Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Dutta, M. Crossan (2005)
The Nature of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Understanding the Process Using the 4I Organizational Learning FrameworkEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29
C. Cantù (2010)
Exploring the role of spatial relationships to transform knowledge in a business idea - Beyond a geographic proximityIndustrial Marketing Management, 39
R. Suddaby (2014)
Editor's Comments: Why Theory?Academy of Management Review, 39
Philip Mirvis, B. Googins, Sylvia Kinnicutt (2010)
Vision, mission, values: Guideposts to sustainabilityOrganizational Dynamics, 39
A. Amin, F. Wilkinson (1999)
Learning, proximity and industrial performance: an introductionCambridge Journal of Economics, 23
E. Maine, P. Soh, N. Santos (2015)
The role of entrepreneurial decision-making in opportunity creation and recognitionTechnovation, 39
J. Eckhardt, S. Shane (2003)
Opportunities and EntrepreneurshipJournal of Management, 29
(2006)
Embedding and utilizing low weight: value creation and resource configurations in the networks around IKEA’s Lack table and Holmen’s newsprint
An International Journal, 18
J. Dahlqvist, Johan Wiklund (2012)
Measuring the market newness of new venturesJournal of Business Venturing, 27
The IMP Journal, 8
I. Zander (2004)
The microfoundations of cluster stickiness--walking in the shoes of the entrepreneurJournal of International Management, 10
Elena Salinetti (2013)
New business formation in business networks
S. Venkataraman (1997)
The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor''s perspective
Strategic Management Journal, 22
H. Lundberg, Edith Andrésen (2012)
Cooperation among companies, universities and local government in a Swedish contextIndustrial Marketing Management, 41
T. Baker, R. Nelson (2005)
Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial BricolageAdministrative Science Quarterly, 50
D. Shepherd (2015)
Party On! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial
R. Boschma (2005)
Proximity and Innovation: A Critical AssessmentRegional Studies, 39
Janine Nahapiet, S. Ghoshal (1998)
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational AdvantageAcademy of Management Review, 23
K. Eisenhardt, Melissa Graebner (2007)
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And ChallengesAcademy of Management Journal, 50
Lise Aaboen, A. Dubois, F. Lind (2011)
Start-ups starting up - Firms looking for a networkThe iMP Journal, 5
Ha Hoang, B. Antoncic (2003)
Network-based research in entrepreneurship A critical reviewJournal of Business Venturing, 18
S. Nambisan, R. Baron (2013)
Entrepreneurship in Innovation Ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ Self–Regulatory Processes and Their Implications for New Venture SuccessEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37
Mark Granovetter (1985)
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of EmbeddednessAmerican Journal of Sociology, 91
H. Håkansson, D. Ford, Lars-Erik Gadde, I. Snehota, Alexandra Waluszewski (2010)
Business Networks
G. Easton, D. Harrison (2004)
Temporally embedded case comparison in industrial marketing research
R. Capello, A. Faggian (2005)
Collective Learning and Relational Capital in Local Innovation ProcessesRegional Studies, 39
H. Håkansson, I. Snehota (1995)
Developing relationships in business networks
Ivan Vaghely, P. Julien (2010)
Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identificationJournal of Business Venturing, 25
Ron Adner, R. Kapoor (2009)
Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology GenerationsStrategy & Economics
Marko Kohtamäki, Jukka Vesalainen, Elina Varamäki, Tero Vuorinen (2006)
The governance of partnerships and a strategic network: Supplier actors' experiences in the governance by the customersManagement Decision, 44
Lise Aaboen, J. Laage-Hellman, F. Lind, Christina Öberg, Tommy Shih (2016)
Exploring the roles of university spin-offs in business networksIndustrial Marketing Management, 59
(2014)
Why Theory? Acad
Strategic Management Journal, 31
Andrea Caragliu, P. Nijkamp (2012)
The impact of regional absorptive capacity on spatial knowledge spillovers: the Cohen and Levinthal model revisitedApplied Economics, 44
A. Torre, Alain Rallet (2005)
Proximity and LocalizationRegional Studies, 39
Pinar Ozcan, K. Eisenhardt (2009)
Origin of Alliance Portfolios: Entrepreneurs, Network Strategies, and Firm PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 52
(2012)
Entrepreneurial networking in INV’s opportunity development
Ha Hoang, An Yi (2015)
Network-based Research in Entrepreneurship: A Decade in Review
Ron Adner (2006)
Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem.Harvard business review, 84 4
P. Reynolds (2005)
Understanding Business Creation: Serendipity and Scope in Two Decades of Business Creation StudiesSmall Business Economics, 24
Roberto Basile, R. Capello, Andrea Caragliu (2012)
