Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Lilja, Daniel Richardsson (2012)
Putting Appreciative Design into Practice : A Case Study of a Course Evaluation and Design Process
Megan Tschannen-Moran, Bob Tschannen‐Moran (2011)
Taking a Strengths-Based Focus Improves School ClimateJournal of School Leadership, 21
H. Dumont, D. Istance, F. Benavides (2010)
The nature of learning: using research to inspire practice
U. Bergmark, C. Kostenius (2018)
Appreciative student voice model – reflecting on an appreciative inquiry research method for facilitating student voice processesReflective Practice, 19
(2008)
Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning
(2020)
Advice and guidance: learning and teaching
M. Healey, A. Flint, Katherine Harrington (2016)
Students as Partners: Reflections on a Conceptual ModelTeaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 4
David Cooperrider, D. Whitney (2005)
Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change
T. McMahon (2005)
STUDENT-CENTRED LEARNING: WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR STUDENTS AND LECTURERS?
Linus Dietz (2016)
The Nature of Learning
C. Bovill, G. Aitken, J. Hutchison, F. Morrison, K. Roseweir, Alison Scott, Soleye Sotannde (2010)
Experiences of learning through collaborative evaluation from a masters programme in professional educationInternational Journal for Academic Development, 15
Susan Deeley (2014)
Summative co-assessment: A deep learning approach to enhancing employability skills and attributesActive Learning in Higher Education, 15
S. Robinson, Helle Neergaard, Lene Tanggaard, N. Krueger (2016)
New Horizons in Entrepreneurship: From Teacher-Led to Student-Centered Learning.Journal of Education and Training, 58
Tanya Lubicz-Nawrocka (2018)
Students as partners in learning and teaching: The benefits of co-creation of the curriculum, 2
F. Duah, T. Croft (2011)
Students as partners in mathematics design
Bruce Barnett, Gary O’Mahony (2006)
Developing a culture of reflection: implications for school improvementReflective Practice, 7
Canadian Journal of Education, 34
C. Bovill, A. Cook‐Sather, P. Felten (2011)
Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developersInternational Journal for Academic Development, 16
T. Ghaye, Anita Melander-Wikman, M. Kisare, Philip Chambers, U. Bergmark, C. Kostenius, S. Lillyman (2008)
Participatory and appreciative action and reflection (PAAR) – democratizing reflective practicesReflective Practice, 9
J. Kane, Gwynedd Lloyd, G. McCluskey, S. Riddell, J. Stead, Elisabet Weedon (2008)
Collaborative evaluation: balancing rigour and relevance in a research study of restorative approaches in schools in ScotlandInternational Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31
C. Bovill (2014)
An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USAInnovations in Education and Teaching International, 51
Unlike common evaluation procedures where students are only used to gather information without being involved in the utilisation of the information, the procedure applied in this study involved students in the process of implementing the gathered information in the improvement of learning and the development of a student-centred learning resource. This study aims to improve learning by involving students in the improvement process through appreciative inquiry (AI) and give students a different teaching method.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, AI was used to identify the best of an existing learning resource; co-envisioning the possibilities that can improve the learning resource and co-constructing the possibilities along with the students that will benefit from the improved learning resource.FindingsThrough the five phases of AI, students generated ideas for improving the learning resource and the ideas were implemented in creating an improved learning resource. The improved learning resource was evaluated by other students that did not participate in creating the improved learning resource. Majority of the students said the improved learning resource was more impactful on their learning, better than the original learning resource.Originality/valueAI has hitherto been mostly focussed on other aspects of teaching and learning than aspects that require subject knowledge such as the development of teaching and learning resources. Hence, in this study, students were engaged as co-creators in developing a student-centred self-learning study manual.
International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 7, 2023
Keywords: Improve learning; Evaluation procedures; Learning resource; Appreciative inquiry; Co-envisioning; Co-constructing; Self-learning study manual
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.