Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Do governance capacity and legitimacy affect citizens' satisfaction with COVID-19 management? Some evidence from South Asia

Do governance capacity and legitimacy affect citizens' satisfaction with COVID-19 management?... Theoretically, both democ/ratic legitimacy and government capacity are necessary for successful crisis management, like the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors argue that there are important variations for pandemic management in the developed and democratic world. However, are these equally needed in the developing world where democracy and capacity are present in varying degrees and in some countries with a vast deficit? This article analyzes how legitimacy and capacity affect citizens' satisfaction with the pandemic management in South Asia.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on a survey of 3,423 randomly selected respondents from Facebook users in South Asia. The survey data are presented and discussed along with information derived from secondary sources to put the data in the broader context of the South Asian countries. The authors apply ordinary linear regression for statistical analysis.FindingsThe findings suggest that citizens are content with the performance of government institutions in COVID-19 management. They emphasize material well-being, such as relief provisions and financial incentives during the crisis period. They are, however, less concerned about the legitimacy dimension, although democracy in South Asia is flawed with excessive restrictions on public freedom during the pandemic. The contradictory findings may be due to the public orientation towards authoritarian culture and their preference for strongman rule in crisis management.Practical implicationsThe governments in South Asia may systematically use army and police forces to manage crises as people are more satisfied with their performance during COVID-19 management.Originality/valueThis is the first time data across South Asia have been collected and analyzed about crisis management. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Public Sector Management Emerald Publishing

Do governance capacity and legitimacy affect citizens' satisfaction with COVID-19 management? Some evidence from South Asia

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/do-governance-capacity-and-legitimacy-affect-citizens-satisfaction-iCcrzsDiwj
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0951-3558
DOI
10.1108/ijpsm-03-2022-0087
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Theoretically, both democ/ratic legitimacy and government capacity are necessary for successful crisis management, like the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors argue that there are important variations for pandemic management in the developed and democratic world. However, are these equally needed in the developing world where democracy and capacity are present in varying degrees and in some countries with a vast deficit? This article analyzes how legitimacy and capacity affect citizens' satisfaction with the pandemic management in South Asia.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on a survey of 3,423 randomly selected respondents from Facebook users in South Asia. The survey data are presented and discussed along with information derived from secondary sources to put the data in the broader context of the South Asian countries. The authors apply ordinary linear regression for statistical analysis.FindingsThe findings suggest that citizens are content with the performance of government institutions in COVID-19 management. They emphasize material well-being, such as relief provisions and financial incentives during the crisis period. They are, however, less concerned about the legitimacy dimension, although democracy in South Asia is flawed with excessive restrictions on public freedom during the pandemic. The contradictory findings may be due to the public orientation towards authoritarian culture and their preference for strongman rule in crisis management.Practical implicationsThe governments in South Asia may systematically use army and police forces to manage crises as people are more satisfied with their performance during COVID-19 management.Originality/valueThis is the first time data across South Asia have been collected and analyzed about crisis management.

Journal

International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 11, 2022

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Crisis management; Governance capacity; Governance legitimacy; South Asia

References

  • Healthcare crisis in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Al-Zaman, M.S.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems
    Ansell, C.; Sørensen, E.; Torfing, J.
  • Citizens' trust in public and political institutions in Nepal
    Askvik, S.; Jamil, I.; Dhakal, T.N.
  • Citizens' inflated perceptions of the extent of democracy in different African countries: are individuals' notions of the state an answer to the puzzle?
    Baniamin, H.M.
  • Linking trust, performance, and governance quality: what can explain the incongruity?
    Baniamin, H.M.
  • Mismatch between lower performance and higher trust in the civil service: can culture provide an explanation?
    Baniamin, H.M.; Jamil, I.; Askvik, S.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic: why are some countries coping more successfully than others?
    Baniamin, H.M.; Rahman, M.; Hasan, M.T.
  • Input and output legitimacy in interactive governance
    Boedeltje, M.; Cornips, J.
  • Public leadership in times of crisis: mission impossible?
    Boin, A.; Hart, P.
  • Hiding in plain sight: conceptualizing the creeping crisis
    Boin, A.; Ekengren, M.; Rhinard, M.
  • The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: some good news for democracy?
    Bol, D.; Giani, M.; Blais, A.; Loewen, P.J.
  • Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021
    Bollyky, T.J.; Hulland, E.N.; Barber, R.M.; Collins, J.K.; Kiernan, S.; Moses, M.
  • East Asia remains different: a comment on the index of “self-expression values,” by Inglehart and Welzel
    Bomhoff, E.J.; Gu, M.M.-L.
  • The democracy barometers (Part I): authoritarian nostalgia in Asia
    Chang, Y.; Chu, Y.; Park, C.-M.
  • Balancing governance capacity and legitimacy: how the Norwegian government handled the COVID‐19 crisis as a high performer
    Christensen, T.; Lægreid, P.
  • The coronavirus crisis—crisis communication, meaning-making, and reputation management
    Christensen, T.; Lægreid, P.
  • Organizing for crisis management: building governance capacity and legitimacy
    Christensen, T.; Lægreid, P.; Rykkja, L.H.
  • Democratic discontent in old and new democracies: assessing the importance of democratic input and governmental output
    Dahlberg, S.; Linde, J.; Holmberg, S.
  • Coronavirus in Bangladesh: how can religion help? | Asia| An in-depth look at news from across the continent | DW | 23.10.2020
  • How Bhutan wrote its coronavirus success story | Asia| an in-depth look at news from across the continent | DW | 10.06.2020
  • How denial and conspiracy theories fuel coronavirus crisis in Pakistan | Asia| an in-depth look at news from across the continent | DW | 23.06.2020
  • A re-assessment of the concept of political support
    Easton, D.
  • Coronavirus | India becomes first country in the world to report over 4 lakh new cases on April 30, 2021
  • Asia barometer working paper series
    Nathan, A.J.
  • Authoritarian durability: public opinion towards democracy in Southeast Asia
    Pietsch, J.
  • What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions
    Rothstein, B.; Teorell, J.
  • Public health preparedness and responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in South Asia: a situation and policy analysis
    Sarkar, A.; Guangqi, L.; Yinzi, J.; Zheng; Zhi-Jie, Z.
  • Economic integration, democracy and the welfare state
    Scharpf, F.W.
  • Hindu group offers cow urine in a bid to ward off coronavirus | Reuters
    Siddiqui, D.
  • Covid-19 In South Asia: mirror and catalyst
    Stone, R.
  • Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches
    Suchman, M.C.
  • Coronavirus update (live), May 15
    Worldometer
  • Culture is destiny: a conversation with Lee Kuan Yew
    Zakaria, F.; Yew, L.K.
  • The digital divide in rural South Asia: survey evidence from Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka
    Zhou, Y.; Singh, N.; Kaushik, P.D.