Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Hazreena Hussein (2011)
Qualitative Research MethodsResearch Design in Clinical Psychology
D. Bawden (2001)
Information and digital literacies: a review of conceptsJ. Documentation, 57
Nicky Agate (2018)
Empowerment, Experimentation, Engagement: Embracing Partnership Models in LibrariesThe Idealis
Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13
T. Mackey, Trudi Jacobson (2011)
Reframing Information Literacy as a MetaliteracyColl. Res. Libr., 72
J. Ivey (2011)
Focus groups.Pediatric nursing, 37 5
Teresa Dobson, J. Willinsky (2007)
Digital Literacy
Jesse Sparks, Irvin Katz, Penny Beile (2016)
Assessing Digital Information Literacy in Higher Education: A Review of Existing Frameworks and Assessments with Recommendations for Next-Generation Assessment. Research Report. ETS RR-16-32.ETS Research Report Series
R. Reynolds (2016)
Defining, designing for, and measuring “social constructivist digital literacy” development in learners: a proposed frameworkEducational Technology Research and Development, 64
A. Bryant, Kathy Charmaz (2007)
The sage handbook of grounded theory
Luci Pangrazio (2016)
Reconceptualising critical digital literacyDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37
Jl. of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia (2004) 13(1),93-106 Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era
S. Jaramillo (2017)
Adams Becker, S.; Cummins, M.; Davis, A.; Freeman, A.; Hall Giesinger, C.; Ananthanarayanan, V. NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium, 2017
R. Hall, Lucy Atkins, Josie Fraser (2014)
Defining a Self-Evaluation Digital Literacy Framework for Secondary Educators: The DigiLit Leicester Project.Research in Learning Technology, 22
PurposeInstitutions seeking to develop or expand digital literacy programs face the challenge of navigating varied definitions for digital literacy itself. In answer to this challenge, this paper aims to share a process for developing a shared framework for digital literacy at one institution, including drawing on themes in existing frameworks, soliciting campus feedback and making revisions.Design/methodology/approachA draft digital literacy framework was created following the work of an initial library task force. Focus groups were conducted to gather feedback on the framework and to identify areas for future development.FindingsFocus groups yielded 38 written responses. Feedback themes related to gaps in the framework, structural suggestions and common challenges for learners. Themes in focus group feedback led to several framework revisions, including the addition of Curation as a competency area, the removal of information communication technologies as its own competency area, and the inclusion of Learner rather than Student at the center of the framework.Practical implicationsThe approaches described in this case study can be adapted by those looking to create a shared framework or definition for digital literacy on their campuses, as well as to create or revise definitions for other related literacies.Originality/valueThis case study presents an adaptable process for getting started with broad digital literacy initiatives, within the context of existing digital literacy frameworks worldwide.
Reference Services Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 10, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.