Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Do corporate governance codes improve board accountability? Evidence from an emerging economy

Do corporate governance codes improve board accountability? Evidence from an emerging economy Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine whether the expectations and requirements contained within the corporate governance code have an impact on how accountability is perceived, understood and practiced by company board members in an emerging economy (Mauritius). Design/methodology/approach – The paper relies on 24 semi‐structured interviews of board members in listed and non‐listed companies and also analyses the accountability implications present in the local code of corporate governance and relevant reports. The analysis is informed by the typologies of board accountability and process developed by Roberts in 2001 (socialising, individualising, sovereign and complementary) and is complemented by Pettigrew and McNulty's 1995 notions of minimalist and maximalist boards. Findings – From a state which can largely be associated to the notion of sovereign governance and a minimalist board, the findings reveal a substantive change in the type of board accountability but it is one which privileges an individualising form of board interactions. A move to a more empowered “maximalist” board is also noted. Notwithstanding, the paper uncovers specific issues with the INED as an accountability mechanism in that there is much fuzziness on his/her role and motivations and whether INEDs can conceivably contribute to a socialising form of board accountability. Originality/value – The paper responds to calls for more qualitative research on how boards actually operate in emerging economies, at a time when an increasing number of countries have adopted corporate governance requirements drawn primarily from the Anglo‐American model. This paper contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on corporate board processes and dynamics in non‐Western contexts. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management Emerald Publishing

Do corporate governance codes improve board accountability? Evidence from an emerging economy

Download PDF
26 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/do-corporate-governance-codes-improve-board-accountability-evidence-HOOe5bIFCB
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1176-6093
DOI
10.1108/11766091211282661
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine whether the expectations and requirements contained within the corporate governance code have an impact on how accountability is perceived, understood and practiced by company board members in an emerging economy (Mauritius). Design/methodology/approach – The paper relies on 24 semi‐structured interviews of board members in listed and non‐listed companies and also analyses the accountability implications present in the local code of corporate governance and relevant reports. The analysis is informed by the typologies of board accountability and process developed by Roberts in 2001 (socialising, individualising, sovereign and complementary) and is complemented by Pettigrew and McNulty's 1995 notions of minimalist and maximalist boards. Findings – From a state which can largely be associated to the notion of sovereign governance and a minimalist board, the findings reveal a substantive change in the type of board accountability but it is one which privileges an individualising form of board interactions. A move to a more empowered “maximalist” board is also noted. Notwithstanding, the paper uncovers specific issues with the INED as an accountability mechanism in that there is much fuzziness on his/her role and motivations and whether INEDs can conceivably contribute to a socialising form of board accountability. Originality/value – The paper responds to calls for more qualitative research on how boards actually operate in emerging economies, at a time when an increasing number of countries have adopted corporate governance requirements drawn primarily from the Anglo‐American model. This paper contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on corporate board processes and dynamics in non‐Western contexts.

Journal

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 16, 2012

Keywords: Corporate governance; Accountability; Emerging economies; Emerging markets; Mauritius

