Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Hemang Desai, Chris Hogan, Michael Wilkins (2004)
The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management TurnoverSMU Cox: Accounting (Topic)
Karen Hennes, A. Leone, B. Miller (2008)
The Importance of Distinguishing Errors from Irregularities in Restatement Research: The Case of Restatements and CEO/CFO TurnoverThe Accounting Review, 83
Cristi Gleason, N. Jenkins, W. Johnson (2007)
The Contagion Effects of Accounting RestatementsBehavioral & Experimental Accounting
R. Beatty
Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial public offerings
P. Hribar, N. Jenkins, Juan Wang (2004)
Institutional Investors and Accounting RestatementsFinancial Accounting
W. Wilson (2008)
An Empirical Analysis of the Decline in the Information Content of Earnings Following RestatementsThe Accounting Review, 83
S. Srinivasan
Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members
Rebecca Files, E. Swanson, Senyo Tse (2009)
Stealth Disclosure of Accounting RestatementsFinancial Accounting
L. Turner, T. Weirich
A closer look at financial statement restatements: analyzing the reasons behind the trend
D. Reilly
No more ‘stealth restating’
Jeffrey Callen, J. Livnat, D. Segal (2005)
Accounting Restatements, 15
T. Wong, S. Teoh (1993)
Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response CoefficientAccounting review: A quarterly journal of the American Accounting Association, 68
P. Griffin (2003)
A League of Their Own? Financial Analysts' Responses to Restatements and Corrective DisclosuresJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 18
Zoe-Vonna Palmrose, V. Richardson, Susan Scholz (2001)
Determinants of Market Reactions to Restatement AnnouncementsCapital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal
E. Gordon, E. Henry, M. Peytcheva, L. Sun
Disclosure credibility and market reaction to restatements
Sanjeev Bhojraj, Charles Lee, Derek Oler (2003)
What's My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market ResearchCorporate Finance: Valuation
R. Prentice (2004)
Student Guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
B. Branson, D. Pagach
Recent controversies in accounting for operating leases and leasehold improvements
J. Callen, J. Livnat, D. Segal
Accounting restatements: are they always bad news for investors?
(2011)
Consequences of Financial Reporting Failure for Outside Directors:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Final Rule: Additional Form 8‐K Disclosure Requirements an Acceleration of Filing Date
N. Sharp
Do firms strategically manage the timing and transparency of accounting restatement disclosures?
Jonathan Karpoff, D. Lee, Gerald Martin (2008)
The Cost to Firms of Cooking the BooksJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43
Purpose – Effective August 23, 2004, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires all firms to disclose restatements via an item 4.02 Form 8‐K filing. However, a significant number of firms continue to disclose restatements using means other than an 8‐K. Commonly referred to as stealth restatements, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the materiality of restatements disclosed in either the 10‐K or the 10‐Q by comparing them to those disclosed via 8‐K. Design/methodology/approach – Univariate and multivariate analyses compare the characteristics of and the market reaction to 10‐K/10‐Q restatements to those of 8‐K restatements. Findings – The authors find stealth restatements are more likely to be those not affecting net income, with longer filing delays, not subject to SEC investigation and made by firms audited by non‐big four accounting firms. The authors document a negative market reaction to 8‐K restatements around the restatement disclosure date. However, for stealth restatements they find no market reaction around the 10‐K/10‐Q filing date and for up to 22 trading days after the 10‐K/10‐Q filings. Research limitations/implications – The study shows a significant difference in materiality between stealth and 8‐K restatements. Practical implications – The study is important to investors, regulators and academics because it supports the notion that stealth restatements include less significant information relative to that disclosed in 8‐K restatements. This result is in line with the SEC disclosure requirement. Originality/value – The significant number of stealth restatements since 2004 begs the question as to what kind of information is being disclosed in these restatements. The paper responds to this question.
Accounting Research Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 19, 2011
Keywords: United States of America; Disclosure; Restatements; Stealth; Item 4.02; Form 8‐K
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.