Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Calandro, S. Lane, Ranganna Dasari (2008)
A Practical Approach for Risk-Adjusting PerformanceMeasuring Business Excellence, 12
J. Zaremba (2009)
Corporate Social Responsibility and the Shaping of Global Public PolicyDevelopment in Practice, 19
Virginia Haufler (2001)
A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy
M. Hemmati (2002)
Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict
W. Lam (2010)
Governing the Commons
徐卿, 外国语学院南京 南京审计学院 (2010)
试析商务英语新词条"Responsible Competitiveness"
R. Gould (2012)
Open Innovation and Stakeholder EngagementJournal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7
John Cullen (2006)
Democratizing innovationJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 57
(2002)
Voluntary Approaches to Corporate Responsibility: Readings and a Resource Guide
Johan Jansson, A. Marell, A. Nordlund (2010)
Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco‐innovation adoptionJournal of Consumer Marketing, 27
Frances Tomlinson (2005)
Idealistic and Pragmatic Versions of the Discourse of PartnershipOrganization Studies, 26
Heiko Spitzeck, E. Hansen (2010)
Stakeholder Governance: How Stakeholders Influence Corporate Decision MakingO&M: Decision-Making in Organizations eJournal
(2010)
The NewRules of GreenMarketing: Strategies, Tools, and Inspiration for Sustainable Branding, Routledge, Abingdon
C. Lei (2006)
On "Green Marketing"Journal of Zhuzhou Institute of Technology
J. Roloff (2008)
Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder ManagementJournal of Business Ethics, 82
D. O'Rourke (2006)
Multi-stakeholder regulation: privatizing or socializing global labor standards?World Development, 34
Tore Fougner (2016)
Transnational governance and legitimacy
(2016)
Global sustainable investment review
(2004)
Governance and Multistakeholder Processes, IISD; International Institute for Sustainable Development
P. Sloan, David Oliver (2013)
Building Trust in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships: Critical Emotional Incidents and Practices of EngagementOrganization Studies, 34
(2014)
Introducing Greendex 2014: Enabling Behavior Change
J. Dawkins, Stewart Lewis (2003)
CSR in Stakeholde Expectations: And Their Implication for Company StrategyJournal of Business Ethics, 44
S. Waddock (2008)
Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate ResponsibilityAcademy of Management Perspectives, 22
K. Tanimoto (2012)
The emergent process of social innovation: multi-stakeholders perspectiveInternational Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 4
K. Tanimoto (2017)
The Implementation of CSR Management and Stakeholder Relations in Japan
Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 116
F. Scharpf (1997)
Economic Integration, Democracy and the Welfare StateJournal of European Public Policy, 4
J. Camino (2007)
Re-evaluating green marketing strategy : a stakeholder perspective.
D. Gilbert, A. Rasche, S. Waddock (2010)
Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability StandardsOrganizational Behavior & Key Stakeholders eJournal
Rüdiger Hahn, Christian Weidtmann (2012)
Transnational Governance, Deliberative Democracy, and the Legitimacy of ISO 26000Business & Society, 55
T. Benner, Wolfgang Reinicke, Janneke Witte (2004)
Multisectoral Networks in Global Governance: Towards a Pluralistic System of Accountability 1Government and Opposition, 39
(2012)
Why other electronics companies aren’t following apple’s lead on factory audits
R. Harrison, T. Newholm, D. Shaw (2005)
The Ethical Consumer
C. Eden, C. Huxham (2001)
The Negotiation of Purpose in Multi-Organizational Collaborative GroupsJournal of Management Studies, 38
P. Utting (2002)
REGULATING BUSINESS VIA MULTISTAKEHOLDER INITIATIVES: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
Sáchez Mena, G. Palazzo (2012)
Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiativesBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 22
Rüdiger Hahn, Christian Weidtmann (2016)
Transnational Governance, Deliberative Democracy, and the Legitimacy of ISO 26000: Analyzing the Case of a Global Multi-Stakeholder ProcessBusiness & Society, 55
(2001)
The DAC Guidelines - Strategies for Sustainable Development: Guidance for Development Co-operation
(2006)
Governance and Democracy: Comparing National
(2012)
No company follows Apple’s expanded China factory audits
S. Quack (2010)
Law, Expertise and Legitimacy in Transnational Economic Governance
