Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Distributed pool mining and digital inequalities, From cryptocurrency to scientific research

Distributed pool mining and digital inequalities, From cryptocurrency to scientific research This paper aims to look at shifts in internet-related content and services economies, from audience labour economies to Web 2.0 user-generated content, and the emerging model of user computing power utilisation, powered by blockchain technologies. The authors look at and test three models of user computing power utilisation based on distributed computing (Coinhive, Cryptotab and Gridcoin) two of which use cryptocurrency mining through distributed pool mining techniques, while the third is based on distributed computing of calculations for scientific research. The three models promise benefits to their users, which the authors discuss throughout the paper, studying how they interplay with the three levels of the digital divide.Design/methodology/approachThe goal of this article is twofold as follows: first to discuss how using the mining hype may reduce digital inequalities, and secondly to demonstrate how these services offer a new business model based on value rewarding in exchange for computational power, which would allow more online opportunities for people, and thus reduce digital inequalities. Finally, this contribution discusses and proposes a method for a fair revenue model for content and online service providers that uses user device computing resources or computational power, rather than their data and attention. The method is represented by a model that allows for consensual use of user computing resources in exchange for accessing content and using software tools and services, acting essentially as an alternative online business model.FindingsAllowing users to convert their devices’ computational power into value, whether through access to services or content or receiving cryptocurrency and payments in return for providing services or content or direct computational powers, contributes to bridging digital divides, even at fairly small levels. Secondly, the advent of blockchain technologies is shifting power relations between end-users and content developers and service providers and is a necessity for the decentralisation of internet and internet services.Originality/valueThe article studies the effect of services that rely on distributed computing and mining on digital inequalities, by looking at three different case studies – Coinhive, Gridcoin and Cryptotab – that promise to provide value in return for using computing resources. The article discusses how these services may reduce digital inequalities by affecting the three levels of the digital divide, namely, access to information and communication technologies (ICTs) (first level), skills and motivations in using ICTs (second level) and capacities in using ICTs to get concrete benefits (third level). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society Emerald Publishing

Distributed pool mining and digital inequalities, From cryptocurrency to scientific research

Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/distributed-pool-mining-and-digital-inequalities-from-cryptocurrency-grJ2Gtlpwy
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1477-996X
DOI
10.1108/jices-02-2020-0018
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper aims to look at shifts in internet-related content and services economies, from audience labour economies to Web 2.0 user-generated content, and the emerging model of user computing power utilisation, powered by blockchain technologies. The authors look at and test three models of user computing power utilisation based on distributed computing (Coinhive, Cryptotab and Gridcoin) two of which use cryptocurrency mining through distributed pool mining techniques, while the third is based on distributed computing of calculations for scientific research. The three models promise benefits to their users, which the authors discuss throughout the paper, studying how they interplay with the three levels of the digital divide.Design/methodology/approachThe goal of this article is twofold as follows: first to discuss how using the mining hype may reduce digital inequalities, and secondly to demonstrate how these services offer a new business model based on value rewarding in exchange for computational power, which would allow more online opportunities for people, and thus reduce digital inequalities. Finally, this contribution discusses and proposes a method for a fair revenue model for content and online service providers that uses user device computing resources or computational power, rather than their data and attention. The method is represented by a model that allows for consensual use of user computing resources in exchange for accessing content and using software tools and services, acting essentially as an alternative online business model.FindingsAllowing users to convert their devices’ computational power into value, whether through access to services or content or receiving cryptocurrency and payments in return for providing services or content or direct computational powers, contributes to bridging digital divides, even at fairly small levels. Secondly, the advent of blockchain technologies is shifting power relations between end-users and content developers and service providers and is a necessity for the decentralisation of internet and internet services.Originality/valueThe article studies the effect of services that rely on distributed computing and mining on digital inequalities, by looking at three different case studies – Coinhive, Gridcoin and Cryptotab – that promise to provide value in return for using computing resources. The article discusses how these services may reduce digital inequalities by affecting the three levels of the digital divide, namely, access to information and communication technologies (ICTs) (first level), skills and motivations in using ICTs (second level) and capacities in using ICTs to get concrete benefits (third level).

