Doctors' experiences with a quality assurance programme

Doctors' experiences with a quality assurance programme Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore doctors' experiences with participation in a quality assurance programme for gastrointestinal endoscopy (Gastronet). Design/methodology/approach – An explorative and qualitative approach was used, and data were generated through semi‐structured interviews with eight doctors (endoscopists) in Norway. Findings – The respondents' notion of a “high‐quality colonoscopy” included being able to communicate with the patient while performing the technical procedure. They were reluctant to use analgesics to improve their score on the rate of painful examinations due to the negative effects of analgesics on the communication with the patient. The individual feedback reports on colonoscopy quality had been read by most respondents and some respondents described they had used the reports actively to monitor performance. There was some reluctance towards the programme among the respondents since some performance measures were thought to have a negative effect on the atmosphere in the endoscopy suite. Research limitations/implications – The small sample size and the homogenous cultural setting limit the generalisability of the results to other countries. Practical implications – The concept of “high‐quality colonoscopy” might be ambiguous, and it is important to clarify what quality means when implementing a quality assurance programme for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Workshops and educational meetings facilitate two‐way communication between leaders and participants in the quality assurance programme, and may build ownership and increase motivation among participants. Originality/value – In addition to quality indicators, it is important to agree upon the meaning of “quality” when initiating a quality assurance programme. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical Governance: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Doctors' experiences with a quality assurance programme

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/doctors-experiences-with-a-quality-assurance-programme-ko0fHBOLRS
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1477-7274
DOI
10.1108/14777271211273189
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore doctors' experiences with participation in a quality assurance programme for gastrointestinal endoscopy (Gastronet). Design/methodology/approach – An explorative and qualitative approach was used, and data were generated through semi‐structured interviews with eight doctors (endoscopists) in Norway. Findings – The respondents' notion of a “high‐quality colonoscopy” included being able to communicate with the patient while performing the technical procedure. They were reluctant to use analgesics to improve their score on the rate of painful examinations due to the negative effects of analgesics on the communication with the patient. The individual feedback reports on colonoscopy quality had been read by most respondents and some respondents described they had used the reports actively to monitor performance. There was some reluctance towards the programme among the respondents since some performance measures were thought to have a negative effect on the atmosphere in the endoscopy suite. Research limitations/implications – The small sample size and the homogenous cultural setting limit the generalisability of the results to other countries. Practical implications – The concept of “high‐quality colonoscopy” might be ambiguous, and it is important to clarify what quality means when implementing a quality assurance programme for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Workshops and educational meetings facilitate two‐way communication between leaders and participants in the quality assurance programme, and may build ownership and increase motivation among participants. Originality/value – In addition to quality indicators, it is important to agree upon the meaning of “quality” when initiating a quality assurance programme.

Journal

Clinical Governance: An International JournalEmerald Publishing

Published: Oct 12, 2012

Keywords: Clinical governance; Continuous quality improvement; Health care quality; Qualitative research; Training; User involvement; Quality assurance; Norway

References

  • Stakeholder preferences for cancer care performance indicators
    Gagliardi, A.; Lemieux‐Charles, L.; Brown, A.; Sullivan, T.; Goel, V.
  • The current state of performance measurement in health care
    Loeb, J.M.
  • Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts
    Sitzia, J.; Wood, N.
  • Evolution and outcomes of a quality improvement program
    Thor, J.; Herrlin, B.; Wittlov, K.; Ovretveit, J.; Brommels, M.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month