References

  • The influence of social and political relations on corporate governance systems: the case of rural banks in Ghana
    Adu‐Amoah, A.; Tsamenyi, M.; Mensah‐Onumah, J.
  • Corporate governance in infancy and growth: an interview‐based study of the development of governance and corporate regulation in Nigeria
    Angaye, P.E.G.; Gwilliam, D.
  • Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies
    Barako, D.G.; Hancock, P.; Izan, H.Y.
  • Strengthening the financial reporting system: can audit committees deliver?
    Bedard, J.; Gendron, Y.
  • Do better‐governed Australian firms make more informative disclosures?
    Beekes, W.; Brown, P.
  • Coalitions, capitalists, and credibility: overcoming the crisis of confidence at Independence in Mauritius
    Brautigam, D.; Diolle, T.
  • Boards of directors and firm performance: is there an expectations gap?
    Brennan, N.
  • Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview
    Brennan, N.; Solomon, J.
  • Corporate governance – a multi‐theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations
    Christopher, J.
  • Corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting
    Cohen, J.; Krishnamurthy, G.; Wright, A.M.
  • Corporate governance: decades of dialogue and data
    Daily, C.M.; Dalton, D.R.; Cannella, A.A.
  • Empirical evidence on corporate governance and corporate performance in Tunisia
    El‐Mehdi, I.K.
  • Discipline and Punish
    Foucault, M.
  • Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), Corporate Governance Country Assessment for Mauritius
    Fremond, O.; Gorlick, W.
  • Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO‐board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures
    Gulati, R.; Westphal, J.D.
  • Beyond self‐interest: agency theory and the board in a satisficing world
    Hendry, J.
  • Accountability and creating accountability: a framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance
    Huse, M.
  • Model Corporate Governance and Conduct Code for Directors of Private Sector Companies
    Joint Economic Council
  • King Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa
    King
  • The implementation of corporate governance principles in an emerging economy: a critique of the situation in Cyprus
    Krambia‐Kapardis, M.; Psaros, J.
  • A model of financial accountability and the Church of England
    Laughlin, R.
  • Corporate governance: paradigms, dilemmas and beyond
    Letza, S.; Sun, X.
  • A Study of the Implementation and Impact of Corporate Governance in Mauritius
    Mahadeo, J.D.; Soobaroyen, T.
  • Board composition and financial performance: uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy
    Mahadeo, J.D.; Oogarah‐Hanuman, V.; Soobaroyen, T.
  • The case study, the interview and the issues: a personal reflection
    Marginson, D.E.W.
  • The limits of accountability
    Messner, M.
  • Power and Accountability in the Boardroom
    Monks, R.; Minow, N.
  • Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing
    Munro, R.; Mouritsen, J.
  • Report and Code on Corporate Governance for Mauritius
    National Committee on Corporate Governance (NCCG)
  • Voluntary corporate governance disclosures by post‐apartheid South African corporations
    Ntim, C.G.; Opong, K.K.; Danbolt, J.; Thomas, D.M.
  • OECD Principles of Corporate Governance
    Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)
  • Corporate governance codes: a comparison between Malaysia and the UK
    Ow‐Yong, K.; Guan, C.K.
  • Power and influence in and around the boardroom
    Pettigrew, A.; McNulty, T.
  • Cultural impact on Chinese corporate disclosure: a corporate governance perspective
    Qu, W.; Leung, P.
  • Critical accounting research in Africa: whence and whither
    Rahaman, A.S.
  • Interviews
    Rapley, T.
  • The influence of ownership structures and board practices on corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh
    Rashid, A.; Lodh, S.C.
  • Trust and control in Anglo‐American systems of corporate governance: the individualising and socializing effects of processes of accountability
    Roberts, J.
  • Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non‐executive director: creating accountability in the boardroom
    Roberts, J.; McNulty, T.; Stiles, P.
  • Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa
    Rossouw, G.J.
  • Modern Mauritius: The Politics of Decolonization
    Simmons, A.S.
  • The chameleon of accountability: forms and discourses
    Sinclair, A.
  • Selective compliance with the corporate governance code in Mauritius: is legitimacy theory at work?
    Soobaroyen, T.; Mahadeo, J.D.
  • A case study on the influence of corporate governance beyond the boardroom: perceptions from business unit managers
    Soobaroyen, T.; Sheik‐Ellahi, A.
  • Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance
    Sundaramurthy, C.; Lewis, M.
  • Introduction to corporate governance in less developed and emerging economies
    Tsamenyi, M.; Uddin, S.
  • Disclosure and corporate governance in developing countries: evidence from Ghana
    Tsamenyi, M.; Enninful‐Adu, E.; Onumah, J.
  • Rationality, traditionalism and the state of corporate governance mechanisms: illustrations from a less‐developed country
    Uddin, S.; Choudhury, J.
  • Frameworks underpinning corporate governance: evidence on Ugandan perceptions
    Wanyama, S.; Burton, B.; Helliar, C.