Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Pinkau (1998)
Annual Report 1997
Deborah Garnick, Ann Hendricks, Catherine Comstock (1994)
Measuring quality of care: fundamental information from administrative datasets.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 6 2
U. Nabitz, W. Veldhuizen, Warlee T.
Improving Registration Processes
P. Aveyard (1997)
Monitoring the performance of general practices.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 3 4
Joint Commission
Codman: A Study in Hospital Efficiency
L.A. Norman
Computer‐assisted quality improvement in an ambulatory care setting
S.Q. van Es
Indicators in Health Care
W. Burrell, C. Wilson (1992)
Information Strategy Plan
U. Nabitz, P. Nanitsos, M. Wardi
The Profile Package
L. Norman, P. Hardin, E. Lester, S. Stinton, E. Vincent (1995)
Computer-assisted quality improvement in an ambulatory care setting: a follow-up report.The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 21 3
U. Nabitz
Documentation of the seminar: introduction to Profile Package
U. Nabitz
Research and development of an indicator system for addiction services
J. Sorensen, W. Żelman, G. Hanbery, A. Kucic (1987)
Managing mental health organizations with 25 key performance indicators.Evaluation and program planning, 10 3
P. Colson
Indicators for hospitals
Shaw Cd (1997)
Health-care league tables in the United Kingdom.Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice, 17
R. Turpin, L. Darcy, R. Koss, C. McMahill, K. Meyne, D. Morton, J. Rodríguez, S. Schmaltz, P. Schyve, P. Smith (1996)
A model to assess the usefulness of performance indicators.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 8 4
Maryland Indicator Project
Going interactive and international
V. Kazandjian, R. Thomson, W. Law, K. Waldron (1996)
Do performance indicators make a difference?The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 22 7
U. Nabitz, H. Tieken, W. Veldhuizen
The Profile Package in the New Organization
Joint Commission of Health‐care Accreditation (JHCA)
Primer on Indicator Development and Application
The objective of this project was to develop and implement an indicator system, which delivered concise, specific and relevant information for the managers of the treatment departments. The project was carried out in The Jellinek Center, a treatment service for addiction in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. During a period of ten years the indicator system called Profile Package was developed and implemented in all departments. The results of the project are: a system and an infrastructure for producing a Profile Package for each team every quarter. The departments use five critical indicators and each department has added about 40 indicators to meet their needs. On the basis of the indicators the performance of the team can be monitored. An annual reviewing cycle and goal-finding procedure is established, which stimulates a results-orientation. The trend of the five critical indicators over a number of years shows that the results of the departments, working with the system, are positive.
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2002
Keywords: Service control; Systems analysis; Research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.