Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Developing a risk/need assessment tool for women offenders: a gender-informed approach

Developing a risk/need assessment tool for women offenders: a gender-informed approach Recently, correctional agencies have argued that there are differences between factors influencing men and women’s involvement in the criminal justice system. The purpose of this paper is to examine the validity of a gender-informed risk/need assessment tool.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consisted of 620 women offenders admitted to federal Canadian custody, as well as a matched-comparison group of 647 men. Items were selected from routine assessments in an administrative database based on an extensive literature review of factors related to criminal risk for women.FindingsResults showed that the items included in this assessment and the overall rating of risk/need significantly predicted any return to custody for both women and men. As well, ratings incrementally predicted any return to custody over and above other established tools.Practical implicationsThe gender-informed risk/need assessment tool, informed by the literature, performed well for both men and women. The research highlights the complementary, not competing, perspectives of gender-neutral and gender-responsive risk and need factors.Originality/valueFactors commonly considered gender-salient predicted risk for men and women. The present study demonstrates that risk assessments tools for men and women should look beyond the factors routinely assessed in the research to identify novel dynamic factors that contribute to risk for men and women and could be targeted for intervention. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice Emerald Publishing

Developing a risk/need assessment tool for women offenders: a gender-informed approach

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/developing-a-risk-need-assessment-tool-for-women-offenders-a-gender-xxoeMHpY10
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2056-3841
DOI
10.1108/jcrpp-03-2019-0017
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Recently, correctional agencies have argued that there are differences between factors influencing men and women’s involvement in the criminal justice system. The purpose of this paper is to examine the validity of a gender-informed risk/need assessment tool.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consisted of 620 women offenders admitted to federal Canadian custody, as well as a matched-comparison group of 647 men. Items were selected from routine assessments in an administrative database based on an extensive literature review of factors related to criminal risk for women.FindingsResults showed that the items included in this assessment and the overall rating of risk/need significantly predicted any return to custody for both women and men. As well, ratings incrementally predicted any return to custody over and above other established tools.Practical implicationsThe gender-informed risk/need assessment tool, informed by the literature, performed well for both men and women. The research highlights the complementary, not competing, perspectives of gender-neutral and gender-responsive risk and need factors.Originality/valueFactors commonly considered gender-salient predicted risk for men and women. The present study demonstrates that risk assessments tools for men and women should look beyond the factors routinely assessed in the research to identify novel dynamic factors that contribute to risk for men and women and could be targeted for intervention.

Journal

Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 20, 2019

Keywords: Risk assessment; Risk; Scale validation; Women offenders; Gender-informed; Gender-responsive

