Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Do students belong to Florida’s creative class?

Do students belong to Florida’s creative class? In a knowledge-based society, one of the main driving forces of prosperity at city and regional levels is the ability to attract students and recently qualified graduates. The purpose of this paper is to identify the urban factors that contribute to “attractiveness” from a student perspective and to subsequently analyse the influence of these factors on students’ location choices. In the corresponding case study, the criteria identified were used to evaluate student satisfaction with the German city of Osnabrück.Design/methodology/approachA multi-level empirical research concept was used to analyse the relevant criteria. Focus group discussions served as the basis to design and conduct a survey of almost 2,300 students in the university city of Osnabrück at the end of 2016. A follow-up study in November 2017 at two universities in Berlin provided data for comparison.FindingsAccessible – safe – clean and with affordable housing: these terms sum up the core expectations that students have of an attractive city. In contrast to the findings of Richard Florida regarding the creative class, cultural opportunities, exciting nightlife and a multicultural population were not important factors among the survey participants.Research limitations/implicationsAs the study was conducted in two cities only, the findings cannot be generalised. It should be replicated in at least five other cities to validate and compare the research findings presented here. Furthermore, this study focused on the factors influencing the attractiveness of the city as a whole. However, the attractiveness of a specific neighbourhood may be of greater relevance to the decision-making process. As housing plays a major role, students’ particular needs with regard to accommodation should also be examined at greater depth.Practical implicationsInsights generated by the empirical study provide relevant information that may assist city stakeholders in taking effective measures regarding place management to attract and retain students.Originality/valueTo date, little research has been undertaken to empirically examine the specific factors that German students look for when deciding where to study and live. The goal of this paper is to present new empirical insights concerning the quality-of-life factors that influence students’ decision-making processes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Place Management and Development Emerald Publishing

Do students belong to Florida’s creative class?

Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/do-students-belong-to-florida-s-creative-class-992KQn82jg
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1753-8335
DOI
10.1108/jpmd-07-2018-0047
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In a knowledge-based society, one of the main driving forces of prosperity at city and regional levels is the ability to attract students and recently qualified graduates. The purpose of this paper is to identify the urban factors that contribute to “attractiveness” from a student perspective and to subsequently analyse the influence of these factors on students’ location choices. In the corresponding case study, the criteria identified were used to evaluate student satisfaction with the German city of Osnabrück.Design/methodology/approachA multi-level empirical research concept was used to analyse the relevant criteria. Focus group discussions served as the basis to design and conduct a survey of almost 2,300 students in the university city of Osnabrück at the end of 2016. A follow-up study in November 2017 at two universities in Berlin provided data for comparison.FindingsAccessible – safe – clean and with affordable housing: these terms sum up the core expectations that students have of an attractive city. In contrast to the findings of Richard Florida regarding the creative class, cultural opportunities, exciting nightlife and a multicultural population were not important factors among the survey participants.Research limitations/implicationsAs the study was conducted in two cities only, the findings cannot be generalised. It should be replicated in at least five other cities to validate and compare the research findings presented here. Furthermore, this study focused on the factors influencing the attractiveness of the city as a whole. However, the attractiveness of a specific neighbourhood may be of greater relevance to the decision-making process. As housing plays a major role, students’ particular needs with regard to accommodation should also be examined at greater depth.Practical implicationsInsights generated by the empirical study provide relevant information that may assist city stakeholders in taking effective measures regarding place management to attract and retain students.Originality/valueTo date, little research has been undertaken to empirically examine the specific factors that German students look for when deciding where to study and live. The goal of this paper is to present new empirical insights concerning the quality-of-life factors that influence students’ decision-making processes.

Journal

Journal of Place Management and Development – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 15, 2019

Keywords: Resident satisfaction; Urban management; Location factors of the creative class; Mobility decisions of students and skilled professionals; Place quality evaluation

References

  • Definitions of place branding – working towards a resolution
    Anholt, S.
  • Beyond the logo: Brand management for cities
    Ashworth, G.; Kavaratzis, M.
  • Brand-driven identity development of places
    Botschen, G.; Promberger, K.; Bernhart, J.
  • Home from home? Locational choices of international ‘creative class’ workers
    Brown, J.
  • Locations of labor market entry by German university graduates. Is (regional) beauty in the eye of the beholder?
    Buenstorf, G.; Geissler, M.; Krabel, S.
  • What attracts and retains knowledge workers/students. The quality of place or career opportunities? The cases of Montreal and Ottawa
    Darchen, S.; Tremblay, D.-G.
  • The attraction/retention of knowledge workers and the creative city paradigm: can we plan for the talents and at what cost: the case of Montreal
    Darchen, S.; Tremblay, D.-G.
  • Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis? A position paper
    Esmaeilpoorarabi, N.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Guaralda, M.
  • Towards an urban quality framework. Determining critical measures for different geographical scales to attract and retain talent in cities
    Esmaeilpoorarabi, N.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Guaralda, M.
  • Place quality in innovation clusters. An empirical analysis of global best practices from Singapore, Helsinki, New York, and Sydney
    Esmaeilpoorarabi, N.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Guaralda, M.
  • Evaluating place quality in innovation districts. A delphic hierarchy process approach
    Esmaeilpoorarabi, N.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Guaralda, M.; Kamruzzaman, M.
  • The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life
    Florida, R.
  • Location choices of the creative class. Does tolerance make a difference?
    Haisch, T.; Klöpper, C.
  • Making sense of place. From cold to warm city marketing
    Hospers, G.
  • A great place to live, work and play
    Insch, A.; Florek, M.
  • University students’ needs and satisfaction with their host city
    Insch, A.; Sun, B.
  • My city – my brand. The different roles of residents in place branding
    Kalandides, A.; Braun, E.; Kavaratzis, M.; Zenker, S.
  • Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces: insights from European best practices
    Pancholi, S.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Guaralda, M.
  • Governance that matters. Identifying place making challenges of Melbourne’s Monash Employment Cluster
    Pancholi, S.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Guaralda, M.
  • Attributes of successful place-making in knowledge and innovation spaces. Evidence from Brisbane’s Diamantina knowledge precinct
    Pancholi, S.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Guaralda, M.
  • Societal integration that matters. Place making experience of Macquarie Park Innovation District, Sydney
    Pancholi, S.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Guaralda, M.
  • Student communities and landscapes of creativity. How Venice - ‘The world’s most touristed city’ - is changing
    Russo, A.P.; Sans, A.A.
  • Toward a sustainable relationship between city and university
    Russo, A.P.; van den Berg, L.; Lavanga, M.
  • I don’t care about the city’. The role of connections in job-related mobility decisions of skilled professionals
    Tippel, C.; Plöger, J.; Becker, A.
  • Aufbau einer Stadtmarke mit design thinking
    Wesselmann, S.
  • Comparing: knowledge-based urban development of Vancouver, Melbourne, Manchester and Boston
    Yigitcanlar, T.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Metaxiotis, K.; Carrillo, F.J.
  • Making space and place for knowledge communities: lessons for Australien practice
    Yigitcanlar, T.; Dur, F.
  • Who’s your target? The creative class as a target group for place branding
    Zenker, S.
  • Eine pragmatische Generation im Aufbruch