Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Does anonymising job applications reduce gender bias?

Does anonymising job applications reduce gender bias? Anonymous recruitment seeks to limit managers’ reliance on stereotypes in employment decisions, thereby reducing discrimination. This paper aims to explore how managers interpret the information embedded in anonymised job applications and how they interpret the organisational priorities driving the adoption of anonymous recruitment.Design/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviews with 30 managers in two Australian public sector organisations were analysed.FindingsThe results showed that managers used implicit signals and cues to infer the gender identities of applicants in anonymised applications, reintroducing the possibility of bias. Managers perceived that anonymous recruitment sent positive external signals to prospective employees but were sceptical about its effectiveness.Research limitations/implicationsThe results showed that removing applicants’ names and identifying information from applications may not be sufficient to reduce bias. In organisations where managers are sympathetic to equity and diversity issues, use of anonymous recruitment may provoke resentment if managers perceive organisational distrust or inconsistent objectives. Limitations regarding the size and nature of the sample are acknowledged.Practical implicationsOrganisations seeking to reduce gender discrimination in recruitment may consider adopting standardised application procedures or training managers to understand how stereotypes affect evaluations. Organisations should also assess managerial support for, and understanding of, anonymous recruitment prior to implementation.Originality/valueThe findings add to existing knowledge regarding the effects of implicit gender signals in managers’ assessments and the effectiveness of anonymous recruitment in reducing gender bias. It also contributes to signalling theory by examining how managers interpret the signals conveyed in organisational policies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Gender in Management: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Does anonymising job applications reduce gender bias?

Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/does-anonymising-job-applications-reduce-gender-bias-Y2f5iuxK6Q
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1754-2413
DOI
10.1108/gm-03-2018-0037
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Anonymous recruitment seeks to limit managers’ reliance on stereotypes in employment decisions, thereby reducing discrimination. This paper aims to explore how managers interpret the information embedded in anonymised job applications and how they interpret the organisational priorities driving the adoption of anonymous recruitment.Design/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviews with 30 managers in two Australian public sector organisations were analysed.FindingsThe results showed that managers used implicit signals and cues to infer the gender identities of applicants in anonymised applications, reintroducing the possibility of bias. Managers perceived that anonymous recruitment sent positive external signals to prospective employees but were sceptical about its effectiveness.Research limitations/implicationsThe results showed that removing applicants’ names and identifying information from applications may not be sufficient to reduce bias. In organisations where managers are sympathetic to equity and diversity issues, use of anonymous recruitment may provoke resentment if managers perceive organisational distrust or inconsistent objectives. Limitations regarding the size and nature of the sample are acknowledged.Practical implicationsOrganisations seeking to reduce gender discrimination in recruitment may consider adopting standardised application procedures or training managers to understand how stereotypes affect evaluations. Organisations should also assess managerial support for, and understanding of, anonymous recruitment prior to implementation.Originality/valueThe findings add to existing knowledge regarding the effects of implicit gender signals in managers’ assessments and the effectiveness of anonymous recruitment in reducing gender bias. It also contributes to signalling theory by examining how managers interpret the signals conveyed in organisational policies.

Journal

Gender in Management: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 21, 2018

