediating role of organizational job embeddedness in the LMX-outcomes relationshipsLeadership Quarterly, 22
Jian Peng, Yushuai Chen, Ying Xia, Yaxuan Ran (2017)
Workplace loneliness, leader-member exchange and creativity: The cross-level moderating role of leader compassionPersonality and Individual Differences, 104
T. Mitchell, Brooks Holtom, T. Lee, Chris Sablynski, M. Erez (2001)
WHY PEOPLE STAY: USING JOB EMBEDDEDNESS TO PREDICT VOLUNTARY TURNOVERAcademy of Management Journal, 44
The Leadership Quarterly, 23
Sex Roles, 51
Isabel Cuadrado, Marisol Navas, F. Molero, E. Ferrer, J. Morales (2012)
Gender Differences in Leadership Styles as a Function of Leader and Subordinates' Sex and Type of OrganizationJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 42
Tomoki Sekiguchi, James Burton, Chris Sablynski (2008)
THE ROLE OF JOB EMBEDDEDNESS ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS WITH LEADER–MEMBER EXCHANGE AND ORGANIZATION‐BASED SELF‐ESTEEMPersonnel Psychology, 61
P. Costa, A. Terracciano, R. McCrae (2001)
Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings.Journal of personality and social psychology, 81 2
Yushuai Chen, Zhonglin Wen, Jian Peng, Xiqin Liu (2016)
Leader-follower congruence in loneliness, LMX and turnover intentionJournal of Managerial Psychology, 31
Brian Swider, W. Boswell, Ryan Zimmerman (2010)
Examining the Job Search-Turnover Relationship: The Role of Embeddedness, Job Satisfaction, and Available AlternativesIndividual Issues & Organizational Behavior eJournal
A. Eagly (2009)
The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender.The American psychologist, 64 8
Ardala Jackson, J. Alberti, R. Snipes (2014)
An Examination of the Impact of Gender on Leadership Style and Employee Job Satisfaction in the Modern WorkplaceJournal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 18
A. Eagly, S. Karau, Mona Makhijani (1995)
Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis.Psychological bulletin, 117 1
E. Kushell, Rae Newton (1986)
Gender, leadership style, and subordinate satisfaction: An experimentSex Roles, 14
A. Eagly, Mary Johannesen-Schmidt (2001)
The Leadership Styles of Women and MenJournal of Social Issues, 57
A. Morrison, M. Glinow (1990)
Women and minorities in management.American Psychologist, 45
Journal of Management and Public Policy, 4
Sabine Sczesny, J. Bosak, Daniel Neff, B. Schyns (2004)
Gender Stereotypes and the Attribution of Leadership Traits: A Cross-Cultural ComparisonSex Roles, 51
M. Engen, T. Willemsen (2004)
Sex and Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis of Research Published in the 1990sPsychological Reports, 94
This paper aims to examine the quality of the relationship between a supervisor and their subordinate, conceptualised as leader member exchange (LMX), and the mediating influence of subordinate’s job embeddedness on job satisfaction. The LMX model considered the four-gender dominant leadership style facets, female – affect and loyalty (communal), and male – contribution and professional respect (agentic). Social role theory was applied to explain societies influence on leadership style. The moderating influence of supervisor gender on the relationship of LMX facets and subordinate embeddedness is investigated.Design/methodology/approachThis cross-sectional survey study of 213 self-selected employed participants investigated the mediation of job embeddedness LMX and job embeddedness and the moderation impact of supervisor gender on this mediation.FindingsJob embeddedness mediated the relationship between all four facets of LMX and job satisfaction. Supervisor gender did not moderate the relationships of the four LMX facets and job embeddedness. These findings highlight the potential impact of a homogeniuos sample in relation to industry type and culture as this may impact on the findings. That is, participants in this study were predominantly females working in female dominant industries.Originality/valueThis study builds on the work of Collins et al. (2014) who examined the moderating impact of subordinate gender on the mediating relationship of job embeddedness on the relationship between LMX facets and job satisfaction. Previously, the gender role of supervisors on this relationship was not explored.
Gender in Management An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 21, 2021
Keywords: Gender; Job satisfaction; Job embeddedness; Leader member exchange
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.