Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
UNESCO (2000)
Report of the rapporteur of the twenty-fourth extraordinary session of the Bureau, Cairns, Australia (23-24 November 2000), world heritage Committee, WHC-2000/CONF.204/4
UNESCO (1994)
Report on the expert meeting on heritage Canals (Canada, September 1994)
UNESCO (2013)
Decisions adopted by the world heritage committee at its 37th session (Phnom Penh)
UNESCO (2017)
Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention
UNESCO (2015)
Global strategy for a representative, balanced and credible world heritage list: report on the follow-up to resolution 19 GA 9
ICMM (2003)
Mining and protected areas position statement
ICOMOS IUCN (2015)
Connecting practice
Natural resource extraction is perceived as a destructive aspect of human culture. This characterization is widespread, despite the activity having shaped relationships between communities and their environment to create entire sets of cultural values and expressions through settlement patterns, traditional skills and practices, innovation and technology, intangible cultural expressions, local economies and more. The cultural dimensions of natural resource extraction landscapes were discussed at the ICOMOS ADCOM Annual Symposium in La Plata, Argentina, in December 2018. The workshop included experts in cultural landscapes, sustainability, industrial archaeology and industrial heritage. This paper reports on these issues and deliberations focusing on World Heritage cultural landscapes of extraction.Design/methodology/approachThe report considers a broad survey of the World Heritage List and sites on national Tentative Lists to identify those related to natural extraction sites and distinguishing between categories of relict vs. living, and between the types of natural resources being extracted.FindingsThe conclusion is that the World Heritage Committee has yet to address the living value of natural resource extraction. Furthermore, the workshop attendants concluded that there is a pressing need to do so in light of the type, nature and sustainability of these sites. As the source of materials for many outstanding sites on the World Heritage List and the decreasing availability of some resources, the question requires consideration to ensure the sustainable use and livelihood of communities.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitations are set by the general terms of the survey and the limited engagement of knowledgeable individuals.Practical implicationsThe practical implications are related to guidance to review and analyse potential living cultural landscapes related to natural resource extraction.Originality/valueThere is no general discussion on this topic yet amongst professionals. The initiative of the workshop identified that gap and its related necessity to provide guidance.
Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 14, 2021
Keywords: Sustainability; Cultural landscapes; Cultural heritage; World heritage
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.