Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Do no harm and do more good too: connecting the SDGs with business and human rights and political CSR theory

Do no harm and do more good too: connecting the SDGs with business and human rights and political... This paper aims to explain how companies can benefit from their human rights due diligence process to identify opportunities for sustainable development goals (SDGs) activities in an operationalisation of political corporate social responsibility (PCSR).Design/methodology/approachCombining PCSR, SDGs and business and human rights (BHR) literature, the paper develops an extension of the risk-based due diligence process described by the BHR literature, helping companies identify societal needs to which they may contribute in accordance with PCSR through engaging in the SDGs.FindingsCompanies can benefit from resources they already invest in due diligence to identify their adverse human rights impacts, by drawing on the insights gained on broader needs, including human rights, to which they may contribute. This can help them develop appropriate interventions to address local needs and advance their moral legitimacy through assisting in SDG-relevant fulfilment of human rights.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper provides theory-based guidance on how companies can assess their capacity for contributing societal value through human rights-oriented SDG interventions. Future empirical research may explore how companies apply the extended due diligence process to assess needs and determine relevant actions.Practical implicationsThe paper offers a principle-based analytical approach for integrating the “do no harm” imperative of BHR theory with PCSR’s call for business assistance in the delivery of public goods and the SDGs’ call for business action to “do good’.Social implicationsThis paper enables enhanced business implementation of the SDGs in line with PCSR and human rights theory, especially the emergent field of business and human rights.Originality/valueThis study gives theory-based guidance for companies for SDG contributions based on innovative combination of literatures. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Corporate Governance Emerald Publishing

Do no harm and do more good too: connecting the SDGs with business and human rights and political CSR theory

Buhmann, Karin; Jonsson, Jonas; Fisker, Mette
Corporate Governance , Volume 19 (3): 15 – Jun 3, 2019
Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/do-no-harm-and-do-more-good-too-connecting-the-sdgs-with-business-and-ymNV0AJHE8
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1472-0701
DOI
10.1108/cg-01-2018-0030
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper aims to explain how companies can benefit from their human rights due diligence process to identify opportunities for sustainable development goals (SDGs) activities in an operationalisation of political corporate social responsibility (PCSR).Design/methodology/approachCombining PCSR, SDGs and business and human rights (BHR) literature, the paper develops an extension of the risk-based due diligence process described by the BHR literature, helping companies identify societal needs to which they may contribute in accordance with PCSR through engaging in the SDGs.FindingsCompanies can benefit from resources they already invest in due diligence to identify their adverse human rights impacts, by drawing on the insights gained on broader needs, including human rights, to which they may contribute. This can help them develop appropriate interventions to address local needs and advance their moral legitimacy through assisting in SDG-relevant fulfilment of human rights.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper provides theory-based guidance on how companies can assess their capacity for contributing societal value through human rights-oriented SDG interventions. Future empirical research may explore how companies apply the extended due diligence process to assess needs and determine relevant actions.Practical implicationsThe paper offers a principle-based analytical approach for integrating the “do no harm” imperative of BHR theory with PCSR’s call for business assistance in the delivery of public goods and the SDGs’ call for business action to “do good’.Social implicationsThis paper enables enhanced business implementation of the SDGs in line with PCSR and human rights theory, especially the emergent field of business and human rights.Originality/valueThis study gives theory-based guidance for companies for SDG contributions based on innovative combination of literatures.

Journal

Corporate Governance – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 3, 2019

Keywords: Human rights; Leverage; Sustainable development goals (SDGs); Political CSR; Moral legitimacy; Risk-based due diligence