Keywords: Gender; Managers; Discrimination; Anonymous recruitment

References

  • Do anonymous job application procedures level the playing field?
    Åslund, O.; Nordström Skans, O.
  • Balancing the Future: The Australian Public Service Gender Equality Strategy 2016-2019
  • Australian Public Service Statistical Bulletin, 2016-17
  • Personnel selection as a signaling game
    Bangerter, A.; Roulin, N.; König, C.J.
  • Unintended effects of anonymous resumes
    Behaghel, L.; Crépon, B.; Barbanchon, T.L.
  • Developing the research basis for controlling bias in hiring
    Bendick, M.; Nunes, A.P.
  • Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination
    Bertrand, M.; Mullainathan, S.
  • Using thematic analysis in psychology
    Braun, V.; Clarke, V.
  • Effects of applicant personality on resume evaluations
    Burns, G.N.; Christiansen, N.D.; Morris, M.B.; Periard, D.A.; Coaster, J.A.
  • You will be known by the company you keep: understanding the social identity concerns of job seekers
    Carter, N.T.; Highhouse, S.; Cable, D.M.; , Yu; K.Y.T.
  • Recruiters’ inferences of applicant personality based on resume screening: do paper people have a personality?
    Cole, M.S.; Feild, H.S.; Giles, W.F.; Harris, S.G.
  • Signaling theory: a review and assessment
    Connelly, B.L.; Certo, S.T.; Ireland, R.D.; Reutzel, C.R.
  • Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty?
    Correll, S.J.; Benard, S.; Paik, I.
  • Organizational cynicism
    Dean, J.W.; Brandes, P.; Dharwadkar, R.
  • Implicit age cues in resumes: subtle effects on hiring discrimination
    Derous, E.; Decoster, J.
  • Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes
    Duguid, M.M.; Thomas-Hunt, M.C.
  • The boss doesn’t want your résumé
    Feintzeig, R.
  • Managerial perspectives on implicit bias, affirmative action, and merit
    Foley, M.; Williamson, S.
  • Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
    Greenwald, A.G.; Banaji, M.R.
  • Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder
    Heilman, M.E.
  • Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination
    Heilman, M.E.; Eagly, A.H.
  • Ethnicity effects in graduates’ résumé content
    Hiemstra, A.M.F.; Derous, E.; Serlie, A.W.; Born, M.P.
  • Women rising: the unseen barriers
    Ibarra, H.; Ely, R.J.; Kolb, D.M.
  • What companies use blind/anonymous resumes and what benefits have they reported?
    Joseph, J.
  • Anonymous job applications of fresh Ph.D. economists
    Krause, A.; Rinne, U.; Zimmermann, K.
  • Anonymous job applications in Europe
    Krause, A.; Rinne, U.; Zimmermann, K.F.
  • HR and the line: the distribution of HR activities in Australian organisations
    Kulik, C.T.; Bainbridge, H.T.J.
  • Name-blind recruitment: a commitment to diversity
    Manzoni, J.
  • With recruitment I always feel I need to listen to my gut’: the role of intuition in employee selection
    Miles, A.; Sadler-Smith, E.
  • Assessing gender biases: development and initial validation of the gender role stereotypes scale
    Mills, M.J.; Culbertson, S.S.; Huffman, A.H.; Connell, A.R.
  • Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
    Moss-Racusin, C.A.; Dovidio, J.F.; Brescoll, V.L.; Graham, M.J.; Handelsman, J.
  • Detecting discrimination in audit and correspondence studies
    Neumark, D.
  • Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: an audit study
    Neumark, D.; Bank, R.J.; Van Nort, K.D.
  • Gender role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics: the case of South Africa
    Nkomo, S.M.; Booysen, L.A.E.
  • Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects
    Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W.
  • Anonymized Recruitment Pilot Project – Final Report
  • Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence
    Purcell, J.; Hutchinson, S.
  • Untangling the relationship between gender and leadership
    Rhee, K.S.; Sigler, T.H.
  • Testing for sexual discrimination in the labour market
    Riach, P.A.; Rich, J.
  • An experimental investigation of sexual discrimination in hiring in the English labour market
    Riach, P.A.; Rich, J.
  • Anonymous job applications and hiring discrimination
    Rinne, U.
  • Job market signaling
    Spence, M.
  • Discrimination against female migrants wearing headscarves
    Weichselbaumer, D.
  • Unconscious bias training: the silver bullet’ for gender equity?
    Williamson, S.; Foley, M.
  • Combating gender bias in modern workplaces
    Wynn, A.T.; Correll, S.J.; Risman, B.; Froyum, C.; Scarborough, W.