Technological interdependence and regional growth in Europe: Proximity and synergy in knowledge spillovers, 91
S. Shane, S. Venkataraman (2000)
The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 25
M. Beverland, A. Lindgreen (2010)
What makes a good case study? A positivist review of qualitative case research published in Industrial Marketing Management, 1971–2006Industrial Marketing Management, 39
Christine Tamásy (2006)
Determinants of regional entrepreneurship dynamics in contemporary Germany: A conceptual and empirical analysisRegional Studies, 40
S. Alvarez, J. Barney (2007)
Discovery and Creation: Alternative Theories of Entrepreneurial ActionRevista Organizações em Contexto, 3
Francesco Ciabuschi, Andrea Perna, I. Snehota (2012)
Assembling resources when forming a new businessJournal of Business Research, 65
A. Fayolle, Sarah Jack, Wadid Lamine, Didier Chabaud (2016)
Entrepreneurial Process and Social Networks
O. Sorenson, Pino Audia (2000)
The Social Structure of Entrepreneurial Activity: Geographic Concentration of Footwear Production in the United States, 1940–19891American Journal of Sociology, 106
Wenpin Tsai, S. Ghoshal (1998)
Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm NetworksAcademy of Management Journal, 41
Lise Aaboen, A. Dubois, F. Lind (2013)
Strategizing as networking for new venturesIndustrial Marketing Management, 42
D. Fletcher (2006)
Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunityEntrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18
D. Hambrick, Ming-Jer Chen (2008)
New Academic Fields as Admittance-Seeking Social Movements: The Case of Strategic ManagementAcademy of Management Review, 33
H. Aldrich, C. Zimmer (1986)
Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks
S. Birley (1985)
The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial ProcessJournal of Business Venturing, 1
R. Piekkari, Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, Catherine Welch (2010)
‘Good’ case research in industrial marketing: Insights from research practiceIndustrial Marketing Management, 39
T. Järvensivu, Jan-Åke Törnroos (2010)
Case study research with moderate constructionism: Conceptualization and practical illustrationIndustrial Marketing Management, 39
W. Powell, K. Koput, Laurel Smith‐Doerr (1996)
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.Administrative Science Quarterly, 41
Alexandre Ardichvili, Richard Cardozo, Souray Ray (2003)
A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and developmentJournal of Business Venturing, 18
T. Mainela, Elina Pernu, Vesa Puhakka (2011)
The Development of a High-Tech International New Venture as a Process of Acting: A Study of the Lifespan of a Venture in Software BusinessJournal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18
A. Rocca, Andrea Perna (2014)
New venture acquiring position in an existing network. The case of DR Motor Company.The iMP Journal, 2
Sara Øiestad, Markus Bugge (2014)
Digitisation of publishing: : Exploration based on existing business modelsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 83
Helena Yli-Renko, E. Autio, H. Sapienza (2001)
SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMSSouthern Medical Journal, 22
Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 30
L. Schjoedt, Erik Monsen, Allison Pearson, Tim Barnett, James Chrisman (2013)
New Venture and Family Business Teams: Understanding Team Formation, Composition, Behaviors, and PerformanceEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37
Michael Brennan, P. McGowan (2006)
Academic Entrepreneurship: A Case StudyInternational Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 12
Lise Aaboen, A. Rocca, F. Lind, Andrea Perna, Tommy Shih (2017)
Starting up in business networks
A. Dubois, Lars-Erik Gadde (2002)
Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case researchJournal of Business Research, 55
T. Kostova, Kendall Roth (2003)
Social Capital in Multinational Corporations and a Micro-Macro Model of its FormationAcademy of Management Review, 28
A. Kauppinen, Vesa Puhakka (2010)
ENTREPRENEURIAL ARCHETYPES IN MAKING SENSE OF THE STRUCTURAL HOLES (SUMMARY)Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 30
James Moore (1996)
The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems
M. Barratt, Thomas Choi, Mei-Lien Li (2011)
Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implicationsJournal of Operations Management, 29
Sarah Jack (2010)
Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomesJournal of Business Venturing, 25
A. Rocca, I. Snehota (2014)
Relating in business networks: Innovation in practiceIndustrial Marketing Management, 43
S. Sarasvathy, Nicholas Dew, S. Velamuri, S. Venkataraman (2003)
Three Views of Entrepreneurial Opportunity
Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1