M. Seitanidi, A. Crane (2009)
Implementing CSR Through Partnerships: Understanding the Selection, Design and Institutionalisation of Nonprofit-Business PartnershipsJournal of Business Ethics, 85
Jeroen Merk (2007)
The private regulation of labour standards: the case of the apparel and footwear industries
J. Roloff (2008)
A Life Cycle Model of Multi-Stakeholder NetworksWiley-Blackwell: Business Ethics: A European Review
W. Ratcliffe, C. Coulter (2015)
Green marketing
D. Davidson, K. Tanimoto, Laura Jun, Shallini Taneja, P. Taneja, Juelin Yin (2018)
Corporate Social Responsibility across Asia: A Review of Four Countries, 2
Mathias Koenig-Archibugi (2004)
Transnational Corporations and Public AccountabilityGovernment and Opposition, 39
J. Ruggie (2007)
Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International AgendaAmerican Journal of International Law, 101
(2016)
Global sustainable investment review 2016
Jaime Rivera-Camino (2007)
Re‐evaluating green marketing strategy: a stakeholder perspectiveEuropean Journal of Marketing, 41
Matthew Gitsham, Nadine Page (2014)
Designing Effective Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Platforms: Learning from the Experience of the UN Global Compact LEAD InitiativeSAM Advanced Management Journal, 79
A. Chandra, Maria Silva (2012)
Business Incubation in Chile: Development, Financing and Financial ServicesJournal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7
L. Fransen (2011)
Why Do Private Governance Organizations Not Converge? A Political-Institutional Analysis of Transnational Labor Standards RegulationPolitical Economy: International Political Economy eJournal
F. Scharpf (2009)
Legitimacy in the multilevel European polityEuropean Political Science Review, 1
L. Fransen (2012)
Multi-Stakeholder Governance and Voluntary Programme Interactions: Legitimation Politics in the Institutional Design of Corporate Social ResponsibilitySocio-economic Review, 10
(2012)
Sustainable Investment Alliance (2016), “Global sustainable investment review 2016”, GSIA
(2012)
chemicals”, Electronics TakeBackCoalition,March
K. Tanimoto (2004)
Changes in the Market Society and Corporate Social ResponsibilityAsian Business & Management, 3
Tim Bartley (2007)
Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions1American Journal of Sociology, 113
NGOs from around the globe deliver 'challenge' to electronics industry on toxic chemicals
Walter Lafeber (1995)
The World and the United StatesThe American Historical Review, 100
Ebsen Pedersen, P. Neergaard (2008)
From periphery to center: how CSR is integrated in mainstream performance management frameworksMeasuring Business Excellence, 12
This paper aims to examine the significance and challenges of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives organized by multi-stakeholders and to clarify the function of CSR initiatives: What is the significance of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)? What conditions are required for CSR initiatives to work satisfactorily? How do CSR standards function effectively in companies?Design/methodology/approachThe significance and challenges of multi-stakeholder CSR initiatives are clarified theoretically, based on previous literature from relevant research fields.FindingsMSIs are beyond the “dichotomy” of two traditional approaches to CSR, namely, voluntary vs mandatory. However MSIs do not automatically ensure good performance. We should discuss not only the legitimacy of MSIs but external monitoring and evaluation systems for responsible companies in the market, as well as organizational efforts to incorporate CSR standards into managerial processes.Social implicationsThis paper shows that an MSI is an important platform for establishing and promoting a CSR standard, and further that market maturity and stakeholder engagement are required to make CSR work.Originality/valueThe study explains that ceremonial compliance with CSR standards may be inevitable even where the legitimacy of an MSI is secured, and that we should recognize that monitoring and sanction systems in the market and an organizational approach to the incorporation of CSR in management practices are required.
Corporate Governance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 13, 2019
Keywords: Legitimacy; Global Governance; Stakeholder engagement; CSR initiative; Market maturity; Multi-stakeholder
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.