Journal

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 4, 2020

Keywords: Digital divide(s); Blockchain; Digital inequalities

References

  • Exploitation in the data mine
    Andrejevic, M.; Fuchs, C.
  • Proof of activity: extending bitcoin’s proof of work via proof of stake [extended abstract]
    Bentov, I.; Lee, C.; Mizrahi, A.; Rosenfeld, M.
  • Three challenges for the web, according to its inventor
    Berners-Lee, T.
  • The attention economy: measuring the value of free digital services on the internet
    Brynjolfsson, E.; Oh, J.
  • You could be mine(d): the rise of cryptojacking
    Carlin, D.; Burgess, J.; O’Kane, P.; Sezer, S.
  • Firefox working on protection against in-browser cryptojacking scripts
    Cimpanu, C.
  • Privacy issues in mobile advertising, international review of law
    Cleff, E.B.
  • Web 2.0: conceptual foundations and marketing issues
    Constantinides, E.; Fountain, S.J.
  • From the ‘digital divide’ to digital inequality’: studying internet use as penetration increases
    DiMaggio, P.; Hargittai, E.
  • A first look at browser-based cryptojacking
    Eskandari, S.; Leoutsarakos, A.; Mursch, T.; Clark, J.
  • Your torrent client may be mining bitcoin without telling you
    Estes, A.C.
  • App developer settles FTC and New jersey charges it hijacked consumers’ phones to mine cryptocurrency
  • A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion
    Helsper, E.
  • Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media
    Kaplan, A.; Haenlein, M.
  • A new dimension of the digital divide: exploring the relationship between broadband connection, smartphone use and communication competence
    Lee, H.; Park, N.; Hwang, Y.
  • Upcoming firefox update blocks in-browser cryptojackers
    Lestoc, C.
  • From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge societies
    Mansell, R.
  • On the transactional ecosystems of digital media
    Manzerolle, V.; Wiseman, A.
  • Your browser could be mining cryptocurrency for a stranger
    Newman, L.
  • Legal and ethical challenges of online behavioral targeting in advertising
    Nill, A.; Aalberts, R.J.
  • The business of news in the attention economy: audience labor and MediaNews group’s efforts to capitalize on news consumption
    Nixon, B.
  • What is web 2.0
    O’reilly, T.
  • Text advertising blindness: the new banner blindness?
    Owens, J.W.; Chaparro, B.S.; Palmer, E.M.
  • Digital divides from access to activities: comparing mobile and personal computer internet users
    Pearce, K.E.; Rice, R.E.
  • Social control and surveillance in the society of consumers
    Ragnedda, M.
  • Digital capital
    Ragnedda, M.; Ruiu, M.L.
  • Measuring digital capital: an empirical investigation
    Ragnedda, M.; Ruiu, M.L.; Addeo, F.
  • Consumer strategies for the internet: four scenarios
    Randall, D.
  • Salon.com | news, politics, business, technology and culture main page
  • Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide
    Selwyn, N.
  • Internet security threat report
  • The third level digital divide: who benefits most from being online
    van Deursen, A.J.A.M.; Helsper, E.J.; Robinson, L.; Cotten, S.R.; Schulz, J.
  • The digital divide shifts to differences in usage
    van Deursen, A.; van Dijk, J.
  • Toward a multifaceted model of internet access for understanding digital divides: an empirical investigation
    van Deursen, A.; van Dijk, J.
  • On legitimate mining of cryptocurrency in the browser – a feasibility study
    Venskutonis, S,; Collison, M.
  • Assessing the regional digital divide across the European union-27
    Vicente, M.R.; López, A.J.
  • Strategic development of business models: implications of the web 2.0 for creating value on the internet, long range planning
    Wirtz, B.W.; Schilke, O.; Ullrich, S.
  • The relationship between advertising and content provision on the internet
    Yuan, Y.; Roehrig, S.; Caulkins, J.P.