References

  • Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the level of service/case management inventory
    Andrews, D.A.; Guzzo, L.; Raynor, P.; Rowe, R.C.; Rettinger, J.; Brews, A.; Wormith, J.S.
  • Initial results of the computerized mental health intake screening system (CoMHISS) for federally sentenced women
    Archambault, K.; Stewart, L.; Wilton, G.; Cousineau, C.
  • Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: do gender and socio-historical context matter?
    Bersani, B.E.; Laub, J.H.; Nieuwbeerta, P.
  • A review of the women offender risk/need research: in search of gender-neutral, women-salient and women-specific risk factors
    Brown, S.
  • The dynamic factor component of the offender intake and assessment process: a psychometric, meta analytic and field review
    Brown, S.L.; Motiuk, L.L.
  • Services to criminal justice agencies
  • Gender matters: an introduction to the special issues on women and girls
    de Vogel, V.; Nicholls, T.L.
  • Gender-sensitive violence risk assessment: predictive validity of six tools in female forensic psychiatric patients
    de Vogel, V.; Bruggeman, M.; Lancel, M.
  • Female additional manual (FAM): additional guidelines to the HCR-20V3 for assessing risk for violence in women
    de Vogel, V.; de Vries Robbé, M.; van Kalmthout, W.; Place, C.
  • Women’s pathways to crime: a heuristic typology of offenders
    Dehart, D.D.
  • Women offender assessment: can gender-informed variables improve risk prediction?
    Derkzen, D.; Wardrop, K.; Wanamaker, K.A.
  • Risk assessment instruments validated and implemented in correctional settings in the united states
    Desmarais, S.; Singh, J.
  • Needs and pretrial failure: additional risk factors for female and male pretrial defendants
    Gehring, K.S.; Van Voorhis, P.
  • The predictive validity of risk assessment tools for female offenders: a systematic review
    Geraghty, K.A.; Woodhams, J.
  • Releases of offenders classified as medium and maximum security
    Gobeil, R.; Cousineau, C.; Power, J.; Stewart, L.
  • Static factors assessment (SFA) in the offender intake assessment in the offender intake assessment process: relationship to release and community outcomes
    Helmus, L.; Forrester, T.K.
  • Incorporating strengths into quantitative assessments of criminal risk for adult offenders
    Jones, N.J.; Brown, S.L.; Robinson, D.; Frey, D.
  • Outcomes of trauma-informed interventions for incarcerated women: a review
    King, E.A.
  • An examination of the validity of accountability, motivation and engagement assessment
    Mathias, K.; Wormith, S.
  • Development and validation of a criminal risk index (CRI) for federally sentenced offenders in Canada
    Motiuk, L.; Vuong, B.
  • The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada: part 5 – how essential are gender-specific forensic psychiatric services?
    Nicholls, T.L.; Crocker, A.G.; Seto, M.C.; Wilson, C.; Charette, Y.; Côté, G.
  • An assessment of the women-centred training program
    Nolan, A.; Harris, A.; Derkzen, D.
  • Preparing women offenders for release
  • Predicting probation outcomes: factors associated with probation rearrest, revocations, and technical violations during supervision
    Olson, D.E.; Lurigio, A.J.
  • Service planning instrument for women (SPIn-W)
  • General risk and need, gender specificity, and the recidivism of female offenders
    Rettinger, L.J.; Andrews, D.A.
  • Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’S D, and R
    Rice, M.E.; Harris, G.T.
  • Gendered pathways: a quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration
    Salisbury, E.J.; Van Voorhis, P.
  • The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: an exploratory study
    Salisbury, E.J.; Van Voorhis, P.; Spiropoulos, G.V.
  • Assessing susceptibility to group-based influence
    Scott, T.
  • Female offending and youth justice interventions: a review of literature
    Severinsen, C.; Sanders, J.; Munford, R.; Swift, D.; Kelly, N.; Dewhurst, K.
  • Criminalizing abused girls
    Simkins, S.; Katz, S.
  • Probability, danger, and coercion: a study of risk perception and decision-making in mental health law
    Slovic, P.; Monahan, J.
  • Violence risk assessment and risk communication: the effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats
    Slovic, P.; Monahan, J.; MacGregor, D.
  • Risk assessment of federal female offenders
    Stewart, C.A.
  • Intellectual deficits among incoming federally sentenced men and women offenders: prevalence, profiles, outcomes
    Stewart, L.A.; Wilton, G.; Kelly, L.; Nolan, A.; Talisman, E.
  • Reliability and validity of the dynamic factors identification and analysis – revised
    Stewart, L.A.; Wardrop, K.; Wilton, G.; Thompson, J.; Derkzen, D.; Motiuk, L.
  • Creating choices: report of the task force on federally sentenced women
  • Gender neutral? An empirical test of life-course theories of criminal behaviour
    Thompson, J.
  • Histories of childhood victimization and subsequent mental health problems, substance use, and sexual victimization for a sample of incarcerated women in the US
    Tripodi, S.J.; Pettus-Davis, C.
  • Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment
    Van Voorhis, P.; Wright, E.M.; Salisbury, E.; Bauman, A.
  • Strengths-based assessments for use with forensic populations: a critical review
    Wanamaker, K.A.; Jones, N.J.; Brown, S.L.
  • Can the predictive validity of the dynamic factors identification and analysis – revised be improved by calculated ratings?
    Wilton, G.; Stewart, L.; Motiuk, L.
  • Predicting women’s recidivism: validating a dynamic community-based ‘gender-neutral’ tool
    Yesberg, J.A.; Scanlan, J.M.; Hanby, L.J.; Serin, R.C.; Polaschek, D.L.L.