Even if in a traditional perspective the discovery and the exploitation of opportunities are associated to the entrepreneur’s capabilities, a relational perspective is required to better analyze the phenomenon of starting up a new venture. The growing attention to interaction with the external environment has been emerging as a precondition of the entrepreneurial processes as it creates the knowledge and the experience necessary to perceive the opportunity. The entrepreneurial opportunities are created through joint acts with others through social relationships. Shifting the attention from social to business relationships, the main aim of this paper is to investigate the discovery and the exploitation of collective entrepreneurial opportunities in starting up new business. In particular, the purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of relational proximity in the entrepreneurial journey considered as an emergent process of transforming potentiality into actuality.Design/methodology/approachThe paper applied a qualitative methodology (Dubois and Araujo, 2004) and a case study approach (Barrat et al., 2011). The case concerns the dyadic spin-off relationship between the innovative start up, ShapeMode (the generated firm), and the Milan FabLab (the generating firm) located in Lombardy Region (Italy).FindingsThe emerging of collective entrepreneurial opportunities could be analyzed at two levels: the first one concerns the dyadic spin-off relationship, while the second one is founded on the business relationships that the start-up can activate with the business partners of the generating firm. The collective entrepreneurial opportunities are positive influenced by jointness of the actors and their co-evolution, founded on the shared values and goals.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough the case study approach allowed the researcher to gain detailed information about the spin-off relationship, this effort does not measure the performance outcomes of the relationships and actions that were taken to improve the competitiveness of the start-up. Future studies would benefit from a large-scale questionnaire given to the members of the start-up and to the actors of its Entrepreneurial Network, so to analyze all of its performance implications for the start-up and the network as a whole. In addition, it could be of interest for future research to investigate the effects of collective entrepreneurial opportunities in order to examine this topic more deeply.Practical implicationsFrom a managerial point of view, even if the growing number of start-ups has been associated to a temporary phenomenon, the development of new ventures is now consolidated. A new managerial approach is required to promote the birth and the growth of the start-ups. The development of a new venture requires to shift the attention from the collection of financial resources to the exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities generated by interconnected business relationships. In this way a relevant attention should be recognized to the new role of organizations that can be considered as facilitators of business relationships, such as the FabLab. This paper sheds light on the relevance of the strategic networking that sustains the generation of collective entrepreneurial opportunities. The networking involves actors that belong to different geographic area and different countries but that are focused on the same business dream related to the exploitation of potentialities of digital fabrication. The policymakers should recognize the role of the FabLab as facilitator of knowledge diffusion concerning digital fabrication.Originality/valueThe entrepreneurial opportunities such as the starting up of a new business and its evolution, are enacted, discovered and exploited through interconnected business relationships. In particular the main entrepreneurial opportunities are generated by the activation of business relationships with new business actors. Focusing on the dyadic spin-off relationship, the exploitation of collective entrepreneurial opportunities depends on the sharing of third actors. The business partners of the generating actor (FabLab) became business partners of the generated actor (start-up). The evolution of the generating firm (FabLab) influenced the birth and the evolution of the generated firms (start-up). The dyadic relationship allows the generated firm to discover entrepreneurial opportunities and to exploit them, accessing to the business partners of the generating firm. The effectiveness of the spin-off relationship sustains the replication of the model of new firm generation, that could benefit from the relationships of the two actors of the dyad. Moreover the strong relationships are founded on relational proximity that is characterized by the sharing of values, vision and business dreams.
IMP Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 13, 2018
Keywords: Relational proximity; Collective entrepreneurial opportunities; Digital fabrication; Entrepreneurial network; Spatial relationships
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.