References

  • Political corporate social responsibility and development
    Adelopo, I.; Yekini, K.; Raimi, L.; Jamali, D.; Karam, C.; Blowfield, M.
  • Endless misery of nimble fingers: the rana plaza disaster
    Akhter, S.
  • Corporations and human rights obligations
    Arnold, D.
  • Conceptualizing mining impacts, livelihoods and corporate community development in Melanesia
    Banks, G.; Kuir-Ayius, D.; Kombako, D.; Sagir, B.
  • The value of unregulated business-NGO interaction: a deliberative perspective
    Baur, D.; Arenas, D.
  • Managing CSR globally and locally: lessons from a CSR leader
    Brown, D.; Knudsen, J.S.
  • Navigating from ‘trainwreck’ to being ‘welcomed’: negotiation strategies and argumentative patterns in the development of the UN framework
    Buhmann, K.; Deva, S.; Bilchitz, D.
  • Public regulators and CSR: the ‘social licence to operate’ in recent united nations instruments on business and human rights and the juridification of CSR
    Buhmann, K.
  • Neglecting the proactive aspect of human rights due diligence? A critical appraisal of the EU’s Non-Financial reporting directive as a pillar one avenue for promoting pillar two action
    Buhmann, K.
  • International law and Corporate Social Responsibility: significance for social impacts of Arctic natural resource exploitation
    Buhmann, K.
  • Future perspectives: doing good but avoiding SDG-washing: creating relevant societal value without causing harm
    Buhmann, K.; Mulder, H.; Voort, S.V.
  • Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility
    Campbell, T.
  • Ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights
    Cragg, W.
  • The social license to operate
    Demuijnck, G.; Fasterling, B.
  • Corporate citizenship: rise or demise of a myth?
    Edward, P.; Willmott, H.
  • Health and safety at work
  • Introduction
    DiMaggio, P.J.; Powell, W.W.
  • Human rights due diligence as risk management: social risk versus human rights risk
    Fasterling, B.
  • Political corporate social responsibility: reviewing theories and setting new agendas
    Frynas, J.G.; Stephens, S.
  • Post 2015: a new era of accountability?
    Fukuda-Parr, S.; McNeill, D.
  • Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate social responsibility
    Greenwood, M.
  • Human rights and international business research: reflections on emerging market multinationals
    Giuliani, E.; Santangelo, G.D.; Wettstein, F.
  • Sustainable development goals and inclusive development
    Gupta, J.; Vegeling, C.
  • From employee representation to problem solving: mainstreaming OHS management
    Hasle, P.; Seim, R.; Refslund, B.
  • The universal declaration at 50 and the challenge of global markets
    Henkin, L.
  • Big pharma and social responsibility
    Hogerzeil, H.G.
  • Corporate-community relations in Nigeria’s oil industry: challenges and imperatives
    Idemudia, U.; Ite, U.
  • Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships
    Jamali, D.; Safieddine, A.; Rabbath, M.
  • Horizontal human rights law
    Knox, J.H.
  • The social responsibility in international business: from ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development
    Kolk, A.
  • Multinationals, CSR and partnerships in central African conflict countries
    Kolk, A.; Lenfant, F.
  • Human rights and positive corporate duties: the importance of corporate–state interaction
    Kolstad, I.
  • Bringing political context back into international business studies of human rights
    Kourula, A.; Mäkinen, J.
  • Can post-2015 sustainable development goals survive neoliberalism? A critical examination of the sustainable development–neoliberalism nexus in developing countries
    Kumi, E.; Arhin, A.; Yeboah, T.
  • Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility
    Mäkinen, J.; Kourula, A.
  • Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business
    Margolis, J.D.; Walsh, J.P.
  • Behind the mask: revealing the true face of corporate citizenship
    Matten, D.; Crane, A.; Chapple, W.
  • Corporate citizenship: towards an extended theoretical conceptualization
    Matten, D.; Crane, A.
  • Corporate partnerships for entrepreneurship: building the ecosystem in the Middle East and southeast Asia
    Murphy, S.
  • Universality, integration, and policy coherence for sustainable development: early SDG implementation in selected OECD countries
    O’Connor, D.; Mackie, J.; van Esveld, D.; Kim, H.; Scholz, I.; Weitz, N.
  • Corporate legitimacy as deliberation. A communicative framework
    Palazzo, G.; Scherer, A.G.
  • Corporate influence in the post-2015 process
    Pingeot, L.
  • The big idea: creating shared value. How to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth
    Porter, M.E.; Kramer, M.R.
  • Institutionalizing global governance: the role of the United Nations global compact
    Rasche, A.; Gilbert, D.
  • Making globalization work for all: achieving the SDGs through business respect for human rights
    Ruggie, J.G.
  • Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a habermasian perspective
    Scherer, A.G.; Palazzo, G.
  • The new political role of business in a globalized world – a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy
    Scherer, A.G.; Palazzo, G.
  • Managing for political corporate social responsibility: new challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0
    Scherer, A.G.; Rasche, A.; Palazzo, G.; Spicer, A.
  • The private sector and the SDGs: the need to move beyond ‘business as usual
    Scheyvens, R.; Banks, G.; Hughes, E.
  • Elements of a theory of human rights
    Sen, A.
  • An open letter to united nations secretary-general António Guterres and united nations private sector forum 2017 participants
  • The power of activism: assessing the impact of NGOs on global business
    Spar, D.L.; La Mure, L.T.
  • Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches
    Suchman, M.C.
  • Towards an integrative theory of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance
    Swanson, D.L.
  • Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
  • Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework
  • Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
  • Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: governing sustainable development in a globalized world
    Voegtlin, C.; Scherer, A.G.
  • Private global business regulation
    Vogel, D.
  • Human rights as a critique of instrumental CSR: corporate responsibility beyond the business case
    Wettstein, F.
  • Making noise about silent complicity: the moral inconsistency of the ‘protect, respect and remedy’ framework
    Wettstein, F.; Deva, S.; Bilchitz, D.
  • Normativity, ethics and the UN guiding principles on business and human rights: a critical assessment
    Wettstein, F.
  • Is the concept of ‘due diligence’ in the guiding principles coherent?
    Bonnitcha, J.; McCorquedale, R.